Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Ford F350 on 2040-cars

US $7,977.00
Year:2004 Mileage:190887 Color: Oxford White /
 Medium Parchment
Location:

7952 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

7952 Veterans Memorial Pkwy, Saint Peters, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.8L V10 20V MPFI SOHC
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FDSX34S54ED47099
Stock Num: P4926
Make: Ford
Model: F350
Year: 2004
Exterior Color: Oxford White
Interior Color: Medium Parchment
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Curb weight: 5,432 lbs.
  • Diameter of tires: 16.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 41.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.4"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 40.7"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 40.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 9,900 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Manual extendable trailer style exterior mirrors
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 75.9"
  • Overall Length: 246.7"
  • Overall Width: 80.0"
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Rear Head Room: 38.5"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 32.4"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Split rear bench
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Profile: 75
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 265 mm
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 7
  • Wheelbase: 162.0"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 190887

Not from the St. Louis? No problem, we can ship your purchase anywhere in the continental U.S. for FREE! Call today at 888-612-7311!

Auto Services in Missouri

Wright Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 109 James St, Ferrelview
Phone: (816) 532-8982

Wilson auto repair & 24-HR towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: Watson
Phone: (816) 752-7357

Waggoner Motor Co ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers
Address: 408 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 866-2229

Vanzandt?ˆ™s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 N Grant Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4724 Hampton Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 352-5900

Todd`s & Mark`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1219 Caseyville Ave, Saint-Louis
Phone: (618) 233-9923

Auto blog

Your official Ford Transit specs are here, $29,565* to start

Wed, 04 Jun 2014

Ford has released the full list of pricing and specs on its new Transit, the replacement for the long-lived E-Series cargo van. Prices are set to start at $29,565 and can increase rapidly from there, depending on length, engine and wheelbase, among other options.
Let's talk first about those new engines. The base is the familiar 3.7-liter, naturally aspirated V6. It boasts 275 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque and can return up to 14 miles per gallon in the city and 19 mpg on the highway. This engine can also be adapted to run on LPG or compressed natural gas. Of course, there are better alternatives, for a price, the first of which is Ford's well-received, 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6. It packs 310 hp and a best-in-class 400 lb-ft of torque (available at just 2,500 rpm) while matching the naturally aspirated engine in both city and highway fuel economy.
Then, there's the diesel. With a 3.2-liter, five-cylinder diesel mill at its disposal, the Transit generates 350 lb-ft between 1,500 and 2,500 rpm, along with 185 hp. This engine hasn't been rated by the EPA, although we'd be really, really surprised if it didn't handily best either of the gas-powered engines in fuel efficiency. A six-speed automatic is standard, regardless of engine.

Mulally wanted to kill Lincoln as late as last year, Fields vows to turn it around

Mon, 30 Jun 2014

Lincoln fans might want to give incoming Ford CEO Mark Fields a pat on the back for having a hand in saving the brand from the chopping block last year. He's among the people spearheading the rejuvenation of the division away from its stodgy image to appeal to younger customers.
According to two unnamed sources speaking to Bloomberg, CEO Alan Mulally was ready to kill Lincoln last year. Following the slow production ramp-up of the MKZ combined a with a costly ad campaign, Mulally was frustrated and openly suggested dropping the brand. However, Fields and Jim Farley, Ford's marketing boss, convinced the CEO that the brand was worth saving. They also created a plan to prevent similar problems for new models in the future.
It seems that one part of the strategy may involve waiting until new models are at dealers before starting a big ad campaign for them. Lincoln global director, Matt VanDyke, recently told Autoblog that the division is holding off on a full marketing push behind the new MKC crossover to prevent the supply problems that plagued the MKZ last year. Its big offensive begins in the fall when the CUVs are at all of the dealers and consumers are at home watching more TV. VanDyke also told Bloomberg that Fields, Farley and Joe Hinrichs, Ford president of the Americas, have more direct oversight over new product launches now.

The next-generation wearable will be your car

Fri, Jan 8 2016

This year's CES has had a heavy emphasis on the class of device known as the "wearable" – think about the Apple Watch, or Fitbit, if that's helpful. These devices usually piggyback off of a smartphone's hardware or some other data connection and utilize various onboard sensors and feedback devices to interact with the wearer. In the case of the Fitbit, it's health tracking through sensors that monitor your pulse and movement; for the Apple Watch and similar devices, it's all that and some more. Manufacturers seem to be developing a consensus that vehicles should be taking on some of a wearable's functionality. As evidenced by Volvo's newly announced tie-up with the Microsoft Band 2 fitness tracking wearable, car manufacturers are starting to explore how wearable devices will help drivers. The On Call app brings voice commands, spoken into the Band 2, into the mix. It'll allow you to pass an address from your smartphone's agenda right to your Volvo's nav system, or to preheat your car. Eventually, Volvo would like your car to learn things about your routines, and communicate back to you – or even, improvise to help you wake up earlier to avoid that traffic that might make you late. Do you need to buy a device, like the $249 Band 2, and always wear it to have these sorts of interactions with your car? Despite the emphasis on wearables, CES 2016 has also given us a glimmer of a vehicle future that cuts out the wearable middleman entirely. Take Audi's new Fit Driver project. The goal is to reduce driver stress levels, prevent driver fatigue, and provide a relaxing interior environment by adjusting cabin elements like seat massage, climate control, and even the interior lighting. While it focuses on a wearable device to monitor heart rate and skin temperature, the Audi itself will use on-board sensors to examine driving style and breathing rate as well as external conditions – the weather, traffic, that sort of thing. Could the seats measure skin temperature? Could the seatbelt measure heart rate? Seems like Audi might not need the wearable at all – the car's already doing most of the work. Whether there's a device on a driver's wrist or not, manufacturers seem to be developing a consensus that vehicles should be taking on some of a wearable's functionality.