Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Ford F100 Ranger on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:50000
Location:

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

This is a 1969 Ford Ranger F100.

Many new parts installed: 
New front fenders
California doors
New windshield
Perfect original dashpad installed
After market tilt steering
Power disc breaks
Power steering
New King Pins front shocks
Everything with the breaks have been replaced new
New radiator
Rebuilt 302 late model
Roller camshaft
Edelbrock carb
After market electronic ignition
New internal regulated alternator. 

Have other new parts that go with it: 
Weather stripping, two new front wheel moldings, extra radiator support original California part, all the trim for the sides, and the interior door panels (dinged up but usable). 

Has about 1000 miles on the new engine and transmission.

Truck runs and drives well. Needs front end alignment. Some bodywork and paint. Too much more to list, any other questions don't hesitate to contact me.  Buyer responsible for pick-up, $500 deposit required by winning bidder at end of auction. Thanks for looking!!

Auto Services in Michigan

Wilson`s Davison Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 914 N State Rd, Ortonville
Phone: (810) 653-6996

Wade`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8330 Gratiot Ave, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 922-2877

Village Ford Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 2728 Beech Daly Rd, Taylor
Phone: (313) 563-5698

Village Ford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 23535 Michigan Ave, Taylor
Phone: (313) 769-2710

U P Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 11798 US Highway 2, Garden
Phone: (906) 644-2540

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 530 E Maple Rd, Harrison-Township
Phone: (248) 585-2770

Auto blog

Ford recalls 9,900 vehicles across two campaigns

Tue, Dec 29 2015

Ford is recalling a total of 9,885 vehicles in two campaigns. The Basics: In one recall, Ford will recall 9,017 examples of the 2013 Escape with build dates from January 11, 2012, to April 1, 2013, and the 2013-2014 Focus ST produced between May 3, 2012, and October 14, 2013. The Problem: Splices in the engine wiring harness might not have enough compression, and this can cause the manifold absolute pressure sensor to send incorrect signals to the powertrain control module. This issue could cause the engine to stall. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The Fix: Dealers will replace the current crimped splices with new splices, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. If You Own One: The repair campaign will begin on January 4, 2016. More Information: Ford recalled the 2013 Escape and Focus ST in August 2014 for the same problem, and this is an expansion of that campaign, according to company spokesperson John Cangany to Autoblog. The Basics: In the smaller of the two campaigns, Ford will recall 868 examples of the 2013 Explorer, Explorer Police Utility, Taurus, Taurus Police Interceptor, Flex, Lincoln MKS, and MKT. The Problem: The fuel delivery module can crack, which would cause a fuel leak. Injuries/Deaths: None reported. The Fix: Dealers will replace the fuel delivery module. If You Own One: Owners should receive notice soon because NHTSA's report says the recall begins in December. More Information: According to Cangany, this recall is an expansion of a campaign from 2013 for these vehicles. RECALL Subject : Engine Wiring Splices may cause Stall Report Receipt Date: DEC 02, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V813000 Component(s): ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Potential Number of Units Affected: 9,017 All Products Associated with this Recall Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD ESCAPE 2013 FORD FOCUS 2013-2014 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2013 Escape vehicles manufactured January 11, 2012, to April 1, 2013, and 2013-2014 Focus ST vehicles manufactured May 03, 2012, to October 14, 2013. Insufficient compression in the engine wiring harness splices to the Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensor may provide incorrect signals to the powertrain control module (PCM). CONSEQUENCE: The incorrect signals could cause the vehicle to hesitate or the engine to stall, increasing the risk of a crash.

Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015

Tue, Feb 11 2014

Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper. For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011. The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors. While the adoption of SAE J2807 will be helpful for light-duty customers, those interested in bigger trucks will still be left with differing standards. There is no sign of the new tow standards being adopted for the heavy-duty market.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.