1968 Ford Mustang on 2040-cars
Delmont, Pennsylvania, United States
1968 ford mustang fastback frame up restoration that I completed 3 years ago . I went with the Shelby clone theme
and with a dark silver bmw color that makes the car stand out everywhere ( but I always hear is that Eleanor ). I
built this car for my wife but it never leaves the shop unless I take it out so that explains why it only has 2264
miles on it . as you can see from the pictures just about every piece on metal was replaced on this car and while I
was at it I put complete frame rails under the car which everybody knows mustangs did not have . the car has 4
wheel power disc brakes and the rear is a heavy duty 8 inch 325 posi with lowered heavy duty leaf springs and gas
shocks .the front end is a mustang two with power rack and pinion and tubular a arms with 2 inch lowering spindles
and gas shocks with a sway bar . American racing wheels that you never see and 17 inch up front and 18 in the rear.
the engine is a 435 horse 550 ft lb 465 big block ford with a wide ratio 4 speed and a 750 holley LOTS OF POWER AND
TOURQUE. the car runs and handles great . the interior is mostly stock black with the fold down rear seat and the
functioning trap door to the trunk but I did install a custom console and it has blue tooth and usb also.
Ford Mustang for Sale
- 1967 ford mustang s code 390 gt 4 speed(US $16,170.00)
- 1966 ford mustang(US $15,400.00)
- 1970 ford mustang mach 1(US $15,400.00)
- 1969 ford mustang(US $23,800.00)
- 1966 ford mustang convertible(US $15,400.00)
- 1968 ford mustang r code 428 cobra jet 4 speed(US $18,830.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Yardy`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Xtreme Auto Collision ★★★★★
Warwick Auto Park ★★★★★
Walter`s General Repair ★★★★★
Tire Consultants Inc ★★★★★
Tim`s Auto ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford F-450 claims best-in-class towing, company abandons practice of removing items to boost payload number
Tue, 02 Sep 2014The ongoing heavy-duty truck battle between Ford and Ram is showing no signs of slowing down. The Blue Oval is trying to remove at least one point of contention between the two brands by testing its 2015 F-450 Super Duty using the Society of Automotive Engineers J2807 towing standard, which Ram also uses. In the new evaluation, the F-450 is rated at a max towing capacity of 31,200 pounds. That's an identical amount as under Ford's own, previous test.
"We leave no doubt with customers that the F-450 pickup truck has best-in-class towing of 31,200 pounds - whether tested using our own internal towing standards or SAE J2807," said Raj Nair, Ford group vice president for Global Product Development, in the company's release.
At the same time, Ford is also changing how it calculates the F-450's payload. Instead of using its minimum curb weight as before, the brand is now using the truck's base curb weight. The revision lowers the pickup's rating to 5,300 pounds, compared to 5,450 pounds previously. The company said in its announcement that the reason for this is "aligning its payload rating practices with other manufacturers to make it easier for customers to compare vehicles." General Motors made a similar switch for its pickups in August.
1964 Ford GT40 prototype sells for $7M
Mon, 14 Apr 2014Seven-figure Ferraris are not horribly rare. Heck, an eight-figure Ferrari isn't a rare occurrence. Between modern masterpieces like the Enzo and more classic offerings, cracking the million-dollar mark isn't a particularly tall order for the cars from Maranello. For a Ford, though, it's a big deal.
Now, this is not just some rare Mustang. This is a GT40, the car that Henry Ford II commissioned to whip Enzo Ferrari around a track in France. As far as the Le Mans-winning racers go, they don't get much rarer than this one. Sold at the Mecum Auctions in Houston, this is one of the prototypes, meaning it's one of the very first GT40s ever built. That makes its $7 million winning a bid, a record for on-air coverage of the auction, a pretty darn impressive figure.
You can watch the auction below, but first, take a look back at our original story on this rare Blue Oval.
Aluminum lightweighting does, in fact, save fuel
Mon, Apr 14 2014When the best-selling US truck sheds the equivalent weight of three football fullbacks by shifting to aluminum, folks start paying attention. Oak Ridge National Laboratory took a closer look at whether the reduced fuel consumption from a lighter aluminum body makes up for the fact that producing aluminum is far more energy intensive than steel. And the results of the study are pretty encouraging. In a nutshell, the energy needed to produce a vehicle's raw materials accounts for about 10 percent of a typical vehicle's carbon footprint during its total lifecycle, and that number is up from six percent because of advancements in fuel economy (fuel use is down to about 68 percent of total emissions from about 75 percent). Still, even with that higher material-extraction share, the fuel-efficiency gains from aluminum compared to steel will offset the additional vehicle-extraction energy in just 12,000 miles of driving, according to the study. That means that, from an environmental standpoint, aluminum vehicles are playing with the house's money after just one year on the road. Aluminum-sheet construction got topical real quickly earlier this year when Ford said the 2015 F-150 pickup truck would go to a 93-percent aluminum body construction. In addition to aluminum being less corrosive than steel, that change caused the F-150 to shed 700 pounds from its curb weight. And it looks like the Explorer and Expedition SUVs may go on an aluminum diet next. Take a look at SAE International's synopsis of the Oak Ridge Lab's study below. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicle Design Advanced lightweight materials are increasingly being incorporated into new vehicle designs by automakers to enhance performance and assist in complying with increasing requirements of corporate average fuel economy standards. To assess the primary energy and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) implications of vehicle designs utilizing these materials, this study examines the potential life cycle impacts of two lightweight material alternative vehicle designs, i.e., steel and aluminum of a typical passenger vehicle operated today in North America. LCA for three common alternative lightweight vehicle designs are evaluated: current production ("Baseline"), an advanced high strength steel and aluminum design ("LWSV"), and an aluminum-intensive design (AIV).