Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford F-350 on 2040-cars

US $13,000.00
Year:2000 Mileage:112304 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Sikeston, Missouri, United States

Sikeston, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Flatbed
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:7.3 l power stroke diesel
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Manual
VIN: 1FDWF36F6YEA30894 Year: 2000
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Model: F-350
Trim: XL
Options: Cassette Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: 2 wheel drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Mileage: 112,304
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Number of Doors: 2
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

You are looking at a 2000 Ford F-350 dually 2 wheel drive with the popular 7.3 Powerstroke diesel with a 6 speed manual transmission. This truck has only 112304 miles and is ready to work. A 10' steel Knapheide flat bed makes for easy hauling and towing. It has a fold down gooseneck ball on the bed and a heavy duty reciever hitch on the back bumper. DOT reflective stripping wraps the bed for added safety and a working amber strobe light on the all steel headache rack. You will not find a cleaner truck than this one. 6 new steel wheels with 6 new 10 ply tires make this truck ready to hit the road with whatever you put on or behind it. The interior is gray with a rubber floor and a vinyl seat. This truck has been fleet maintenances and is ready to go. Exterior condition of the vehicle is good with one small dent on the bottom of the driver side front fender. 

A $1000.00 deposit is required within 48 hours of action end with the reamaining balance paid in full within days of auction end via cash or certified funds.

Delivery is available upon request at a rate of $3.00 per loaded mile.  

Auto Services in Missouri

Wright Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 109 James St, Ferrelview
Phone: (816) 532-8982

Wilson auto repair & 24-HR towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: Watson
Phone: (816) 752-7357

Waggoner Motor Co ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers
Address: 408 E Kearney St, Willard
Phone: (417) 866-2229

Vanzandt?ˆ™s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 N Grant Ave, Springfield
Phone: (417) 881-0101

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4724 Hampton Ave, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 352-5900

Todd`s & Mark`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1219 Caseyville Ave, Saint-Louis
Phone: (618) 233-9923

Auto blog

Ford gives S-Max the Vignale treatment in Milan

Wed, 09 Apr 2014

Ford has a bit of a history in reviving the names of old coachbuilders it has long since gobbled up and using them to distinguish its top-of-the-line models in Europe. That's what it did for years with Ghia, and after having replaced it several years ago with the Titanium trim level, now it's doing it again with Vignale.
At the Frankfurt Motor Show last year, Ford revealed the Mondeo Vignale concept in both sedan and wagon body-styles, which are set to reach production next year. But before they do, the Blue Oval automaker is at it again, applying similar upgrades to the S-Max minivan and unveiling it in concept form in Milan this week.
Setting the Vignale concept apart from any other S-Max is its Milano Grigio rose-hued silver pearlescent paint, 21-inch alloys, chrome trim and hexagonal-pattern grille. Inside it's all ultra-soft quilted leather and aluminum trim, with tablet docking stations in the back and thinner, more flexible seats than the existing production version.

Ford director says company has big efficiency plans, but no dedicated EV

Wed, Mar 12 2014

The annual autofest known as the North American International Auto Show previews a plethora of exciting new products that we'll see and drive later in the year, from tiny urban commuters to family sedans and crossovers to hard-working big pickups and SUVs. It's also a once-a-year cornucopia of auto executives and leaders from around the world. "There will be some really fun stuff that you'll hear about in the future" - Ford's Kevin Layden So, in-between dozens of cool new-product unveilings on rotating stages during the two press days preceding the public show, we auto scribes grab what planned and impromptu interviews we can. Sessions with top industry leaders can be hard to get, but I was able to score a seat in a group session with then-General Motors North America president (now executive VP of global product development) Mark Reuss, and I also managed brief one-on-ones with a trio of vehicle electrification leaders, one each from Ford, BMW and GM, and what they said then remains relevant now. First up is Kevin Layden, Ford's Director of Electrified Powertrain Engineering. ABG: Where will Ford go beyond its current Focus EV and hybrids, and will there be a Ford EV and/or hybrid on its own energy-optimized platform one day. KL: We don't want to do a dedicated electric vehicle with all the development costs borne by a niche product. At the Michigan Assembly plant right now we're building the Focus electric, PHEV and EcoBoost on the same assembly line. Also the C-Max, with both a hybrid and an Energi plug-in, and we use that same power pack in the Fusion Hybrid and Energi. We want to be, "The power of choice" [a Ford marketing slogan], so having that choice for customers is very important. And if I want to sell the Fusion, Focus and C-Max globally, we can use these power packs wherever it makes sense. So as we go forward, you'll see us proliferating the power packs we have today. Then the question is, what do we do next? There will be some really fun stuff that you'll hear about in the future. ABG: Is the efficiency difference between a dedicated ultra-efficient vehicle platform and a shared multi-use platform getting smaller as all platforms get more efficient? KL: Exactly. Were going through aero studies now on wheels and tires and hood sealers on base vehicles. We have full aerodynamic wind tunnel studies going on with the base Focus and C-Max, so all of that [aerodynamic improvement] will be there for EVs.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.