Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1923 Ford T-bucket Hot Rod Rat Rod Roadster on 2040-cars

Year:1923 Mileage:2100 Color: Black /
 Red
Location:

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:5.7 V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Year: 1923
Exterior Color: Black
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Red
Model: Model T
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: T-Bucket
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 2,100
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"There are no issues with the car. Look at the pictures to see."

Up for sale is a very clean 1923 Ford T-Bucket.  The car is titled as a true 1923 and comes with the original plates.  They have been sandblasted but would need paint.  It has a Total Performance body and a professionally built 2x4 tube chasis.  Chevy 350 / 350 combination w/Lokar shifter.  Moon gauges...the ones that were made in the USA. Edelbrock Performer manifold.  Holley carb 600 cfm.  9" Ford rear end.  Painless wiring harness.  Centerline wheels 165 15 front 18.5 wide by 28 tall Mickey Thompson rears.  Has Zoomie baffled headers that are very loud.  Aluminum radiator with dual electric fans.    This car is pushing over 300 HP and you feel and hear every bit of it.  There are numerous other parts on the car...too many to list.  It is built with all the right stuff. . .highway safe!  

Will help in anyway I can with shipping, but the buyer will need to arrange and will bare all costs accordingly.

The car also comes with two 5 point harnesses (not installed) and a box of other goodies.

Please feel free to call with any questions.  

216-509-4135  Adam

Auto Services in Ohio

Zig`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7340 N Ridge Rd, Thompson
Phone: (866) 595-6470

World Auto Network ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 15225 Waterloo Rd, Warrensville-Heights
Phone: (216) 692-1311

Woda Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 18987 State Route 347, Mingo
Phone: (937) 325-8388

Wholesale Tire Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 730 E Market St, Parkman
Phone: (330) 399-6487

Westway Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 2888 Fisher Rd, Galena
Phone: (614) 274-9311

Toth Buick GMC Trucks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3300 S Arlington Rd, Litchfield
Phone: (330) 239-8469

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Ford Fiesta ST in startling track battle against Toyota GT86

Wed, 26 Jun 2013

On the surface, there's very little that the Ford Fiesta ST and Toyota GT86 (or the Scion FR-S that is sold in the US, or the largely similar Subaru BRZ) share in common. One is a hatchback with power coming from a turbocharged engine routed to the front wheels. The other is a coupe with power coming from a naturally aspirated four-cylinder boxer engine routed to the rear wheels.
Thing is, both of them are reasonably priced performance cars aimed at a similar segment of the automotive marketplace, so a comparison isn't out of the question. It is with all of this in mind that we direct you to the video below, in which the blokes from Evo pit the two manic little machines against one another on a race track. The result? Well, it can be summed up this way: Fast versus fun.
See how the track battle goes down in the video below.

We compare 2021 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport specifications to their ritzy Land Rover competiton

Tue, Jul 14 2020

The 2021 Bronco and Bronco Sport are the spearheads for Ford's new 4x4 sub-brand, with the former taking the fight directly to the Jeep Wrangler and the latter providing Ford with a more rugged alternative to the Escape. We've already looked at how the new Bronco and Bronco Sport compare to their mainstream competition, but we'd like to see how the Bronco stacks up to another hotly anticipated returning nameplate: the Land Rover Defender.  Not to leave its little sibling in the cold, I decided to browse Land Rover's lineup and see what might be a suitable counterpoint to the Bronco Sport. For better or worse, I found an almost-perfect fit in the Range Rover Evoque. So, how do these new American 4x4s compare to the Old Country's more-expensive alternatives? Let's dig in, starting with the big boys.  As you might expect from the Bronco's robust credentials, it holds its own here against the more-expensive Brit. The Defender's higher price point brings along a good bit of power advantage with both engines, but that's to be expected. The Defender also has that trick adjustable-height suspension that the Bronco lacks, giving it an edge in practicality, and it can also tow quite a bit more.  On the flip side, there are quite a few advantages to going with the Ford, including a greater number of choices in terms of powertrain. The available manual transmission on four-cylinder Broncos is a nice bonus, for instance, as is the option of getting either the base 2.3-liter or the optional 2.7-liter engine with either wheelbase. The Defender is a bit more restrictive in this regard offering only the inline-six on the short-wheelbase model. As an added bonus, the Bronco is a convertible. That may not necessarily be a "plus" for all shoppers, but it's certainly an added bit of versatility (and potential appeal) the Defender lacks. And of course, the Bronco can be had for as little as $30,000, whereas the Land Rover starts at $50,000. Now, on to the less-rugged siblings. The specs here are actually a little tighter in most respects, but the powertrain story is almost identical. The Evoque checks in where the Bronco Sport tops out, and the Range Rover gets an optional high-output variant of the 2.0-liter turbocharged four.