Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1960 Ford Falcon Turbo Inline-6 2.4l 3-speed Transmission Classic on 2040-cars

US $4,995.00
Year:1960 Mileage:13357 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Denver, Colorado, United States

Denver, Colorado, United States
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 0R115136552 Year: 1960
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Falcon
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 13,357
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Blue
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Colorado

Zarlingo`s Automotive Svc Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 748 Horizon Dr, Loma
Phone: (970) 242-1691

Toy Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: Black-Hawk
Phone: (720) 288-0989

Tony`s Tires & Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 3800 N Garfield Ave, Masonville
Phone: (970) 667-2435

Tire Stop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 4727 Broadway St Ste C, Louisville
Phone: (303) 449-0581

Rocket Express ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Car Wash
Address: 13074 W Ida Ave # A1, Indian-Hills
Phone: (303) 972-3800

Rio Grande Enterprises, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Hotels
Address: 24263 Highway 149, Creede
Phone: (719) 658-0374

Auto blog

Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move

Tue, Dec 6 2016

With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.

Ford to rebrand SVT as 999?

Mon, 22 Sep 2014

Ford operates a number of performance divisions around the world. There's SVT in the US, Team RS in Europe and Ford Performance Vehicles (FPV) in Australia. But the Blue Oval has been steadily integrating its performance operations into one unit, and here we might have our first indication of what it will be called.
A reader at Jalopnik sent in a survey in which respondents were asked to gauge the name for a new performance brand from a "major automotive manufacturer," and while the identity of that automaker was not disclosed, according to the survey, the automaker is considering the name 999 for its new go-fast unit.
As our compatriots point out, the 999 was Ford's first racecar, a rudimentary chassis with a 19-liter inline-four campaigned by Henry Ford around the turn of the 20th century. (Ford also used the number to designate a Fusion fuel-cell racer a few years back.) That could prove the tie-in Dearborn is looking for in rebranding its performance operations worldwide, replacing the letters SVT, RS and FPV globally under one name.

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

Thu, 02 May 2013

No Prius Killer
As much as we enthusiasts like to rail on the lowly Toyota Prius as the harbinger of death for all we hold dear, there's no denying the machine's absolute and interminable grip on the hybrid hatchback market in the United States. Toyota has so thoroughly sunk its teeth into the segment that you can clearly hear the automaker's incisors clacking against one another with the conclusion of each financial quarter. And there's little wonder why. Buyers can plop down less than $25,000 and have a runabout that can return up to an estimated 51 miles per gallon in the city, leaving every other entry on the market with precious little gristle to gnaw on.
Enter the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. With its claimed 47 mpg combined, the funky little hatch from Europe already falls behind the 48 mpg city offered by the Prius, but that marginal sacrifice in fuel economy could be a small price to pay for buyers who want a credible alternative to the stalwart Toyota. Unfortunately, like the Fusion Hybrid, the C-Max Hybrid had trouble even approaching its Environmental Protection Agency estimates during our time with the car.