Ford F450 Superduty on 2040-cars
Dacula, Georgia, United States
Engine:6.0 diesel
Drive Type: Auto
Make: Ford
Mileage: 110,000
Model: F-450
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: xl
2006 Ford F450 Superduty Flatbed. 6.0 Bullet proofed Diesel. I bought this truck and had Egr delete kit put on with Black diamond head gaskets, Head bolts, new oil cooler. This truck will run and has unbelievable torque. Interior is in great shape. Ac, cd player. No dents, and no major scratches on paint. Also has new brakes all the way around. It has a crack in wind shield. Needs two new tires in 5000 miles or so. Truck has 110,000 miles.
Ford F-450 for Sale
- 1994 ford f super duty xl cab & chassis 2-door 7.3l 58,900 orignal miles
- Ford f450xl flatbed dump truck aluminum bed hoist dually auto ac v10 low miles
- Lariat 4x4 diesel leather sunroof navigation heated seats crewcab new tires(US $24,900.00)
- 2001 ford f 550 4x4 super duty 7.3 turbo diesel powerstroke utility dually truck(US $11,000.00)
- Powerstroke diesel flat bed crew cab 1 owner wholesale $12,990 call 866-299-2347(US $12,990.00)
- 2007ford super duty f-550 drw 4x4 powerstroke diesel custom conversion(US $22,900.00)
Auto Services in Georgia
Wishen Motors ★★★★★
WILLIE & BATMAN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE ★★★★★
William Mizell Ford ★★★★★
W.T. Standard & Assoc. ★★★★★
Unlimited Motor Cars ★★★★★
Toyota Mall Of Georgia ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford files trademark application for 'Model E'
Fri, 27 Dec 2013In early December, Ford filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the name "Model E." Historically, Ford never produced a Model E, and while automakers are known to file for trademarks they never use, some have wondered if the application might be used for a concept car.
Based on other recent events, though, it could be a legal move. In 2000 Ford sued an online start-up called Model E over the similarity of that name to Ford's industry-shaping Model T, but the judge dismissed the case citing lack of proper grounds. In August 2013, Tesla applied for trademark registration for Model E, and at the time, Ford said it would review the application. Tesla actually made two applications for Model E, one for automobiles and structural parts therefore, the other for "providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles," and there are plenty of theories about what the name could be applied to.
The Published for Opposition date for Tesla's applications is December 31, 2013, after which anyone who thinks they'd be harmed by Tesla being granted the trademark gets 30 days to register their issues. This is just speculation, but Ford's application - which was filed for automobiles only - might be about protecting what it sees as unwelcome encroachment on the name Model T, protection it wasn't able to enforce before when the stakes were only online and much smaller.
Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]
Mon, 22 Jul 2013Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.
Ford board pushing Mulally for decision amidst fears story is drowning out other news
Thu, 12 Dec 2013Automakers and their executives rarely like to divulge information regarding future goings on, but the board of directors at Ford sound like they're getting a little antsy about chief executive officer Alan Mulally and his plans for 2014.
According to Reuters, as news of Mulally's possible departure to Microsoft continues to swirl, Ford's board is looking to push the affable executive to make a decision about his future sooner rather than later. Apparently, the board is growing concerned that this will-he/won't-he drama may end up distracting the media from covering Ford's other big news events next year - items like the debut of key all-new products like the Mustang and F-150.
So far, the picture for Mulally's eventual successor remains fuzzy, but it's understood that the leading candidate remains the company's chief operating officer, Mark Fields. Just recently, we heard that Mulally will stay until the end of 2014, but a few months ago, Ford seemed open to the idea of him stepping down earlier than that.