Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

One Owner Perfect Carfax All Highway Miles Original Msrp $51365 on 2040-cars

US $30,900.00
Year:2012 Mileage:141729 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Marion, Arkansas, United States

Marion, Arkansas, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:6.7L 32-VALVE PWR STROKE V8 DIESEL ENGINE
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FT8W3DT0CEB72155
Year: 2012
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Mileage: 141,729
Sub Model: XL Crew Cab FX4 Powerstroke Diesel
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Doors: 4

Auto Services in Arkansas

Wayne`s Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1510 E 9th St, Texarkana
Phone: (870) 779-0308

Texarkana Glass Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Address: 3222 Texas Blvd, Washington
Phone: (903) 793-4277

Tcc Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1 Voorhees Dr, Gravel-Ridge
Phone: (501) 771-2341

T.T.S. Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Lifts-Automotive & Truck
Address: 3406 S.E. J, Hiwasse
Phone: (479) 464-8284

Pruitt`s Auto Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Automobile Accessories
Address: 224 County Road 311, Jonesboro
Phone: (870) 935-4646

Northwest Arkansas Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 276 E Main St, Farmington
Phone: (479) 267-5007

Auto blog

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

Does the new 2015 Ford Mustang have a burnout control system?

Tue, 10 Dec 2013

Whether it's lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring or automatic emergency braking, most of the electronic systems we see emerging on new vehicles focus on safety. But there are some there just for enthusiasts. We're talking about systems like automatic throttle blipping for perfect downshifts, or launch control to get that textbook acceleration from a standstill. But the latest system could prove just the opposite of the latter.
Although it has given us most of the details, Ford is still keeping certain elements of its new Mustang secret. But emerging reports may have the skinny on one system which Ford is trying is darnedest to keep under its hat for the time being. That, according to unnamed sources cited by Motor Authority, is burnout control.
The system is reportedly designed to help novices execute the perfect smokey burnout - sort of like launch control, but specifically the opposite. The system could, according to elaborative speculation, lock the front brakes while spooling up the engine to optimal revolutions before dumping (or indicating the driver to do dump) the clutch. A cloud of tire smoke and a long pair of skid marks would then ensue.

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.