Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1972 Ford F100 4 X 4 Shortwide on 2040-cars

US $3,500.00
Year:1972 Mileage:0 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Redding, California, United States

Redding, California, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:390
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1gcdt14w5r8157521 Year: 1972
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: F-100
Trim: custom
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: 4 wheel drive
Mileage: 0
Exterior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1972 FORD F100 4 wheel drive in really good shape for the year. Runs great, tires good, power brakes, no radio, seat cover in good shape. Seat good under cover. 4 speed manual transmission shifts good-no problems. Clutch is good. Brakes are touchy-very strong. This short wide has no rust but needs restoration to bring it to its full potential. Previous owner used bed liner on floor of cab to keep it from rust. Book values this truck at 9000 LOW! Drivers rear quarter has been bumped but with panel replacement wouldn't even know it was ever bumped. Interior is ok-both windows work fine and door panels are in good shape but the radio slot was butchered somewhere along the line for a custom radio. Windshield is cracked but not in front of drivers line of sight. Nice old truck. Buyer is responsible for shipping but I will help any way I can. I am looking for older 30's or mid 50's chevy/ford truck also looking for Harley-older/FLSTC evo or ?. Seller retains right to end listing as it is for sale locally also. Please call 918-635-5358 for any questions. Thanx and happy bidding!

Auto Services in California

Yuba City Toyota Lincoln-Mercury ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Car Rental
Address: 1340 Bridge Street, Browns-Valley
Phone: (866) 595-6470

World Auto Body Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 140 N Coast Highway 101, Carlsbad
Phone: (760) 753-0035

Wilson Way Glass ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Door Repair
Address: 2965 N Wilson Way, Salida
Phone: (209) 943-0325

Willie`s Tires & Alignment ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 705 Monterey Pass Rd # B, San-Gabriel
Phone: (323) 604-0905

Wholesale Import Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Accessories
Address: 10562 Walker St, Hawaiian-Gardens
Phone: (714) 827-6735

Wheel Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 521 S B St, Montara
Phone: (650) 525-4517

Auto blog

Ford to pay $17.35 million over Escape recall

Thu, 01 Aug 2013

Ford had a bit of a recall spree around this time last year, with a pair of issues on the then-new 2013 Escape, followed by a recall of 423,000 2001 to 2004 Escapes because they might accelerate of their own accord. Accordingly, Uncle Sam pasted Ford with a $17.35 million fine because it took too long to inform customers, according to a report from Automotive News.
Ford agreed to settle with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, accepting the fine but not admitting fault. The recall, which afflicted Escapes with the 3.0-liter V-6 along with 217,000 Mazda Tributes from 2001 to 2006 and 2008, was due to faulty gas pedals that could stay down after a driver removed their foot.
Ford issued a statement regarding the fine, saying, "We take the safety of our customers seriously and continuously evaluate our processes for improvements. While we are confident in our current processes for quickly identifying and addressing potential vehicle issues, Ford agreed to this settlement to avoid a lengthy dispute with the government."

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Bronco, Yukon, Hummer and a CES recap | Autoblog Podcast #610

Fri, Jan 17 2020

In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski and Assistant Editor Zac Palmer. They kick things off by talking about recent news, including the revival of the Hummer name as an electric pickup, revealing Ford Bronco spy shots and the unveiling of the 2021 GMC Yukon. Then Zac tells about his time in Las Vegas attending CES 2020. They talk about the cars they've been driving: a JCW-tuned Mini Clubman, the long-term Subaru Forester with its new gold wheels, a Volvo S60 PHEV that's been added to the long-term fleet, and a Camry Hybrid. Last, but not least, they help a listener decide how to spend his money on a sports car. Autoblog Podcast #610 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Hummer returning as an electric GMC pickup The latest on the Ford Bronco 2021 GMC Yukon CES 2020 recap Cars we're driving:2020 John Cooper Works Mini Clubman 2020 Subaru Forester long-termer (now with gold wheels!) 2020 Volvo S60 T8 Inscription 2019 Toyota Camry Hybrid XLE Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.