Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1967 Mustang Factory Gt 390 4 Speed S Code Fastback on 2040-cars

Year:1967 Mileage:999999 Color: DECOR GROUP
Location:

Franklin, Indiana, United States

Franklin, Indiana, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:390
VIN: 7T02S195840 Year: 1967
Drive Type: 4 SPEED
Model: Mustang
Mileage: 999,999
Trim: FASTBACK 390 4 SPEED
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

YOU ARE BIDDING ON A 1967 GT 390 FASTBACK MUSTANG. THIS IS AN ORIGINAL S CODE CAR THAT NOW HAS A NEWLY REBUILT 428 COBRA JET ENGINE. CAR ALSO CURRENLY HAS THE 4 SPEED TOP LOADER TRANSMISSION. THE MARTI REPORT STATES THE CAR WAS ORIGINAL DARK MOSS GREEN WITH IVY GOLD INTERIOR, 4 SPEED AND A 300 REAR AXLE. THE CAR SOLD NEW IN AUGUSTA GEORGIA AT WALKER FORD. THIS CAR WAS ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING FEATURES: GT EQUIPMENT GROUP, FOUR SPEED MANUAL TRANSMISSION, F-70 WIDE OVAL TIRES, WHITE SIDEWALL NYLON TIRES, FIRESTONE BRAND NAME TIRES, CONSOLE, AM/8 TRACK STEREO RADIO,EXTERIOR DECOR GROUP, INTERIOR DECOR GROUP, TINTED GLASS, DELUXE SEAT BELTS,PROTECTION GROUP, STYLED WHEELS,  PRODUCED ON FEB, 6 1967   SIX DAYS BEHIND SCHEDULE. THE CAR WAS PURCHASED BY THE PREVIOUS OWNER FROM SOUTH CAROLINA AND BROUGHT TO OHIO IN 1978, WHERE IT HAS BEEN IN DRY STORAGE EVER SINCE. THIS IS A REALLY SUPER SOLID CAR WITH ONLY SOME MINOR RUST REPAIR DONE YEARS AGO. SEATS HAVE THAT 70S LOOK AND WERE DONE MANY YEARS AGO. EMAIL OR FOR FASTER RESPONCE CALL ME AT 317-332-3716 FOR QUESTIONS, DETAILS, OR ADD A BUY IT NOW PRICE.  THANKS AND GOOD LUCK BIDDING.

Auto Services in Indiana

Yocum Motor Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 107 US Highway 42 W, Bethlehem
Phone: (502) 732-9980

Webb Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 9236 Indianapolis Blvd, Hammond
Phone: (888) 495-9046

Twin City Upholstery Ltd. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: Brimfield
Phone: (309) 533-7959

Tire Discounters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 10513 Dixie Hwy, Elizabeth
Phone: (502) 814-3212

Spurlock Body & Paint Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 68389 County Road 23, New-Paris
Phone: (574) 831-5275

Smith`s Towing ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Towing
Address: Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 384-8533

Auto blog

Ford bringing production F-150 to Detroit with Atlas styling and Alcoa blast shields

Fri, 27 Dec 2013

According to a report in Bloomberg, the 2015 Ford F-150 will indeed be showing up at the Detroit Auto Show next month. It will bring attitude with it, not only in the form of sheetmetal inspired by the Atlas concept (pictured) that appeared at the 2013 Detroit show but also in the Alcoa military blast shields among the display being used to showcase the ruggedness of aluminum.
There's been a lot of talk about the F-150 switching to aluminum body panels (although maintaining a steel frame), and for good reason. The lightweight body is expected to shed more than 700 pounds and greatly increase its highway mileage, but production-line issues and possible delays have been a major focus of attention concerning the best-selling vehicle in America for 32 years, meaning Ford has to get it right. F-150 is responsible for a massive portion of the company's global profits and it will come in a year when company profits are already predicted to decline because of new car launches.
When it comes to dings, the Bloomberg story says Ford wants Alcoa to supply some of the military-grade aluminum it uses for blast shields on battlefield vehicles to help it talk up the toughness of aluminum. Reading commentary on the many stories about the F-150 reveals there are many more little questions about the aluminum overhaul, like "How much will it cost to repair and insure?" and "How will companies hang their magnetic signs?" Answers should start coming in a couple of weeks.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Who sold the most heavy-duty pickups in 2012? PickupTrucks.com investigates

Tue, 26 Feb 2013

Domestic manufacturers enjoyed a good year for heavy-duty pickup sales in 2012. PickupTrucks.com has taken a close look at exactly how those sales broke down between each manufacturer and between three-quarter and one-ton pickups. Ford sold some 67,786 F-250 Super Duty models last year with the Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD falling just behind at 56,359 units. The Ram 2500 HD came in third at 41,918, while the GMC Sierra 2500 HD earned itself fourth place with 27,616 deliveries. While Ford held onto the top spot in the one-ton market, Ram easily nailed down second place by selling more 3500 HD models last year than General Motors sold Silverado 3500 HD and Sierra 3500 HD trucks combined.
So, did GM manage to sell more trucks than Ford with its two brands? Very nearly. Ford sold a total of 119,338 heavy-duty pickups to GM's 111,555. Ram, meanwhile, moved a distant 77,583. But perhaps more interesting is the diesel take rate in this segment. PickupTrucks.com says 80 percent of all domestic one-ton trucks roll from the dealer lot with a turbo-diesel under the hood. Head over to the site for a closer look at the breakdown.