Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2012 Ford Fusion Se on 2040-cars

US $17,937.00
Year:2012 Mileage:31392 Color: Blue
Location:

4676 Route 152 South, Lavalette, West Virginia, United States

4676 Route 152 South, Lavalette, West Virginia, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:Gas I4 2.5L/152
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FAHP0HA7CR197920
Stock Num: T07113A
Make: Ford
Model: Fusion SE
Year: 2012
Exterior Color: Blue
Options:
  • 4-Wheel Disc Brakes
  • A/C
  • ABS
  • Adjustable Steering Wheel
  • Aluminum Wheels
  • AM/FM Stereo
  • Automatic Headlights
  • Auxiliary Audio Input
  • Bucket Seats
  • CD Player
  • Child Safety Locks
  • Climate Control
  • Cloth Seats
  • Cruise Control
  • Driver Adjustable Lumbar
  • Driver Air Bag
  • Driver Illuminated Vanity Mirror
  • Driver Vanity Mirror
  • Emergency Trunk Release
  • Engine Immobilizer
  • Floor Mats
  • Fog Lamps
  • Front Head Air Bag
  • Front Reading Lamps
  • Front Side Air Bag
  • Front Wheel Drive
  • Intermittent Wipers
  • Keyless Entry
  • MP3 Player
  • Pass-Through Rear Seat
  • Passenger Air Bag
  • Passenger Air Bag Sensor
  • Passenger Illuminated Visor Mirror
  • Passenger Vanity Mirror
  • Power Door Locks
  • Power Driver Seat
  • Power Mirror(s)
  • Power Outlet
  • Power Steering
  • Power Windows
  • Rear Bench Seat
  • Rear Defrost
  • Rear Head Air Bag
  • Rear Reading Lamps
  • Rear Side Air Bag
  • Remote Trunk Release
  • Satellite Radio
  • Security System
  • Stability Control
  • Steering Wheel Audio Controls
  • Temporary Spare Tire
  • Tire Pressure Monitor
  • Tires - Front Performance
  • Tires - Rear Performance
  • Traction Control
  • Trip Computer
  • Variable Speed Intermittent Wipers
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 31392

Outstanding customer service and unbeatable deals only at River City Ford. We Say Yes! www.rivercityford.com 888-298-0399 At River City Ford our commitment to customer service is second to none. As one of the premier dealership's in the country our inventory moves quickly PLEASE contact us quickly to check availability for your new vehicle. Easy, no-worry financing available for all credit situations. We go out of our way to earn your business with our low prices & friendly customer service. 888-298-0399

Auto Services in West Virginia

Thumpin Car Stereo Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Consumer Electronics
Address: 17715 Virginia Ave Ste 1, Hedgesville
Phone: (301) 739-8814

Saffford Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1659 Berryville Pike, Ridgeway
Phone: (540) 667-5532

Roy`s Quality Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 8 E Oak Ridge Dr, Falling-Waters
Phone: (301) 733-1771

Griff`s Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 409 E 8th St, Mineral-Wells
Phone: (304) 485-9050

Fisher Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 424 Fairmont Ave, Shinnston
Phone: (304) 363-9100

City Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 340 Dual Hwy, Falling-Waters
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.

Autoblog editors choose their favorite racecars of all time

Thu, Feb 26 2015

If you like cars, there is a good chance that you like racecars. There's something about the science and the art of going faster, of competition, of achievement, that accelerates the hearts of enthusiasts. It doesn't matter the series, the team or the manufacturer – there's something about racing that stirs emotions and lifts spirits. It's that way with many of you, and it's that way with our editors. With that in mind, we offer a list of our favorite racecars of all time. Of course, we'd like to hear some of yours in the comment section below. 1970 Porsche 917 Compared to some of the obscure choices by my colleagues, I feel like the Porsche 917 is almost so obvious a pick as to not be worth mentioning. Still, when coming up with my answer, my mind invariably went back to this classic racer – specifically in its blue-and-orange Gulf livery – while watching Le Mans on DVD and later Blu Ray with my dad. Long, low and curvaceous, few vehicles have ever looked sexier lapping a track than the 917. More than just a pretty face, this beauty had speed, too, thanks to several tunes of flat-12 engines over the course of its racing life. In the early '70s, Porsche was a dominant force throughout sports-car competition, and the 917 (shown above at the 1970 24 Hours of Daytona) was the tip of that spear, including back-to-back victories in the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Largely without dialogue or really much of a traditional plot, Le Mans is like a tone poem of racing goodness. While the 917's importance to motorsports history is undoubtedly fascinating, it's still this cinematic depiction of the Porsche racer that draws me in most, especially with the volume cranked. – Chris Bruce Associate Editor 1964 Mini Cooper S How could everyone not be selecting the 1964 Mini Cooper S piloted by Paddy Hopkirk and Henry Liddon? That car, 33 EJB, took the first of British Motor Corporation's four Monte Carlo Rally wins (it should have been five, but French judges got the British Minis [and Fords] disqualified on a technicality regarding headlights... which its own car, the winning DS, was also in violation of). The tiny red car and its white roof beat out Ford Falcons, Mercedes-Benz 300SEs and scores of Volvos, Volkswagens and Saabs. This, along with the several years of dominance that followed, cemented the idea that not only could the tiny, two-tone Mini be a real performance vehicle, but that family-friendly city cars in general could be fun.

Aluminum lightweighting does, in fact, save fuel

Mon, Apr 14 2014

When the best-selling US truck sheds the equivalent weight of three football fullbacks by shifting to aluminum, folks start paying attention. Oak Ridge National Laboratory took a closer look at whether the reduced fuel consumption from a lighter aluminum body makes up for the fact that producing aluminum is far more energy intensive than steel. And the results of the study are pretty encouraging. In a nutshell, the energy needed to produce a vehicle's raw materials accounts for about 10 percent of a typical vehicle's carbon footprint during its total lifecycle, and that number is up from six percent because of advancements in fuel economy (fuel use is down to about 68 percent of total emissions from about 75 percent). Still, even with that higher material-extraction share, the fuel-efficiency gains from aluminum compared to steel will offset the additional vehicle-extraction energy in just 12,000 miles of driving, according to the study. That means that, from an environmental standpoint, aluminum vehicles are playing with the house's money after just one year on the road. Aluminum-sheet construction got topical real quickly earlier this year when Ford said the 2015 F-150 pickup truck would go to a 93-percent aluminum body construction. In addition to aluminum being less corrosive than steel, that change caused the F-150 to shed 700 pounds from its curb weight. And it looks like the Explorer and Expedition SUVs may go on an aluminum diet next. Take a look at SAE International's synopsis of the Oak Ridge Lab's study below. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicle Design Advanced lightweight materials are increasingly being incorporated into new vehicle designs by automakers to enhance performance and assist in complying with increasing requirements of corporate average fuel economy standards. To assess the primary energy and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) implications of vehicle designs utilizing these materials, this study examines the potential life cycle impacts of two lightweight material alternative vehicle designs, i.e., steel and aluminum of a typical passenger vehicle operated today in North America. LCA for three common alternative lightweight vehicle designs are evaluated: current production ("Baseline"), an advanced high strength steel and aluminum design ("LWSV"), and an aluminum-intensive design (AIV).