Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Ford F-150 Xlt Super Crew White Great Condition! Only 89,000 Miles! Look! on 2040-cars

US $11,500.00
Year:2001 Mileage:89000 Color: with gray interior
Location:

Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania, United States

Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania, United States
Advertising:

 Ford F-150 XLT Super Crew, V8,4.6L, white exterior color with gray interior, new Michelin tires, new battery, tonneau cover, bed liner w/ rubber mat, CD player, hitch, bug deflector, window shields, only 89,000 miles! I owned this truck since it had 20,000 miles. I've had service done every 3-5 thousand miles and have all of the paper work. This truck has been very well maintained. The Michelin tires are only a little over a year old and are rated at 80,000 miles. There was a new battery installed 8-28-14. There are no rips, tears or stains in the interior. Seats are like brand new because of seat covers used. I am a non smoker, so there is no smell. I am also throwing in an aluminum bed extender. There is some minor rust on the rocker panels (which is typical for Fords) There is also minor rust at the end of the truck bed. I only mention these few flaws to be honest and upfront about the vehicle. Trust me, you will not be disappointed. This truck is in overall great condition and has A LOT of life left in it!

LOCAL PICK UP ONLY - NO DELIVERY
CHECK OUT MY PERFECT FEEDBACK AND BUY WITH CONFIDENCE!

Auto Services in Pennsylvania

Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 111 S Bolmar St, Westtown
Phone: (610) 431-2053

Van Gorden`s Tire & Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 820 RR 9, Stroudsburg
Phone: (570) 664-7917

Valley Seat Cover Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 200 Freeport St, Natrona-Hts
Phone: (724) 335-5161

Tony`s Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 109 Green Ln, Lansdowne
Phone: (215) 482-9653

Tire Ranch Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Towing
Address: 165 Leiby Rd, Orangeville
Phone: (570) 672-2559

Thomas Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 9974 Molly Pitcher Hwy, Willow-Hill
Phone: (717) 532-5228

Auto blog

Ford hybrid sales rebound following MPG controversy

Sun, 31 Aug 2014

Ford hybrid customers apparently have very short memories. With two EPA fuel economy reratings in the last year, sales of the C-Max, Fusion Hybrid and Lincoln MKZ haven't been too terribly dented, Ward's Auto reports.
All three vehicles saw sales dips following the August 2013 rerating, although sales of the MKZ Hybrid had begun to rebound as early as November of that year. C-Max sales, meanwhile, took slightly longer, with sales on a steadily improving course as early as February of this year.
The second rerating, in June of this year, has had an even smaller effect on the Blue Oval's hybrids. The C-Max has actually been subject to a sales increase, while both the MKZ and Fusion saw minor sales drops (less than 400 units between the two in the month following the rerating).

Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT

Tue, Feb 21 2023

When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.