Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford Fusion Se on 2040-cars

US $26,810.00
Year:2014 Mileage:5 Color: Dark Side Metallic /
 Dune
Location:

9387 Ocean Highway, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, United States

9387 Ocean Highway, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:1.5L I4 16V GDI DOHC Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FA6P0HD1ER363224
Stock Num: 14-0576
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion SE
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Dark Side Metallic
Interior Color: Dune
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Digital Audio Input
  • digital keypad power door locks
  • Driver and passenger knee airbags
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 16.5 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 22 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 34 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.5 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 16 cu.ft.
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • Metal-look door trim
  • Metal-look shift knob trim
  • Metal-look/piano black center console trim
  • MP3 player
  • Painted aluminum rims
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Regular fro
  • Remote
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote window operation
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM AM/FM/Satellite Radio
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio(TM)
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • SYNC with MyFord
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 6
  • Trip computer
  • Turn signal in mirrors
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 5

Tidelands Ford Lincoln has been serving your community for over 18 years.

Auto Services in South Carolina

Wilson Chrysler Dodge Jeep Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 301 S Congress St, Lebanon
Phone: (800) 551-1767

Usa Tire & Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 100 Fort Mill Sq, York
Phone: (803) 548-2055

Tire Town South ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 3414 Macklen Rd, Bucksport
Phone: (843) 293-4949

Tire Kingdom ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Wheels
Address: 5352 South Blvd, Tega-Cay
Phone: (704) 521-9002

Steve White Volkswagen Audi ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 100 Duvall Dr, Reidville
Phone: (864) 288-8300

St. Andrews Express Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 4653 Broad River Rd, Cayce
Phone: (803) 772-5916

Auto blog

Ford Green Zone works magic with GPS to make your drive smarter, cleaner

Fri, Aug 29 2014

For the most part, plug-in hybrids rely on the power stored in the battery until that charge is depleted. Unless the switch can be changed manually, it's only then that the cars fire up the internal combustion engine and begin using the fossil fuels on board. This is ideal, of course, when one's drive isn't long enough that the car needs to start sipping gasoline at all. On longer commutes, when it's certain that the route is longer than the car's all-electric range, this isn't necessarily the most efficient use of energy. Ford's Green Zone system is designed to save some of that juice for the parts of the drive that require slower speeds. Ford is working on a smart system, based on Nokia mapping technology, that uses GPS data to use both the electricity and conventional fuel more efficiently. Since battery power is less efficient at highway speeds, Ford's Green Zone system is designed to save some of that juice for the parts of the drive that require slower speeds, rather than just using up all the electrons right at the beginning of the drive. Using a website or the in-car navigation system, the driver can pinpoint the parts of the route, highlighted in green, where using battery power would be more effective, and set the car to automatically switch to electricity for those sections. Depending on the route, the car could automatically switch back and forth between the two power sources multiple times, particularly if the drive is a mix between city and highway driving. Of course, Green Zone will be go beyond that. The program is being developed to take traffic and road grade into account, details that allow the car to be make even smarter choices to improve efficiency. Ford even hopes to have Green Zone learn driver habits, and respond accordingly depending on who is driving the car. The system could control other features as well, such as anticipating corners and shifting the headlights to better illuminate the road ahead. Green Zone could also potentially use information from vehicle-to-vehicle networking to control functions in the car. The Green Zone system still has a few years before it will be ready to be put into production vehicles, but Ford is confident it will make its way onto the road eventually. As with other innovations that improve efficiency and make our vehicles smarter, we can expect to see similar technology from other manufacturers, until it becomes a regular part of driving in the future.

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.