1965 Ford Falcon Ranchero, V8 289, Rare Bucket Seat Classic on 2040-cars
Clio, Michigan, United States
1965 Ford Ranchero
V8 289ci from 1965 Fairlane, originally V6 (NADA Classic Values: http://www.nadaguides.com/Classic-Cars/1965/Ford/Falcon-Ranchero/Pickup/Values) Selling my beautiful Ranchero due to disability. Car has been in storage for 2 years but has been started and gear shifted monthly. The Ranchero is a true 5 footer and has been placed in local car shows. I have listed the few defects. Enjoy the auction! 4 Barrel Edelbrock Carb, Manual Choke
Original: All in great condition
Updates:
Imperfections:
>Everything works to include Horn, Vent Blower, Windows roll, Triangle windows turn, Dash lights, Head lights/ tail lights, Door latches, Manual choke, and Tail gate. >This item is being sold "AS-IS" but guaranteed to be as pictured and described. Every effort to describe each item as best as possible and I ask that you please read the listing in its entirety. If you have any other questions or concerns please send us a message through eBay.
>Seller accepts:
>If immediate payment is not made you must contact seller within three days from end of auction with payment information. Payments must be received within 7 days unless other arrangements have been made. If payments have not been made within the 7 day period your item may be resold and a dispute filed with eBay.
|
Ford Falcon for Sale
- Ford falcon deluxe(US $11,500.00)
- Ford falcon two door bucket seat and console no reserve
- 1965 ford falcon gasser 400 call now same owner 42 years race car museum(US $34,495.00)
- Clean in and out! great runner! don't miss out on this great falcon ranchero!!
- 66 ford falcon 351w gtxy
- 1962 ford falcon 2 door ! a/c nice driver or full restore . priced to sell fast(US $3,500.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Wilson`s Davison Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Wade`s Automotive ★★★★★
Village Ford Inc ★★★★★
Village Ford ★★★★★
U P Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Recalls Nearly 700,000 Vehicles
Fri, May 9 2014Ford is recalling more than 692,000 Escape small SUVs and C-Max gas-electric hybrids in North America to fix two safety problems. The recalls cover vehicles from the 2013 and 2014 model years. Most of the Escapes have both problems. The first case covers 692,500 Escape and C-Max vehicles. A software glitch can stop the side curtain air bags from inflating in certain types of rollover crashes. The company says it has no reports of crashes or injuries. Dealers will reprogram the air bag control computer for free. About 65,000 of the recalled vehicles are C-Max models, and the rest are Escapes. Roughly 591,000 are in the U.S., with 3,500 more in U.S. territories. About 78,000 are in Canada and another 19,500 are in Mexico, Fordspokeswoman Kelli Felker said in an e-mail. There could be more vehicles affected in other markets, the company said. The affected Escapes were built from Oct. 5, 2011 through Feb. 14, 2014. The C-Max vehicles were built from Jan. 19, 2012, through Feb. 24, 2014. The second case covers about 692,700 Escapes. Exterior door handles can bind and stop the door from latching properly. This could allow doors to open while the SUVs are in motion. Dealers will inspect the handles and reposition them if needed. No crashes or injuries have been reported. About 583,000 are in the U.S. or its territories, with another 89,500 in Canada and 20,000 in Mexico. Ford said in this case, the problem may affect vehicles in other markets. All the North American Escapes were built from Oct. 5, 2011, through April 10, 2014. Recalls Ford escape
VW going turbo-only in 3 to 4 years
Wed, 18 Sep 2013This really was a matter of when, rather than if. Volkswagen will apparently be the first manufacturer to phase out naturally aspirated engines in favor of turbocharging its full slate. VW is kind of responsible for ushering in this push towards small-displacement, turbocharged engines that's taken the industry by storm. When it dropped its direct-injection, 2.0-liter turbo in the 2005 GTI it demonstrated that strapping an iron long to an engine can enhance the powertrain as a whole. VW made fuel economy gains, while also giving a linear, non-laggy turbo experience that it has replicated, model-after-model, to this day.
Speaking with The Detroit News, Volkswagen's executive Vice President of Group Quality, Marc Trahan, told the paper that, "We only have one normally aspirated gas engine, and when we go to the next generation vehicle that it's in, it will be replaced. So three, four years maximum."
Really, it's hard to get teary-eyed about either of these engines going away. VW has access to smaller powerplants that could easily match the performance of the 2.5 five-cylinder and the 3.6 V6, while gobbling up less fuel and providing a better driving experience. What we are sad about is that a similar statement about the extinction of NA engines came from the Vice President of Powertrain Engineering at Ford, Joe Bakaj. We'd certainly get teary-eyed over a world without Ford's excellent 5.0-liter V8.
American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings
Fri, 10 May 2013Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.