Ford F-100 Custom Cab Shortbox on 2040-cars
Springdale, Washington, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:352
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1966
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Trim: Custom Cab
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: 2WD
Mileage: 87,760
Exterior Color: White/Red
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Black, Red, White
|
1966 Ford F-100 Short Box with a V8 352 with overdrive. 2WD.
It runs and but the drive line need to be cut in order for it to drive. I haven't had the time or the money to do it. I had pulled the gas tank too and painted it so it just needs to be put back behind the seat. I didn't get a chance to bolt the front clip on properly before I had to move it so the passenger door currently won't open. The seat needs to be reupholstered as well. Whoever owned it before me fixed the floor pans so there is no through rust. The worst part of rust is on the rear bumper were it has some through rust. The body is really straight and would be a good candidate for a restore if you wanted to go that far with it. It has a Warner T-85N transmission which is the 3 on the tree 3 speed with the overdrive transmission. 352 V-8 for an engine. The odometer reads 87760 which I don't think the odometer has rolled past 100000 miles yet because before we put the 352 in the short box the engine ran superb and had no issues. (It was in a 66 long box I had and when I got the short box it had a 351 Cleveland in it, we pulled the 351 Cleveland out) I was planning to restore this truck but don't have the time to do it anymore. The frame is partly painted and the inside of the front clip is painted. There are very few dents, all of which I took pictures of. I can't post them all so email me if you want pictures of all of the ones I could find on it. It's a great little truck and I hate to get rid of it. The windshield needs to be replaced as it has a crack in it. It wouldn't cost much to get it up and running, it'll just take a little bit of time and it'll run like a champ again. It's definitely got a lot of power and it's a blast to drive. If you have any questions feel free to shoot me an email. short box, short bed, shortbed, |
Ford F-100 for Sale
1955 ford f-100 project truck, hot rod, rat rod(US $3,500.00)
1955 ford f-100 hot rod custom pick up truck - santa claus red(US $18,000.00)
1966 ford f100 truck
1955 ford f100, nice truck(US $13,000.00)
1965 ford short wheel base, custom cab, twin i beam, sharp
1969 f100 ford truck, rock solid, all done, cold ac, carolina blue, 8' bed(US $14,900.00)
Auto Services in Washington
Wrench-N-Time Quality Auto ★★★★★
Wesco Autobody Supply Inc ★★★★★
Tiny`s Tire Factory ★★★★★
Taylors Mobile RV & Auto Service ★★★★★
Tayag`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Specialty Motors ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Review
Thu, Feb 26 2015"It's just a V6 Mustang." That phrase, so often spoken with derision and disdain, has haunted owners of Ford's more affordable and economical pony car since roughly April of 1964. Even after Dearborn finally paid some attention to its entry-level muscle car by eliminating telltale V6 features – the company fit dual exhausts in place of the single-exit pipe in 2011, negating the budget offering's biggest visual giveaway – the car was still hard pressed to shake its reputation as a hairdresser's car and rental fleet queen. For the Mustang's 50th year in service, Ford went back to the drawing board, we think with the distinct goal of eliminating the stigma of the non-V8 Mustang. While the V6 is still being offered (your local Avis and Enterprise lots wouldn't be the same without them), it's best to think of the new, four-cylinder, turbocharged Mustang EcoBoost as the entry-level model. But will the addition of forced induction – from an engine that will see action in the upcoming, enthusiast-centric Focus RS, no less – be enough to appease those pony car fans that believe that only Mustangs with eight cylinders are worthy of the galloping stallion badge? After a week at the helm, we certainly think it is. The new Mustang's looks have been covered ad nauseam. Chances are good that you either love the fastback styling, or you think the original pony car now looks a lot like a Fusion Coupe. We'll ignore the bigger styling remarks for the 2015 Mustang, and instead, focus on what's done right with the EcoBoost model. Like the V6 before it, certain boxes are correctly ticked. Dual exhausts? Check. 18-inch alloys? Check. (Our EcoBoost Premium model even shares its wheels with the base GT). HID headlamps? Check. Up front, there's a surprisingly meaty chin spoiler while the muscular lines of the 'Stang's long hood tie in nicely with the fastback shape, which terminates in a neat rear spoiler. There's even a body-colored diffuser at the back, between the chromed exhaust tips. The bottom line is, unless you're a true Mustang aficionado, you'll be hard pressed to tell the difference between the turbocharged car and its 435-horsepower brother. Simply sitting in the redesigned cabin isn't enough to give the EcoBoost away, either. The leather-trimmed seats (standard on the Premium trim) are cozy and supportive, with plenty of bolstering to help keep both driver and passenger in place while the 'Stang exhibits its newly enhanced cornering abilities.
2020 Toyota Highlander vs other 3-row crossovers: There can only be one!
Fri, Dec 20 2019We've done quite a few spec comparison posts involving three-row family crossovers, and when included, the Toyota Highlander has always been the runt of the group. While the rest increasingly seemed to be benchmarking each other toward greater girth, the Highlander was the outlier. That changes a bit for the 2020 Toyota Highlander, but only a bit. It's now larger and more competitive, specifically in regards to the amount of cargo space aft of the third-row seat. As you can see below, this aligns the Highlander most closely to its long-time competitor the 2020 Honda Pilot. However, let's see how it stacks up to others in the segment, which is heavily populated now, so for the sake of space, we've selected the newest entries: Kia Telluride, Hyundai Palisade, Subaru Ascent and Ford Explorer. The order in which they are presented is random. Performance and fuel economy The 2020 Highlander is more than 200 pounds lighter than its predecessor, but has the same 295-horsepower V6 engine that was already one of the strongest in the segment. We'd say that would give it a leg up, but the Pilot and Explorer have proven to be sprinters, delivering 0-60 times in the low-6 range by some publications' stopwatches (or VBoxes, whatever). We don't expect the Highlander to beat them, but it may dip into the 6's. The heavy, less-powerful Subaru Ascent is most likely to take up the rear. It's fuel economy of 23 mpg combined also matches the Highlander and Explorer for segment-best. Remember, however, that the Explorer's turbocharged inline-four engine is likely more susceptible to differences in driving style (read: a heavy foot). Of course, if you're really interested in fuel economy, the Highlander and Explorer are the only vehicles in the segment to offer hybrid versions. The Ford Explorer Hybrid puts a greater emphasis on performance, however, resulting in lower estimates of 25 mpg combined (AWD) and 28 mpg combined (FWD). By contrast, the new 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid is estimated to return 36 mpg combined. Passenger and cargo space According to Highlander chief engineer Yoshikazu Saeki, he had a choice of two directions with the new Highlander. He could have indeed made it bigger, matching these very competitors, especially in terms of third-row and cargo space. Or, he could have maintained a smaller-than-average size. He obviously chose the latter. First, it was the size customers had come to expect. Would they be put off by something bigger?
Ford forced to recall Escape over fire risk yet again
Tue, 26 Nov 2013Recalls happen. Automakers hope they won't, but they do. And that's alright, for the most part, because cars are designed (and to a large degree still made) by humans, and humans make mistakes. So we forgive them, as long as the problem is resolved. Only in the case of the Ford Escape, the problem seems to keep coming back.
That's why Ford is calling in the Escape yet again due to fire concerns. The issue revolves around problematic fuel lines in 9,469 units manufactured between October 5, 2011, and July 11, 2012, all of which use the 1.6-liter EcoBoost inline four-cylinder engine.
As you yourself may recall, the Escape was subject to a string of recalls last year that resulted in a $17 million fine. One of them was over this very same issue, which Ford apparently didn't rectify the first time around. Let's hope this time is the last time.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.054 s, 7955 u























