2014 Ford Fusion Titanium on 2040-cars
2651 West Main, Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Engine:2.0L I4 16V GDI DOHC Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FA6P0D92ER297557
Stock Num: 14324
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion Titanium
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: White Platinum Tri-Coat Metallic
Interior Color: Charcoal Black
Options: Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 1
Instant savings include Inskeep Ford discounts and a $2500.00 Factory Rebate with Ford Credit financing at standard rates. As an alternative, customers may choose 0% APR for up to 60 months plus a $1000. rebate thru Ford Credit. Destination charges are included in the sale price. State sales tax, dealer documentation fee and tire tax not included. Check with us for details and for any possible additional incentives. Inskeep Ford earning your Trust and Loyalty everyday - Eastside Indy's Best Choice for Price - Service - Satisfaction. Check out what are customers have to say about us on google or dealerrater.com/dealer/Inskeep-Ford-review-20780/ **New car pricing does not include, sales tax or title fees.** Inskeep Ford is a three time Presidents Award Winning Dealership. We also have an Award winning service department with Ford Certified Technicians. Need more information? Please call 888-281-8041 or visit our website at www.inskeepford.com
Ford Fusion for Sale
- 2012 ford fusion sel(US $18,985.00)
- 2014 ford fusion s(US $22,695.00)
- 2013 ford fusion se(US $22,790.00)
- 2013 ford fusion se(US $22,000.00)
- 2014 ford fusion s(US $22,695.00)
- 2013 ford fusion se(US $22,900.00)
Auto Services in Indiana
Wilson`s Transmission ★★★★★
Westside Motors ★★★★★
Tom Roush Mazda ★★★★★
Tom & Ed`s Autobody Inc ★★★★★
Seniour`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★
Ryan`s Radiator & Auto Air Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford posts record pre-tax Q3 profit of $2.6B
Thu, 24 Oct 2013Ford took in $2.6 billion in pre-tax profits in the third quarter of the year, making for a record trio of months that saw the Blue Oval's year-over-year earnings increase by $426 million. The earnings are being attributed not just to improvements in North American sales, but sales around the globe.
Revenue was up 12 percent, to $36 billion, although net income took a hit, dropping $359 million to $1.3 billion. Ford was dinged with $498 million in pre-tax charges, which are being blamed for the drop in net income.
The news has boosted Ford's hopes for full-year results, bumping it's total profits up past $8 billion, according to Automotive News. The Dearborn, MI-based manufacturer is still expecting a loss in Europe, although it's forecasted less than the $1.73 billion it burned in 2012. In fact, according to CFO Bob Shanks, Ford's European losses dropped by 51 percent year-over year, a huge improvement for the brand.
Weekly Recap: Auto execs face life in prison for recall delays under proposed legislation
Sat, 09 Aug 2014
The stiff punishments are part of broader transportation legislation, but clearly McCaskill has automakers in her sights.
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill threw down the gauntlet this week, proposing a bill that could send auto executives to prison for life if they were found to have delayed a recall. She also wants to eliminate the limit for fines for auto safety violations, which are currently capped at $35 million.
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.