Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1928 Ford Model A Tudor Sedan Hot Rod Rat Rod on 2040-cars

Year:1928 Mileage:999999
Location:

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Middletown, Ohio, United States
Engine:350
Vehicle Title:Clear
Year: 1928
Make: Ford
Drive Type: rear
Model: Model A
Mileage: 999,999
Trim: tudor
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Selling my hot rod project. 6" chop, 4" channel, custom square tube frame, suicide front end, setup for airride on rear, 9" rear end, 350 goodwrench motor, 2004r overdrive trans, original 60's Cal Custom finned valve covers, not the cheap ass ones on ebay, these are the real deal. Brand new wheels and tires on the back, Speedway drop axle, split wishbones and front disc brakes. Also have original headlights, bags, brackets, and windshield frame. Striped by Mr. Oz in aqua and ivory. new door latches installed with cornwell wrench release levers. This car is built right and has the patina rat rod look that is hot right now. Looks like a rat rod, but everything is new and done right. Have an Ohio title for a 1929 model A tudor sedan.  Auction style bid with a reasonable reserve.  May trade, email me.  Thanks for looking and happy bidding!


On Jun-30-13 at 15:35:20 PDT, seller added the following information:

I didnt realize that a few of the watchers here on ebay dont realize what these cars are worth, or what they're even looking at for that matter.  So let me just clear a few things up;  this is a project car that is not finished.  No, you will not be able to drive it home lol.  I thought the photos of the car were pretty self explanitory, but I guess I needed to elaborate on the car a bit for the newbies.  And no I will not trade a 250cc quad for the car, Thank you.

Auto Services in Ohio

Williams Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 127 S Detroit Ave, Fort-Recovery
Phone: (260) 726-8001

Wagner Subaru ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 217 N Broad St, Bellbrook
Phone: (937) 878-2171

USA Tire & Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: Fort-Loramie
Phone: (937) 310-5354

Toyota-Metro Toyota ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 13775 Brookpark Rd, Wiloughby-Hls
Phone: (440) 933-7915

Top Value Car & Truck Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 1738 E Kemper Rd, Madeira
Phone: (513) 771-2326

Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 751 Columbus Ave, Springboro
Phone: (513) 934-1122

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Exceptionally rare '65 Ford GT40 Roadster prototype up for auction

Sat, 14 Jun 2014

Think of mid-engined supercars and your mind is bound to gravitate towards Europe, but the United States has been known to make a handful from time to time - exceptional vehicles from the likes of Vector, SSC, Mosler, Hennessey, and Saleen. But long before any of those came around, Ford famously became obsessed with beating Ferrari at its own game, leading to the development of the iconic GT40.
The story is well known, sending Ford to the checkered flag at Le Mans four times in a row in the late 1960s. Ford and Shelby also built over 100 for public consumption, but just four of them were roadsters. Of those only one remains in original condition, and now that exceedingly rare example going up for auction.
Consigned to RM Auctions for its mid-August sale during Pebble Beach weekend in Monterey, California, this 1965 model is the first GT40 Roadster built. It was used as a development and demonstration vehicle for Ford and Shelby. Carroll Shelby himself drove Henry Ford II in this very car during one of many test and demo events, this time held for Ford's board of directors in Los Angeles.

The USPS needs 180,000 new delivery vehicles, automakers gearing up to bid

Wed, Feb 18 2015

Winning the New York City Taxi of Tomorrow tender was a huge prize for Nissan, even though the company is still working through the process of claiming its prize. The United States Postal Service has begun the process to take bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace the all-too-familiar Grumman Long Life Vehicle, and that will be a much larger plum for the automaker who wins it, perhaps worth more than six billion dollars. The Grumman LLV is an aluminum body covering a Chevrolet S-10 pickup chassis and General Motors' Iron Duke four-cylinder engine. The USPS bought them from 1987 to 1994, and the 163,000 of them still in service are a monumental drain on postal resources: they get roughly ten miles to the gallon instead of the quoted 16 mpg, drink up more than $530 million in fuel each year, and their constant repair needs like the balky sliding door and leaky windshields have led the service to increase the annual maintenance budget from $100 million to $500 million. A seat belt is about as modern as it gets for safety technology, and the USPS says that assuming things stay the same, it can't afford to run them beyond 2017. Last year it put out two triage requests for proposals seeking 10,000 new chassis and drivetrains for the Grumman and 10,000 new vehicles. The LLV is also too small for the modern mail system in which package delivery is growing and letter delivery is declining. The service says it doesn't have a fixed idea of the ideal "next-generation delivery vehicles," but it listed a number of requirements in its initial request and is open to any proposal. Carriers have some suggestions, though, saying they want better cupholders, sun visors that they can stuff letters behind, a driver's compartment free of slits that can swallow mail, and a backup camera. The request for information sent to automakers pegs the tender at 180,000 vehicles that would cost between $25,000 and $35,000 apiece, and it will hold a conference on February 18 to answer questions about the contract. GM is the only domestic maker to avow an interest, while Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have remained cagey. Yet with a possible $6.3 billion up for grabs and some new vans for sale that would be advertised on every block in the country, we have a feeling everyone will be listening closely come February 18. We also have a feeling the LeMons series is going to be flooded with Grummans come 2017. News Source: Wall Street Journal, Automotive News - sub.