1965 Ford Falcon 2 Dr Sedan, No Rust Southern Car, Very Nice Driver on 2040-cars
West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States
Body Type:2 door sedan
Engine:200 ci 6 cyl
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: White
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 6
Model: Falcon
Trim: base
Drive Type: auto
Mileage: 98,000
Exterior Color: Teal
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Here is my 65 Falcon. It has been a southern rust free car its whole life. It is an unmolested original driven 2000 miles per year since new. It is a great driver that needs nothing. The only thing you could do would be maybe a paint job as this current paint job was not the best. It looks good from 15 feet. I was repainted about 12 years ago over the original paint.
Ford Falcon for Sale
- 64 coupe ht blue with thursh side pipes , 302 v8 needs wiring harness(US $4,500.00)
- 1964 ford falcon srint convertible factory 4 speed l@@k(US $29,900.00)
- 1963 ford falcon sedan delivery base 2.4l(US $6,000.00)
- 1964 ford falcon(US $8,000.00)
- Very sharp restorod, built 302 auto.,silver with a gray tweed interior.
- 1961 ford ranchero base 2.8l firethorn red
Auto Services in Massachusetts
VIP Parts, Tires & Service ★★★★★
Symphony Motors ★★★★★
Stoughton Auto Repair ★★★★★
Sonny`s Glass Tinting ★★★★★
Scott`s Auto Body ★★★★★
Samuels Jaguar Motors ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Mondeo with 1.5-liter EcoBoost debuts in China
Sat, 20 Apr 2013Does the car above, posing fancifully in white, look familiar? Well, it should. Although it wears Mondeo badges in the form you see above for the Chinese market - as it does in Europe - the car is basically the same thing sold in the US as the Ford Fusion. Of course, it's what's under that shapely skin that counts.
Ford has chosen the Shanghai Motor Show as the venue with which to unveil its 1.5-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine. We'd heard about the engine before, but now we have a few performance estimates to share: 133 kW of power (about 178 horsepower) and 240 Nm of torque (about 177 pound-feet).
Those numbers pretty much confirm previous rumors indicating about 177 in each category, and it's right on par with what Ford's own 1.6-liter EcoBoost produces. Ford is claiming best-in-class fuel economy as well, but no specific figures have yet been provided. In any case, we'll surely have all the data soon enough, as the 1.5-liter mill is destined for the US Fusion in 2014.
Question of the Day: Most degraded car name?
Fri, May 27 2016When Ford came up with a not-so-sporty version of the Pinto and slapped Mustang badges on it in 1974, that was a low point for the Mustang name. When Chrysler applied the venerable Town & Country name on perfectly functional but unglamorous minivans, it saddened many of us. But perhaps the biggest demotion for a once-proud model came when, in 1988, General Motors imported a misery-enhancing Daewoo from Korea and called it the Pontiac LeMans. The original Pontiac LeMans was a great-looking midsize car with fairly advanced (for the time) suspension design and engine options including potent V8s and a screaming overhead-cam straight-six. The Daewoo-based Pontiac LeMans was a cramped, shoddy hooptie that served only to ruin the LeMans name forever, while stealing sales from the Suzuki-based Chevrolet Sprint. Sure, using the once-respected Monterey name on the Mercurized Ford Freestar was bad, but Mercury didn't have long to live at that point. I say the downward spiral of the LeMans name was the most agonizing in automotive history. What do you think? Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Auto News Ford Mercury Pontiac Automotive History Classics questions ford pinto names
American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings
Fri, 10 May 2013Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.