Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Great Minivan < 90k Miles 2005 Ford Freestar Sel on 2040-cars

US $5,500.00
Year:2005 Mileage:89705 Color: /tan
Location:

Salem, Ohio, United States

Salem, Ohio, United States
Advertising:

For sale is a 2005 sage-exterior/tan-interior Ford Freestar SLE Passenger Van. The van has just under 90,000 miles on it. No rust other than a slight blemish on the body just forward of the driver side rear tire well. We are the 2nd owners of this vehicle with original carfax.  We purchased this van as a low-cost option while our 2002 Pontiac Montana minivan was off the road for a few months due to the need for replacement of its intake manifold gasket.  There have been no accidents, issues or damage to the this Freestar since we purchased it. We are selling the Freestar now because we wanted a van that will last us 10+ years.  Being in a better financial position now compared with 2 years ago, we recently went out and bought a new van so we no longer need this one.  It will serve your family well like it did ours for the last 2+ years.


 This van is in GREAT shape, much like you would expect to find it when buying it from a reputable used-car dealership.

- 7 Passenger seating with fold-into-floor rear bench seat
- Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows and Power Locks
- 4 new 65K mile tires
- 4 wheel alignment done with the purchase of the 4 new tires
- New calipers, rotors and brake pads on the rear tires
- New rotors and brake pads on the front tires
- Oil newly changed
- Fully cleaned (detailed inside and out)
- Runs GREAT

This really is a great van at a very good price that we wouldn't be selling if not for the new van we just purchased.  It is available for a test drive by scheduled appointment.

Payment must be made by cash or certified check.  Two forms of ID with one form being a picture ID must be presented to ensure buyer identify.

Auto Services in Ohio

Wired Right ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems, Automobile Accessories
Address: 22350 Lorain Rd, Strongsville
Phone: (440) 734-3838

Wheel Medic Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2971 Silver Dr, Groveport
Phone: (614) 299-9866

Wheatley Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2195 N Cleve-Mass Rd, Bath
Phone: (330) 659-2022

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: Mount-Healthy
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Walton Hills Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Convenience Stores
Address: 17975 Alexander Rd, Shaker-Heights
Phone: (440) 232-9728

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 649 Leona St, Amherst
Phone: (440) 324-7484

Auto blog

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.

2015 Ford F-150 to get up to 26 miles per gallon

Fri, Nov 21 2014

The 2015 Ford F-150 is one of the most important US vehicle debuts in years, be it in the pickup segment or the entire marketplace. While we've already known about the truck's engine lineup, its payload ratings and we've even learned a bit about how it drives, the truck's EPA-estimated fuel economy ratings have remained a mystery. The wait is finally over. Ford has announced numbers that put the latest F-150 as the mileage leader among gasoline-powered, full-size pickups in the US, with its new 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 topping the charts. Starting with the entry-level naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V6, the rear-wheel-drive F-150 is rated at 18-miles-per-gallon city, 25-mpg highway and 20-mpg combined. Opting for four-wheel drive drops those numbers slightly to 17/23/19. If fuel economy is your absolute priority, then upgrading to the 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 is the hot ticket. It improves things further to 19/26/22 in rear-wheel drive trim or 18/23/20 with four-wheel drive. The carryover naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V8 is rated at 15/22/18 as a 4X2 or 15/21/17 as a 4X4. Finally, the flagship 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 tops the range in available torque and offers buyers 17/24/20 ratings with rear-wheel drive or 17/23/19 with four-wheel drive. "We are delivering with the toughest, smartest and most capable F-150 ever – and now the highest EPA-estimated fuel economy ratings of any full-size gas-powered pickup in America," said Raj Nair, Ford group vice president, Global Product Development, in the company's announcement. Depending on engine and drivetrain configuration, Ford contends that the 2.7-liter EcoBoost's top rating puts fuel economy up between 5 and 29 percent over the current generation, thanks in large part to the truck's lighter aluminum construction. Obviously, these are EPA estimates, and your mileage may vary – ours has. Recently, Autoblog team members have had real difficulty even approximating government mpg estimates on many EcoBoost models, including the new F-150. Scroll down to read Ford's full announcement, including comparisons to rival models.

Ford Fusion production scaled back just 3 months after it was accelerated

Mon, 02 Dec 2013

Three months after kicking off production of the Ford Fusion at its Flat Rock, MI factory, Ford Motor Company is taking steps to trim output in the face of heavily discounted competition from Toyota and a growing supply of vehicles.
The addition of Fusion production in Flat Rock - which also builds the Mustang - was meant to be what pushed the handsome mid-sizer past its arch-nemesis, the Toyota Camry. An extra facility building Fusions was also meant to curb the growing demand for Ford's highly profitable sedan.
But with word that Flat Rock would take "approximately" one extra week off for the holidays combined with an 88-day supply of Fusions - reportedly due in no small part to what Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas called "aggressive discounting of the Camry" - some analysts are now beginning to wonder if Ford may have overextended itself by adding a second Fusion facility to the mix.