1965 Ford Galaxie 500 2-door Hardtop **rust Free Project Car Runs & Drives** on 2040-cars
Seymour, Tennessee, United States
SOUTHGATE AUTO PRESENTS **PERFECT PROJECT CAR** 1965 FORD GALAXIE 500 2 DOOR HARDTOP **RUST FREE** *352 V-8 AUTOMATIC *COMPLETE BODY w/ ALL GOOD GLASS & CHROME *INTERIOR IS FAIR *DUAL EXHAUST **RUNS & DRIVES** **ALL INTERIOR CHROME & TRIM IS IN TRUNK** NO RUST UNDERNETH AND ALL GOOD ROCKER PANELS TOO!THIS WOULD MAKE A GREAT FATHER/SON PROJECT BUY IT NOW @ $5,000 BEFORE WE RESTORE IT AND ASK $15,000 WAS OWNED BY LOCAL OLDER COUPLE FOR THE PAST 25 YEARS!!! THIS IS NOT A RAGGED OUT 500 THIS IS CAR JUST NEEDS A NEW OWNER TO BLOW NEW LIFE INTO HER! WE HAVE SO MANY PROJECTS AND CURRENTLY OVER BOOKED SO WE'RE PASSING THE SAVINGS TO YOU! HOWEVER IF YOU BUY WANT US TO BUILD HER WE CAN DO SO AS WE HAVE BUILT QUALITY DRIVERS FOR OUR CUSTOMERS WHO ARE ALL OVER THE WORLD. OUR LATEST BUILD IS HEADED TO FRANCE AS WE SPEAK!! AND QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS CALL 865.805.3186 GLEN OR 865.640.3143 LEE FEEL FREE TO COME INSPECT CAR BEFORE YOU BUY CAUSE ONCE WE ACCEPT YOUR OFFER YOU ARE THE OWNER! THANKS AND GOOD LUCK! |
Ford Galaxie for Sale
1963 ford galaxie 500. old school hot rod . big block . 4 speed .. awesome car .
1963 1/2 ford galaxie 500(US $21,500.00)
Ford,1960,galaxie, starliner,2 drht,barn find, unmolested original,1961,1962,
1963 ford galaxie 500 xl convertible, z code thunderbird 390, fresh mechanicals.
1964 ford galaxie post and 1964 xl 500 body for parts(US $1,000.00)
1 owner just 19000 miles 1972 ford ltd coupe in amazing original condition,sweet
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
White & Peels Auto Center ★★★★★
West Broad Auto Sales ★★★★★
Topside Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Stout`s Riverside Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Former Ford CEO Alan Mulally lands on Google board
Wed, 16 Jul 2014Former Ford CEO Alan Mulally often referred to the Blue Oval as a technology company when he led the automaker. Now he'll be offering guidance to a different kind of technology firm: Google.
Mulally was appointed to Google's board of directors July 9, and late Tuesday, it was announced that he will serve on the company's audit committee. The veteran executive led Ford from September 2006 until he retired in June, succeeded by Mark Fields.
While Mulally will act as a board member - rather than in a managerial role - his presence adds credibility to Google's recently announced plans to produce an autonomous car. The ambitious program calls for 100 prototypes to begin testing later this summer. Production of the car is rumored to be in collaboration with a Detroit area performance company, Roush.
2016 Ford Focus RS leaked ahead of official debut
Tue, Feb 3 2015We won't officially see the new Ford Focus RS until the Blue Oval shows it to the world at an event on Tuesday, but here it is ahead of time, courtesy of the folks at Evo. As you can see, this is one hot little hatch, and if Evo's story is to be believed, those aggressive looks will be backed up with some pretty serious performance. Power is said to come from Ford's 2.3-liter EcoBoost inline four-cylinder engine, though the magazine's estimate of 250 horsepower seems awfully conservative to us (considering that's less than the current Focus ST). If earlier reports are to be believed, we think the RS will come packing more like 300 hp, if not more. For the first time, the Focus RS will use all-wheel drive with brake-operated torque-vectoring, and Evo says that up to 70 percent of the engine's power can be sent to the rear wheels. Hitting 60 miles per hour will reportedly take less than five seconds. Otherwise, it's business as usual, with a mean-looking exterior complete with the necessary aero bits (notice that wing!), and inside, we can see a beefy set of Recaro chairs. That's really all we know for now, but stay tuned for more when the Focus RS makes its official debut in the not-too-distant future. Related Video:
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.