Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Ford F450 Super Duty Wrecker on 2040-cars

Year:2008 Mileage:77189
Location:

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Southfield, Michigan, United States

LOW MILES! 77,189 ACTUAL MILES!  2008 FORD F-650 WRECKER / SUPER DUTY / 6.4 LITER DIESEL RUNS EXCELLENT! WITH AUTOMATIC ALLISON TRANSMISSION / LIGHT DUTY WRECKER / VULCAN STRAPLESS WHEEL LIFT / EXTENDABLE BOOM WITH SLING / SINGLE WINCH / STRONG RUNNING TRUCK / RIDE IN COMFORT / AIR CONDITIONING WORKS GREAT! / AM-FM-CD / ALL POWER, WINDOWS, BRAKES, STEERING, DRIVER'S SEAT, /  GREAT WORK TRUCK / REAL MONEY MAKER / 225-70R19.5 TIRES HAVE 80% TREAD ON THEM / NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR, DOLLIES AND GO JACKS INCLUDED.  WE HAVE ORDERED A MEDIUM DUTY WRECKER TO REPLACE THIS TRUCK AND WON'T NEED IT ANYMORE.  THIS IS A 1 OWNER VEHICLE, WELL MAINTAINED, ALL SERVICE RECORDS AVAILABLE. EMAIL YOUR QUESTIONS AND WE'LL RESPOND SOON AS WE CAN.  

Auto Services in Michigan

Wilkins Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 7052 Gratiot Ave, Fair-Haven
Phone: (810) 367-6818

White Jim Honda ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1505 Reynolds Rd, Lambertville
Phone: (419) 893-5581

Wetland Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Construction Consultants, Automobile Salvage
Address: 9507 Dorr St, Ottawa-Lake
Phone: (419) 867-8535

Vinsetta Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Electrical Equipment
Address: 27799 Woodward Ave, East-Detroit
Phone: (248) 548-7711

Viers Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Car Wash
Address: 1897 N Lapeer Rd, Lapeer
Phone: (810) 667-5447

Tom Holzer Ford Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 39300 W 10 Mile Rd, White-Lake
Phone: (248) 474-1234

Auto blog

2016 Ford Taurus to ride atop reworked Fusion platform

Wed, 19 Mar 2014

Generally, cars get bigger and heavier as they get older. That's why it looks so ridiculous when you park a classic Mini next to a modern version. The same can be said of the Corvette, the BMW 3 Series, Porsche 911 and, of course, the Ford Taurus. In the Taurus' case, though, that size has become a liability, particularly because the big brute isn't nearly as sizable on the inside as it is on the out.
For 2016, Ford is aiming to rectify that. According to Edmunds, the 2016 Taurus will ride on a stretched and widened Ford Fusion platform. Ford is expecting this move to go a long way in trimming the Taurus' ample body fat.
"The problem with today's Taurus is that it is overweight and even the high performance SHO is not really competitive," said a source that spoke to Edmunds on condition of anonymity. The 365-horsepower SHO variant, "actually weighs about as much as the stretched Audi A8 L. Of course, Audi uses an extensive amount of aluminum, but it is a much bigger car."

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]

Mon, 22 Jul 2013

Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.