Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Ford F350 Xlt on 2040-cars

US $27,950.00
Year:2011 Mileage:118013 Color: White
Location:

5697 W Broadway, McCordsville, Indiana, United States

5697 W Broadway, McCordsville, Indiana, United States
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT8W3B69BEA16496
Stock Num: 14774A
Make: Ford
Model: F350 XLT
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: White
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 35.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 80.8"
  • Overall Width: 80.0"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power steering
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.8"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 42.1"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Trailer hitch
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 118013

AutoCheck Vehicle History Reports available for our complete pre-owned inventory through our website www.StanleyChevy.com. Since opening our doors in 1965 we have maintained our solid commitment to our customers, offering the widest selection of cars and trucks and ease of purchase. Please contact us with any questions. We look forward to doing business with you!

Auto Services in Indiana

Zamudio Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 4151 S Kedzie Ave, Whiting
Phone: (773) 847-8786

Westgate Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2695 E Main St, Plainfield
Phone: (317) 839-6554

Tom Roush Lincoln Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 525 David Brown Dr, Castleton
Phone: (866) 869-7884

Tim`s Wrecker Service & Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Truck Wrecking
Address: Millhousen
Phone: (812) 663-3159

Superior Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: 19948 State Line Rd, Notre-Dame
Phone: (574) 277-7002

Stan`s Auto Electric Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 5115 E 30th St, Wanamaker
Phone: (317) 545-8537

Auto blog

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

Thu, 02 May 2013

No Prius Killer
As much as we enthusiasts like to rail on the lowly Toyota Prius as the harbinger of death for all we hold dear, there's no denying the machine's absolute and interminable grip on the hybrid hatchback market in the United States. Toyota has so thoroughly sunk its teeth into the segment that you can clearly hear the automaker's incisors clacking against one another with the conclusion of each financial quarter. And there's little wonder why. Buyers can plop down less than $25,000 and have a runabout that can return up to an estimated 51 miles per gallon in the city, leaving every other entry on the market with precious little gristle to gnaw on.
Enter the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. With its claimed 47 mpg combined, the funky little hatch from Europe already falls behind the 48 mpg city offered by the Prius, but that marginal sacrifice in fuel economy could be a small price to pay for buyers who want a credible alternative to the stalwart Toyota. Unfortunately, like the Fusion Hybrid, the C-Max Hybrid had trouble even approaching its Environmental Protection Agency estimates during our time with the car.

Ford spotted testing new Focus RS at the Nurburgring

Thu, 26 Jun 2014

Ford is expected to be launching a revised version of the Focus ST soon, but the latest snapshots from our spy photographers at the Nürburgring suggest that the Blue Oval is already working on an even more potent example: the new Focus RS.
Though the partially disguised test mule is wearing an ST badge (along with a Dewey sticker that makes us wonder what adventures Huey and Louie are up to and what manner of duck-tail rear spoiler they may be wearing), there are several tell-tale signs that something else is afoot here. There's a larger front air dam, bigger brake calipers, dual exhaust tips (instead of the central exhaust on the ST) and a reshaped wing protruding from the trailing edge of the roof.
That may all be well and fine, but what's under the hood? We don't know yet for sure, but word has it that Ford is preparing to port over the 2.3-liter turbo four offered in the new Mustang, where it packs 305 horsepower and almost as much torque - potentially retuned to produce even more for the top-of-the-line Focus, which could channel it all to the front wheels like the last model or pack an all-wheel drive system. The Global C platform on which the Focus is based does, after all, also underpin AWD models like the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.