Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Bright Red Interior With Rangoon Red Exterior Convertible 390/330 Hp V8 .ac on 2040-cars

US $22,500.00
Year:1965 Mileage:34 Color: rangoon red /
 bright red
Location:

Berkley, Michigan, United States

Berkley, Michigan, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:THUNDERBIRD SPECIAL 390cid 330 hp V8
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1965
Exterior Color: rangoon red
Make: Ford
Interior Color: bright red
Model: Galaxie
Number of Cylinders: V 8
Trim: bright red interior rangoon red ext convertible
Drive Type: automatic
Mileage: 34
Sub Model: G A L A X I E 5 0 0
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Original,survivor rare Tuscon Arizona barn find , no rust , exellent condition"

1965 G A L A X I E  5 0 0 convertible   all original condition survivor . This G A L A X I E 500 convertible has been in a storage wearhouse in Tuscon Arizona for the past 35 years as part of a retired doctors personal collection. and has less than 35.000 original miles on her. Car came new as a special order from the factory with the THUNDERBIRD SPECIAL performance package which included the 390 cid / 330 hp 4bbl  big block V8, Factory air conditioning , that blows cold with the top down, power steering , power soft top , and very rare ( eye poping ) bright red interior with bright rangoon red exterior color combonation  WOW !  exellent mecanical condition , Never any rust, not even surface rust. the glass , crome and stainless are all in exellent condition as is the interior , exterior and paint. Fits the whole family in comfort and style.This is a very fast and smooth running american icon classic that runs and drives like the day it rolled off the assembly line.  drive anywhere all day everyday. please feel free to ask questions and thank you for looking

Auto Services in Michigan

Waterford Collision Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service
Address: 2579 Dixie Hwy, Pontiac
Phone: (248) 673-4910

Varney`s Automotive Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3038 E Apple Ave, Grand-Haven
Phone: (231) 773-3248

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 2675 S Milford Rd Ste B, Davisburg
Phone: (248) 684-8833

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 210 Ann Arbor Rd W, New-Boston
Phone: (734) 459-5050

Tri County Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 18988 S Mackinac Trl, Kinross
Phone: (906) 478-5331

The Brake Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 970 Fort Street, Dearborn-Hts
Phone: (313) 406-5210

Auto blog

Ford recalls 434k vehicles for several unrelated issues

Mon, 07 Apr 2014

It seems that the hard winter in much of the country has been as rough on some Fords as it has on many people. The Blue Oval is recalling roughly 434,000 vehicles in two separate recalls, and one of them partially caused by the salt used to melt the snow on roads.
The first recall covers 385,750 2001-2004 Escape models in the Midwest, Northeast and Canada because a subframe could rust and eventually fail. This is partially due to the road salt used in those areas, and about 349,000 of the affected vehicles are in the US. To remedy the problem, dealers are installing a reinforcement cross brace on the frame to strengthen them. There has been one crash caused by the failure but no injuries. According to The Detroit News, this is not the first rust-related recall for Ford. It estimates the company has repaired over two million vehicles since 2010 for problems on vehicles related to the iron oxide, including the rear wheel wells of the Freestar minivan.
The second recall covers 48,950 2013-2014 Ford Fusion, Escape, C-MAX and Lincoln MKZ models because welds in their seatbacks don't meet National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards. The fault affects the front seats, and the sub-standard welds joining the setback to the recliner could increase the chance on injury. There have been no reported injuries or accidents caused by the problem, but there are 42,972 affected vehicles in the US and 4,744 in Canada.

Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #324 LIVE!

Tue, 12 Mar 2013

We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #324 tonight, and our friend Peter Leung (a.k.a. BaronVonClutch), who writes about racing for Richland F1 is going to teach us how to love the vroom-vroom. Drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #324
Geneva Motor Show highlights from Zach

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.