Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Ford Galaxie "p" Code Car on 2040-cars

US $14,500.00
Year:1964 Mileage:1000
Location:

Lucama, North Carolina, United States

Lucama, North Carolina, United States
Advertising:

 YOU WILL BE BIDDING ON A 1964 FORD GALAXIE ( NOT XL). THIS IS A "P" CODE CAR. 

390 HP WITH 3 DUCES, (3 2 BARRELS CARBUERATORS)  WITH A FOUR SPEED TRANSMISSION. THIS IS ALL FACTORY WITH "P" CODE CAR

THIS WAS ONE OF MY HUSBAND COLLECTIONS BEFORE HE DIED. I HAVE NO USE FOR IT SO I AM GOING TO SELL IT. THIS IS A NICE CAR. IT IS CLEAN AND HAS A ORIGNAL RUNNING GEAR IN IT. THE ENGINE HAS BEEN REBUILT AND HAS ABOUT 150 MILES ON IT. THIS IS JUST ONE OF HIS COLLECTIONS.  

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS GIVE ME A CALL 252-239-8516 OR 252-294-4762 OR EMAIL ME AT dfj5086@yahoo.com

Auto Services in North Carolina

Xpertech Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1295 Tunnel Rd, Fletcher
Phone: (828) 298-3612

Wilmington Motor Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 300 Old Dairy Rd, Rocky-Point
Phone: (910) 399-1795

Wedgewood Muffler Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 407 1/2 W Gannon Ave, Zebulon
Phone: (919) 269-6166

Vander Tire And Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3607 Clinton Rd, Linden
Phone: (910) 483-2585

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 7856 Idlewild Rd, Waxhaw
Phone: (704) 882-3371

Transmedics Transmission Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Consultants
Address: 5211 Lacy Ave, Garner
Phone: (919) 954-8699

Auto blog

Americans will get a four-cylinder Ford Mustang after all? [w/poll]

Sat, 09 Mar 2013

Ask and you shall receive. Remember that previous report suggesting that the 2015 Ford Mustang getting a four-cylinder EcoBoost engine, and that it would be sold in Europe only and not the United States? Well, according to Road & Track, the rumor is only partially true - The Mustang will get the engine, but it is indeed coming to America.
Additionally, according to RT, the 3.7-liter V6 will continue to serve as the base engine, and since it offers up a stout 305 horsepower in its current form, it's likely that the 2.3-liter four-cylinder EcoBoost will produce a bit more than that. At the top of the range, the Mustang GT will continue to soldier on with a V8 engine, which should continue to send over 400 horsepower to the rear wheels.
Finally, while we agree 100 percent with RT's heartfelt request for a paddle-shift automatic, we certainly expect that the EcoBoost 'Stang will be offered with a manual transmission as standard equipment. This is a Mustang, after all...

Ford cleans up painting process with cameras

Thu, 22 Aug 2013

Knowing how the bacon gets made rarely entices us and, in the same vein, the same usually goes for knowing about how new cars get painted. But in both instances, however, quality - or a lack thereof - is instantly obvious. In terms of the latter, Ford is showing off its new paint quality process with 3D Dirt Detection Technology to find imperfections in vehicle paint more easily and more quickly.
This process - being performed on the F-150 SVT Raptor above - uses 16 computer-controlled cameras to create a three-dimensional model (inset) of the vehicle to detect flaws in the paint including dirt particles, which can then be buffed out manually. Ford says this new technology cuts down on time spent looking for paint flaws and gives workers more time to correct those that are discovered.
Currently, Ford only uses its 3D Dirt Detection Technology system at three factories (the Dearborn, MI facility, along with those in Louisville, Kentucky and Valencia, Spain), but it will soon spread to five more plants in North America. Ford has released a video and press release for this innovative and unexpectedly interesting process, both of which are posted below.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.