1962 Falcon Street Rod, Hot Rod, Rat Rod on 2040-cars
Stoystown, Pennsylvania, United States
Engine:351 windsor
Year: 1962
Drive Type: rear
Make: Ford
Mileage: 83,000
Model: Falcon
Warranty: none
Trim: futura
This is a 1962 Ford Falcon. The floor boards, quarters,
doors, trunk all show no signs of rust
holes or patching. The paint is driver quality with some dings, blemishes and
scratches. The paint is 7 years old, it is base coat clear and is very shiny.
The hood, doors and trunk all line up and shut properly. The rear wheel well
lips have been flattened to accommodate the Ford 8” rear and the wider tires
but they are solid and not cut just flattened. The frame rails have been tied together for a higher
horsepower engine The glass is tinted and all in good condition. The interior
was completely redone and is in good condition. It is dark leather ostrich
print with plain leather gray outer covering. The headliner and door panels all
match. Engine is a rebuilt 1971 Ford 351 Windsor bored .030 with a
mild cam. Stock heads and an aluminum intake, 650 HOLLEY carb. Engine was never
dinoed. I would guess about 375 to 400
HP. This is a nice driver motor not too much power. Cam sounds great and good
on gas. Car runs cool with a 1971 Mustang radiator. Motor, trans and rear do
not drip oil. Transmission is a C4 auto with a 2000 stall. HURST Quarter
stick shifter. Rear end is a ford 8” with 279 gear for highway driving. We did
have a 355 gear in it and it was kind of low for highway traveling. All lights, turn signals, back up lights, gas guage, window winds work.
Brakes are next to new. We have just painted the wheels black and installed four new
tires, Rear -235/60/14, Front 205/70/14. We also added a ford rocker stripe and
a new set of air shocks to raise the rear 3”. That is the way the car is being
sold. In the one video from last month the car had silver wheels and sat lower so I
don’t want to confuse anyone The following is a list of what does not work SPEEDOMETER- No cable attached C4 & falcon don’t match
up. RADIO- This was a radio delete car. No antenna hole and
installed radio not wired EMERGENCY BRAKE- Cable from lever to first connection is
missing. But the cable from there to the drums is there and works HEATER- The core is missing but the blower motor works on
high and low. It just need the core put in. I tried to the best of my ability to describe this car
accurately. It is a nice street rod, driver ready. If you come to pick the car up and you feel that I misrepresented
the car, YOU DON’T HAVE TO TAKE IT! |
Ford Falcon for Sale
- 1961 ford falcon 2 door(US $1,500.00)
- 1963 1/2 ford falcon sprint convertible 260 cu.in. v8 4spd. original black plate
- 302 ci, red on red conv, power top, 4-wheel disc, 3:50 rear, torque thrust!(US $18,995.00)
- 1963 ford falcon no motor or transmission
- 1965 ford falcon base 2.8l
- 1960 ford falcon two door sedan
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
World Class Transmission Svc ★★★★★
Wood`s Locksmithing ★★★★★
Trust Auto Sales ★★★★★
Steele`s Truck & Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Hills Lincoln Mercury ★★★★★
Auto blog
Watch how a Ford Raptor rolls down the assembly line in Dearborn
Sun, 30 Mar 2014Bloomberg TV reporter Matt Miller is the proud new owner of a pretty killer truck. How do we know? The reporter headed to Dearborn, MI to Ford's assembly plant, with a film crew in tow, to see exactly how his new F-150 SVT Raptor and its mother-loving 6.2-liter V8 engine, was screwed together.
The resulting video does an excellent job of summing up how an assemblage of parts and pieces is turned into a triple-black Raptor, thanks to the work of some 1,000 employees and about 20 hours of real time. Click through below to see how the truck is born, with a surprise cameo playing the part of delivery driver at the end.
Peel and Ford Transit do a great Austin Powers impression
Tue, May 6 2014It's no secret that the average fullsize cargo van is big. Like, really big. Expressing that size, though, without actually seeing the van in question, is a pretty tall order. When viewed from the right angle, even something as big as a cargo van can appear very small (look up forced perspective, to see what we mean). That's why it's always good to have a second object on hand, to provide a sense of scale. Ford took this simple idea to the extreme, illustrating the size of the new Ford Transit by pulling the world's smallest production car, the Peel P50, nose first into the van's 487-cubic-foot cargo area. That's no big deal, though, right? After all, at just 54 inches long and 39 inches wide, the Peel would fit quite happily in even the smallest fullsize truck bed. Ford takes it a step further, though. With the help of an actual reverse gear (we're guessing this is a CVT-equipped, electric model), the P50 manages to turn itself around and drive out. It does this in less than two minutes. So yeah, the Ford Transit is a pretty big van. Take a look below for the video from Ford. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Related Gallery Peel P-50 and Trident News Source: fordvideo1 via YouTube Auto News Humor Ford Minivan/Van Commercial Vehicles Videos ford transit
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.05 s, 7797 u