1964 Ford Falcon Futura 4.3l on 2040-cars
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:U/K
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
Mileage: 1,000
Make: Ford
Sub Model: Futura 2 door hard top
Model: Falcon
Exterior Color: Silver
Trim: Futura
Interior Color: Blue
Drive Type: U/K
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
I have a 1964 Ford Falcon 2 door hardtop V8 car that I have had for 7 years for sale. The following has been done to it:
1) upgraded suspension (sway bars in front and back, lowered coil springs in back and upgraded shocks all the way around)
2) Disc break kit on front from SSBC company
3) Built 302 with MSD, demon carb, full headers, comp cam, aluminum radiator, and other items on engine
4) C4 transmission with shift kit in it.
5) flow-master exhaust system
6) touque thrust II wheels.
7) professional paint just completed late last year.
8) new carpet and sound/heat mats installed.
Bad news - does not run. Once the paint job was done I started driving it more. Engine had less than 2K miles on it I'd say and a Rod broke. I have got under it and seen that there is block damage and the crank has some gouges in it from where the other rod slid over after the incident. I think it will need a new short block. I built the engine and then did the expensive paint job so I wouldn't have to take the engine out after that. I had the short block built and the machine shop and I think I just had a bad part as the engine was still breaking in so I was not hot rodding it.
I have over 15K invested in it but I've lost interest at this time to mess with it. I don't need to sell it so I will not entertain any low ball offers as I don't see going lower than I have listed.
Ford Falcon for Sale
Auto Services in Tennessee
White`s Towing & Recovery ★★★★★
Universal Kia Franklin ★★★★★
United Auto Service ★★★★★
Transmissions INC ★★★★★
The Wash Spot Inc ★★★★★
Solar Pros Window Tinting ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy
Thu, Jan 8 2015With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.
STUDY: Ford owns brand loyalty in 2009; Scorned Saturn, Pontiac buyers will look outside of GM
Fri, 16 Oct 2009Ford buyers appear to love their cars more than customers of any other automotive brand, returning back to the American automaker when it comes time to purchase their next vehicle. According to a study by Experian Automotive, six of the top 10 vehicles for customer brand loyalty wear badges from the Blue Oval. That includes the Ford Fusion (62.4 percent), Ford Edge (57.9 percent), Ford Five Hundred/Taurus (56 percent), Ford Freestyle (51.9 percent), Ford Escape (49.4 percent) and the Ford Focus (47.57 percent).
Other vehicles making up the top 10 include the Toyota Prius (52 percent), Chevy Impala (51.7 percent), Toyota Camry (47.8 percent) and Toyota Corolla (47.56 percent). This brings up an interesting question: With the closing of automotive brands like Saturn and Pontiac, where are those buyers to turn for their next automotive purchase?
Apparently, not back to General Motors. According to Experian, Pontiac owners are most likely to look to the Ford lineup for their next car or truck and Saturn shoppers will switch to Toyota or Honda - not particularly surprising given that Saturn was meant to compete with import brands. Experian predicts that GM's overall market share will fall from 20 percent to about 17.5 percent, with most of the slack being picked up by Ford, Honda and Toyota.
Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch
Tue, 16 Jul 2013A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.