2003 Ford F-150 Ext Cab Super 4-doors Triton V8 4x4 Flood Salvage Runs & Drives on 2040-cars
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Engine:5.4L TRITON
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Model: F-150
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Trim: XLT
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 220,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Sub Model: XLT
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
2003 FORD F-150 EXTENDED CAB SUPER TRITON V8 ENGINE
RUNS AND DRIVES
DESCRIPTION:
I AM SELLING A 2003 FORD F-15O EXTENDED CAB PICKUP TRUCK. THE TRUCK WAS IN A FLOOD. IT RUNS EXCELENT AND DRIVES. IT HAS 220,000 MILES ON IT. IT HAS CHROME WHEELS, BED LINER, TRAILER HITCH, ALL 4 DOORS OPEN. IT HAS THE 5.4 V8 TRITON ENGINE. IT WOULD MAKE A GREAT TRUCK. FOR WORK OR PLAY
This vehicle is being sold as is, where is with no warranty, expressed written or implied. The seller shall not be responsible for the correct description, authenticity, genuineness, or defects herein, and makes no warranty in connection therewith. No allowance or set aside will be made on account of any incorrectness, imperfection, defect or damage. Any descriptions or representations are for identification purposes only and are not to be construed as a warranty of any type. It is the responsibility of the buyer to have thoroughly inspected the vehicle, and to have satisfied himself or herself as to the condition and value and to bid based upon that judgment solely. The seller shall and will make every reasonable effort to disclose any known defects associated with this vehicle at the buyer's request prior to the close of sale. Seller assumes no responsibility for any repairs regardless of any oral statements about the vehicle.
Buyer responsible for own shipping. We can help with shipping.
Fee and Tax Information:
NY state resident buyers are subject to additional local state and county tax rate and must be collected by us the seller. Out of state buyers pay use tax to there state tax collector. Deposits are non refundable. Over 30 years in business in NY Call me Joe 716-693-1110 for more information.
Vehicle carries a NY Salvage, Repairable, 907A Certificate. In Most states including NY, it will need a Salvage examination before being issued a Title. Please research this paper work type and all rules that apply to it in your home state.
Non Refundable $1000 PayPal deposit due with in 24 hours of auction end, remaining balance is due within 7 days via cash, certified Bank check or Bank wire. Please do not bid or buy this car if you are not planning to pay for it, this is simply unfair to serious buyers. NY State Buyers must pay 8% sales tax. WINNING BIDDER PLEASE CALL ASAP AFTER THE AUCTION (716) 713-7855.
Ford F-150 for Sale
- Lightning 5.4l cd supercharged automatic alloys tow red cold ac financing power
- 1989 ford f-150 no rust 4x4(US $2,500.00)
- 2012 white lariat 4x4 ecoboost, fully loaded !!!!
- 2012 ford f-150 harley-davidson 4x4 sunroof nav 18k mi texas direct auto(US $46,980.00)
- 5.0l 4x4 long bed cd player cold ac towing hitch bed liner 85k mi no reserve
- 1994 ford f-150 xl extended cab pickup 2-door 4.9l
Auto Services in New York
Websmart II ★★★★★
Wappingers Auto Tech ★★★★★
Wahl To Wahl Auto ★★★★★
Vic & Al`s Turnpike Auto Inc ★★★★★
USA Cash For Cars Inc ★★★★★
Tru Dimension Machining Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.
Defying Trump, major automakers finalize California emissions deal
Tue, Aug 18 2020WASHINGTON — The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and major automakers on Monday confirmed they had finalized binding agreements to cut vehicle emissions in the state, defying the Trump administration's push for weaker curbs on tailpipe pollution. The agreements with carmakers Ford Motor Co, Volkswagen AG, Honda Motor Co and BMW AG were first announced in July 2019 as voluntary measures prompting anger from U.S. President Donald Trump. A month later, the Justice Department opened an antitrust probe into the agreements. The government ended the investigation without action. The Trump administration in March finalized a rollback of U.S. vehicle emissions standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026. That is far weaker than the 5% annual increases in the discarded rules adopted under President Barack Obama. The 50-page California agreements, which extend through 2026, are less onerous than the standards finalized by the Obama administration but tougher than the Trump administration standards. The automakers have also agreed to electric vehicle commitments. Volvo Cars, owned by China's Geely Holdings, said in March it planned to join the automakers agreeing to the California requirements. It has also finalized its agreement. The settlement agreements say California and automakers agreed to resolve "potential legal disputes concerning the authority of CARB" and other states that have adopted California's standards. In May, a group of 23 U.S. states led by California and some major cities, challenged the Trump vehicle emissions rule. Other major automakers like General Motors Co, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and Toyota Motor Corp did not join the California agreement. Those companies also sided with the Trump administration in a separate lawsuit over whether the federal government can strip California of the right to set zero emission vehicle requirements. Ford said the "final agreement will reduce emissions in our vehicles at a more stringent rate, support and incentivize the production of electrified products, and create regulatory certainty." BMW said "by setting these long-term, predictable, and achievable standards, we have the regulatory certainty that is necessary for long-term planning that will not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but ultimately benefit consumers as well."Â
2018 Ford Expedition vs other big SUVs: How it compares on paper
Fri, Nov 10 2017With our Alex Kierstein rightly impressed in his first-drive review of the new 2018 Ford Expedition, we decided to dig a little deeper into the numbers, and we came up with the spreadsheet below to highlight how the new 2018 Expedition compares on paper to its main full-size SUV competitors: the 2018 Chevy Tahoe and Suburban (and therefore the 2018 GMC Yukon), 2018 Toyota Sequoia and 2018 Nissan Armada. We also threw in the new, even bigger 2018 Chevrolet Traverse since, as you'll see, its massive dimensions should put it on the radar for anyone who needs loads of passenger and cargo space but doesn't care as much about towing. A few notes about the chart above. First, the 6.2-liter V8 that's included with the new-for-2018 Tahoe RST trim level is the standard engine on the GMC Yukon Denali. You can apply most of the Tahoe's numbers to the entire Yukon and Yukon XL lineup. Second, though we highlighted categories where the Traverse led, we also highlighted the runner-up full-size SUV, since this was ultimately about that segment. Traverse numbers are broadly applicable to the new Buick Enclave. Related Video: Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan Toyota SUV Comparison consumer ford expedition gmc yukon chevy traverse toyota sequoia nissan armada chevrolet tahoe ford expedition max