Falcon Futura Sprint Convertible, “dandy Don” Merideth (dallas Cowboys) Owned on 2040-cars
Bowling Green, Ohio, United States
Body Type:Convertible
Engine:260 CI V8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Falcon
Trim: Futura
Drive Type: RWD
Options: Leather Seats, Convertible
Mileage: 62,750
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: Sprint
Exterior Color: Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Tan
Ford Falcon for Sale
- 1968 ford falcon
- 1965 ford falcon real-deal sprint, born black, pristine car, not mustang(US $20,250.00)
- 1965 falcon " barn find nostalgia" super stock drag racer(US $14,000.00)
- Yellow 1963 ford falcon futura convertible a beauty 63 62 61 auto buckets(US $11,000.00)
- 1960 ford falcon four door great looking falcon
- 1963 ford falcon futura 2.8l
Auto Services in Ohio
Williams Norwalk Tire & Alignment ★★★★★
White-Allen European Auto Grp ★★★★★
Welch`s Golf Cart Inc ★★★★★
Vehicles Unlimited Inc ★★★★★
Tom`s Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★
Smith`s Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Shelby GT500 laps N"urburgring in under 7:40?
Wed, 30 Oct 2013A couple of weeks ago we brought you footage and official times of the new Chevy Camaro Z/28 lapping the Nürburgring. With a 7:37.47 lap time, the Z/28 emerged as the fastest muscle car ever to lap the circuit. But what was missing from that picture was how fast the king of all Mustangs, the Shelby GT500, could manage to lap the Nordschleife.
Ford never released any information or footage of the GT500 on the Nürburgring that we were aware of - that is, until the guys at SVTPerformance.com put in a request for Mustang videos. Among the clips they received was never-seen, in-car footage of the Shelby GT500 lapping the circuit. And boy did it hustle.
Although not quite official, the video seems to show the GT500 lapped the venerated German track in a touch under 7:40. That would make it a tick or two faster than the Camaro ZL1 - but what of the Z/28? By Chevy's quoted time, the Z/28 is still faster than the GT500, but SVTPerformance suggests GM may have fudged the numbers a bit and scrubbed half a second or so off their lap time.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
'Car Wars' says Ford, Honda to pick up share, Fiat-Chrysler ambitions downplayed
Sat, 14 Jun 2014Don't look for a tremendous shifts in automotive market share over the next three years because it might not be coming. That's at least according to the annual Car Wars report by John Murphy, from Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Research.
In the report's analysis of automakers' market share from 2013 to 2017, it predicts only small changes among the major companies. Ford and Honda see the biggest positive effect with an estimated 0.5 percent increase in their shares over the next three years; to 16.2 percent and 10.3 percent respectively. On the flip side, European automakers and Nissan are expected to lose 0.2 percent each to fall to 8.3 percent and 7.8 percent each respectively. The rest of the industry is predicted to hold steady as it is now.
The biggest loser in that prediction might be Fiat-Chrysler Automobiles. The report certainly throws a wet blanket on its plan for significant gains in market share. Murphy told The Detroit News that the company's goal was "almost unattainable."