Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

~~05~ford~f-450~4x4~diesel~24.5~alcoas~serviced~lifted~nice~no~reserve~~ on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:222500 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Frankford, Delaware, United States

Frankford, Delaware, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:6.0L Powerstroke Turbo diesel
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
VIN: 1fdxx47p65ec96104 Year: 2005
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-450
Trim: XLT
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Drive Type: 4x4
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Mileage: 222,500
Exterior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Delaware

Weathers Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1187 W Baltimore Pike, Arden
Phone: (610) 566-5475

SUNOCO ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Fax Service, Grocery Stores
Address: 401 E Baltimore Ave, Arden
Phone: (484) 461-7733

Scott Carter Enterprise ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Automobile Manufacturers Equipment & Supplies
Address: 114 Washington Ave, Yorklyn
Phone: (610) 873-2975

Piazza Acura of West Chester ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1330 Wilmington Pike, Yorklyn
Phone: (610) 399-9500

Newark Toyota World ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 400 Ogletown Rd, Newark
Phone: (302) 368-6262

D & C Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: Routes 9 & Alternate 13, Laurel
Phone: (302) 875-6500

Auto blog

Chrysler called out over lackluster Ram Runner by racer who helped develop it

Fri, 11 Apr 2014

Fans of off-roading and desert blasting might recall that Chrysler offers an aftermarket conversion that can turn a Ram 1500 into a road-legal desert racer, called the Ram Runner. The kit, sold through Mopar, includes some significant suspension upgrades, body tweaks and a brawnier cat-back exhaust for the truck's 5.7-liter V8.
Considering all of this, comparisons with the almighty Ford F-150 SVT Raptor are common. Among the off-road community, that makes these two a sort of Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang for people that prefer driving on dirt. In the Race-Dezert forum, the discussion as to which truck was better was proceeding as normal - Ram fans said their piece and Ford fans said theirs. Then, a man named Kent Kroeker offered up his two cents.
See, Kroeker is a Baja racer, and the man that helped develop the Ram Runner. Despite his association with the truck, though, he had some less than kind words for Chrysler and the Ram Runner.

Facelifted Ford Focus caught testing in the cold

Wed, 18 Dec 2013

It's that time in the life of the Ford Focus to get a little work done - a nip-tuck here, some Botox there. Yes, Ford is testing a facelifted version of its global C-segment entry, which first hit markets in Europe and North America in May 2011.
Like the touchup on the Fiesta, expect Ford's gaping grille to make its first appearance on the Focus. Our spy photographers point out that this is likely to be a more comprehensive makeover than previous spy shots suggested, based on the additional camouflage seen here on the front and rear ends of this five-door model. New head and taillights are also likely in order, as are changes to the front and rear fascia.
The interior was also snapped and features a cleaner design with a larger central display. Other than that, it looks like some buttons have been changed, making us think most of the Focus' updates are limited to the exterior.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.