Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1957 Ford Fairlane Base 5.1l on 2040-cars

Year:1957 Mileage:86000 Color: trim is included
Location:

Novi, Michigan, United States

Novi, Michigan, United States
Advertising:

I bought this car from Utah it was a Father/Son project that didn't get finished. It was my intention to do the same this year after retiring, but I've agreed to stay with company until the end of 2015. Now I won't have the time this car needs. I am also listing my 1957 Skyliner retractable for sale. This car is a great base to restore. Body is in great condition. It was said the engine and trans were rebuild, but haven't been able to verify. I put a new battery in this morning and she started right up and ran very smoothly. I've had several Y blocks and this one runs very nicely. Top frame is in excellent condition just needs recovering. Needs complete exhaust system. Tires are good. Interior needs finishing. All exterior trim is included. Previous owner painted it the current color, but is not a very good job. Floors and trunk are great. Again this is a project, but can be restored to your level or driven as you go along. I work hard for my 100% feedback so if there are any questions or if additional pictures are needed do not hesitate to contact me at 248-379-0592. I've put a very fair reserve on the car and it is also for sale locally so the listing may end at any time. Thanks for looking. Mike   

Auto Services in Michigan

Westside Transmission Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 5781 Westside Saginaw Rd, Reese
Phone: (989) 667-0120

Venom Motorsports Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Customizing
Address: Hale
Phone: (616) 635-2519

Vanderhoof`s Small Eng Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 277 Old US Highway 131, Leroy
Phone: (231) 832-3445

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 5030 W Saginaw Hwy, Dimondale
Phone: (517) 321-2822

U S Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 2346 W Warren Ave, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 894-1194

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 90 S Waverly Rd, Holland
Phone: (616) 394-0880

Auto blog

Ford Shelby GT350R, GT successor, F-150 Raptor and more rumored for Detroit debut

Mon, Dec 1 2014

According to a pair of reports from Hearst's car mags, Car and Driver and Road & Track, Ford has a whole mess of good stuff on deck for the Detroit Auto Show in January. And it all sounds awesome. First, expect to see a hotter version of the Shelby GT350 in Detroit, likely called GT350R. Think of this as the already-hot Shelby with even more track-focused bits baked in – brakes, tires, aero, etc. Everything about the GT350 sounds great, so expect this R variant to be something seriously fierce. As R&T suggests, if the GT350 is the company's new Boss 302, the R is the Laguna Seca. But that's not even close to the biggest news. Road & Track believes a proper Ford GT replacement will debut in Detroit – a road-going version of the Le Mans GTE-class car the Blue Oval is working on for 2016. We've heard about this before, but having the street-legal car debut in Detroit would be absolutely huge news. The performance story continues, though, with R&T suggesting that the next-gen Ford F-150 Raptor will bow in Detroit. Details are scarce about what, exactly, the aluminum-bodied desert stormer will hold, but we expect good things. Finally, Ford's hot hatches might make some news in the Motor City, too. Car and Driver seems to think the all-wheel-drive Focus RS will bow in The D, and that an updated version of the Fiesta ST will also show its face. Road & Track, meanwhile, believes the Focus RS showing will be saved for a European auto show – think Geneva – and our gut feeling is to agree with the R&T theory. All of these rumors point to Ford officially announcing its dedicated performance division – like Mercedes-AMG, BMW M, and so on. We've heard reports of a new, global performance brand from the company already, with the name 999 thrown out as a possibility. In any case, if these rumblings prove to be true, there's going to be a ton to drool over from Ford in January. Stay tuned.

Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015

Mon, 10 Feb 2014

Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper.
For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011.
The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.