2012 Ford Focus Se Sedan 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars
Texarkana, Arkansas, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Sedan
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
Mileage: 80,201
Make: Ford
Sub Model: SE
Model: Focus
Exterior Color: White
Trim: SE Sedan 4-Door
Interior Color: Tan
Drive Type: FWD
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 4
Disability Equipped: No
2012 FORD FOCUS SE 4-DOOR SEDAN
THIS IS AN OFF LEASE COMPANY CAR
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT OPPERTUNITY TO OWN A 2012 AT A FRACTION OF THE ORIGINAL MSRP!!!!!
FOR MORE INFORMATION OR PHOTOS
CONTACT DAVID @ (903) 278-7465
Ford Focus for Sale
- 2000 ford focus zts sedan 4-door 2.0l
- 12 focus titanium hatchback, 2.0l 4 cylinder, auto, navi, sunroof, clean 1 owner
- 2003 ford focus ztw wagon 4-door 2.3l(US $4,250.00)
- 2002 ford focus se sedan new engine in 2009, great serviced car no reserve
- Repairable - 2012 ford focus sel sedan 4-door 2.0l clean title 19k miles(US $7,800.00)
- We finance 2001 ford focus se auto 1 owner 85k clean carfax kylssent cd spoiler(US $4,000.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Warren Service & Repair ★★★★★
Tim Parker Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★
S & P Motors ★★★★★
Premier Collision ★★★★★
Paragould Autobody ★★★★★
N Motion Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
40+ cars that barely avoid the gas guzzler tax
Thu, 24 Jul 2014
The Gas Guzzler schedule, with mpg ratings and charges that haven't changed since 1991, lays out which fuel-swillers owe what to Uncle Sam.
I started thinking about the "Gas Guzzler Tax" - considerably less well known as The Energy Tax Act of 1978 - when I was driving Dodge's new Challenger SRT Hellcat last week. Unsurprisingly for a car that can burn 1.5 gallons of gas per minute at max tilt, theoretically able to empty a full tank of premium in about 13 minutes, the Hellcat will be subject to the Gas Guzzler Tax schedule when it goes on sale.
Ford to revisit CVTs?
Thu, Dec 11 2014Today, Ford wishes its first experience with non-hybrid continuously variable transmissions was far behind it. The Blue Oval was awash in complaints and a couple of class-action lawsuits over the CVTs used in its 2005-2007 Ford Freestyle, Five Hundred and Mercury Montego models, which were a manufactured in Batavia, Ohio as part of a joint venture with ZF. The company gave up on the CVT after just two years, but with fuel economy standards pressing automakers to conjure new tricks, Ford's global product development head, Raj Nair, is now saying the transmissions might make a return, "particularly in the low torque applications," says Automotive News. An obvious candidate for CVT consideration is the 1.0-liter Fiesta that can presently only be had with a five-speed manual. Beyond that, the company's 1.6-liter and 2.0-liter four-cylinder engines might fit the bill. Ford hasn't given any indication as to what vehicles it might use to reintroduce the CVT to the US market, or hints about timeline or who would develop it, however. Some CVT trivia: The 1990 Subaru Justy II was the first US passenger car offered with a continuously variable transmission - Subaru called it the ECVT. It handled gearing duties for a 1.2-liter, inline three-cylinder engine that got all of 70 horsepower. A contemporary blurb about the car begins with "Goodness, gracious, great gobs of gimmickry," and goes on to say that "We can't imagine where you would take this car for repairs, but we are certain that the one mechanic in the world who can fix it lives in a very expensive house." The transmission didn't win any fans, but the ECVT and the car have been largely forgotten, while Subaru played the long game and now you'll find its vastly improved Lineartronic CVT on six of the eight models it sells.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.