2008 Ford F-250 Lariat on 2040-cars
Trenton, New Jersey, United States
Engine:Diesel 8 Cylinder Engine
Fuel Type:Diesel
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTSW21R88EC71614
Mileage: 178883
Make: Ford
Trim: Lariat
Drive Type: 4WD
Horsepower Value: 350
Horsepower RPM: 3000
Net Torque Value: 650
Net Torque RPM: 2000
Style ID: 287741
Features: 20" PREMIUM POLISHED FORGED ALUMINUM WHEELS, 6.4L OHV V8 TURBO-DIESEL POWER STROKE ENGINE, CAMEL, LEATHER LUXURY CAPTAIN CHAIRS W/CONSOLE, ELECTRIC SHIFT-ON-THE-FLY TRANSFER CASE, LARIAT SERIES ORDER CODE, NAVIGATION RADIO W/IN-DASH SCREEN & DVD ROM, PWR SLIDING REAR WINDOW, TAILGATE STEP, TORQSHIFT 5-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION W/OD
Power Options: Pwr steering
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Camel
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: F-250
Ford F-250 for Sale
- 2022 ford f-250 king rach 4x4 tremor(US $10,100.00)
- 1997 ford f-250(US $25,000.00)
- 1973 ford f-250(US $17,000.00)
- 2023 ford f-250 xl(US $22,000.00)
- 1996 ford f-250 county maintained rebuilt trans 30k ago(US $9,999.00)
- 2008 ford f-250 super duty(US $15,500.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
Williams Custom Tops-Interiors ★★★★★
Volkswagon of Langhorne ★★★★★
Vip Honda Honda Automobiles ★★★★★
Tri State Auto Glass ★★★★★
Solveri Collision Center ★★★★★
Scotts Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
RTR Spec 5 Concept shows off 2015 Ford Mustang's drifty potential
Wed, 05 Nov 2014Meet the Ford Mustang RTR Spec 5 Concept, a fully functional drift car that, according to our team in Sin City, has been doling out demo drifts in front of the Las Vegas Convention Center.
Destined to be the flagship of RTR's Tactical Performance Line, the Spec 5 Concept is, in addition to its 5.0-liter Aluminator V8 engine, chock full of performance parts that you can buy for your very own 2015 Mustang. In addition to the Ford Racing engine, the OEM parts supplier has lent the Spec 5 an aluminum radiator and a close-ratio six-speed transmission.
ASD Motorsports provided the front lower control arms, while the car itself rides on a fully customized coilover suspension. Magnaflow and American Racing have provided the exhaust system and headers, respectively. 20-inch HRE wheels, designed for RTR, are wrapped in sticky Nitto rubber.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Ford-sponsored survey says a third of Brits have snapped a 'selfie' while driving [w/videos]
Fri, 08 Aug 2014Talking on the phone while driving isn't advisable, and texting while driving is downright dangerous. Considering those truths, the fact that we even need to point this out this is incredibly disturbing: taking "selfies" while behind the wheel is exceptionally stupid. But, it's a thing that a third of 18- to 24-year-old British drivers have copped to doing, according to a new study from Ford.
Ford, through its Driving Skills for Life program, surveyed 7,000 smartphone owners from across Europe, all aged between 18 and 24, and found that young British drivers were more likely to snap a selfie while behind the wheel than their counterparts in Germany, France, Romania, Italy, Spain and Belgium.
According to the study, the average selfie takes 14 seconds, which, while traveling at 60 miles per hour, is long enough to travel over the length of nearly four football fields (the Ford study uses soccer fields, but we translated it to football, because, you know, America). That's an extremely dangerous distance to not be focused on the road.