1969 Ford Mustang 1969 Mach 1 Factory Big Block on 2040-cars
Gaffney, South Carolina, United States
Please email me with any questions or requests for additional pics or something specific at: nicholasnsshanholtzer@lifefriend.com .
1969 Mustang Mach1
Raven Black w/ Factory style AC
This **Rust Free** 1969 Mustang Mach1 turns heads and is a blast to drive. This car is very tight and actually
drives as good as it looks. This car has been maintained to a high standard since its restoration years ago. This
high quality car was restored using only Ford Factory Parts (all chrome and trim is Ford oem). The Raven Black
paint is slick, straight, and shows extremely well. The interior is in excellent shape (seats, carpet, and
headliner almost look new). This car left the factory as a S-code big block 390 Mach 1. The current Motor consists
of the following: 1969 428 Cobra Jet Block dated January 22nd 1969, 1UB Cobra Jet Crankshaft, Cobra jet Rods,
Forged Pistons, a set of worked 427 medium Riser heads with adjustable rockers, PI Ford Aluminum intake port
matched to the 427 heads, Holley Carb, new Headers, Custom Cam, the list goes on… This 428 Cobra Jet runs very
strong and has been balanced (mild mannered until you roll into full throttle…). The C6 automatic transmission
shifts smooth. This Mach1 has disc brakes in the front and drums in the rear. The car handles and brakes
extremely well. The Magnum 500 wheels and BFG tires are like new. The Factory Style Air Condition has been
converted to R134a. This car sold new at Mc Dougald Motors in Claxton, Georgia. The car was scheduled for
production on 11-13-68 but was actually produced on 11-11-68 two days ahead of schedule. If your in the market for
a unique muscle car with class, don't miss this opportunity to own this High Quality 1969 Mach 1 Mustang.
Ford Mustang for Sale
Ford: mustang coupe deluxe(US $7,900.00)
Ford: mustang(US $15,000.00)
Ford: mustang svt cobra(US $9,500.00)
Ford: mustang(US $8,500.00)
Ford: mustang cobra(US $8,500.00)
2007 ford mustang shelby gt500(US $12,500.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
X-Treme Audio Inc ★★★★★
Wingard Towing Service ★★★★★
Threlkeld Inc ★★★★★
TCB Automotive & Towing ★★★★★
Rothrock`s Garage ★★★★★
Reynolds Service Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Mon, 10 Feb 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper.
For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011.
The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors.
Ford dealers offered discounts on tools to fix aluminum
Mon, 27 Jan 2014With the introduction of the aluminum-bodied 2015 Ford F-150 (and the likely use of aluminum in future Ford products), Ford is looking to help its dealerships reduce costs related to repairing this more labor-intensive material. Automotive News is reporting that Ford dealers with body shops will require an estimated $30,000 to $50,000 in equipment and training to work on aluminum, and to help alleviate the financial burden of the new F-150, Ford has announced a special 20-percent discount on this equipment.
Dealers will be able to save up to $10,000 on tools such as welders, air-filtration systems and rivet guns and to create aluminum-specific work stations. The new F-150 goes on sale in the fourth quarter, and dealers have until October 31 to take advantage of this deal, according to the report.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.