1966 Ford F100 (f-100) Short Bed 2wd - Rat Rod - Project on 2040-cars
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
Engine:N/A
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Exterior Color: Primer
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Red
Model: F-100
Number of Cylinders: NA
Trim: Pick-up Truck
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 72,000
Sub Model: Custom Cab
1966 Ford F100 - Rolling Chassis
Short Bed
2wd
BARN FIND
This is a very hard to find 1966 Ford F100 Pick-up Truck. It is a rolling chassis only NO MOTOR, NO TRANSMISSION. This truck does roll and the steering seems to work, brakes are not in working order. This truck will need restoration it is a Custom Cab with a very nice interior, dash pad will need replaced, however door panels are in good shape. All glass in the truck is in very good condition, the cab will need floor pan repair, I do have some of the chrome trim for the truck including front and rear bumpers (need rechromed or painted), grill is in very nice shape, do have headlight bezels, taillights however lenses will need to be repaired or replaced as their center jewels are loose. The cab over all is in pretty decent shape besides the floor pans, the doors are in good shape however they will need some patching. The bed sides are in good shape, one side will need some sheet metal patching though. The front clip is there but again will need some metal work to be one hundred percent. The biggest issue on this truck is the bed, the header panel will need to be replaced, truck does not come with a tailgate, bed of truck will need repair (metalwork). However this is a very desirable model as it is the short bed, 2wd. In addition it does come with a Free and Clear Maryland State Title reflecting 72000 original miles. This would make an excellent Father/Son project. Once restored this truck will be very collectable as well.
Please feel free to call John at Don John's Performance should you have any questions prior to bidding.
240-382-9015
Truck can be seen by appointment.
Truck is sold as is where is.
This truck will need to be towed from its current location.
Buyer assumes all cost for transporting the vehicle.
Ford F-100 for Sale
- 1967 ford f-100 pickup base 3.9l(US $9,500.00)
- 1951ford f-100 rat rod pickup truck. 350ci, auto, ps, pdb, stereo, patina!(US $13,995.00)
- 1966 ford f100 rat rod pickup 66(US $5,000.00)
- 1965 ford f100 camper special custom cab barn find(US $9,500.00)
- 1953 ford truck, v8 3 speed(US $1,200.00)
- 1967 ford f-100 pickup base 4.9l
Auto Services in Maryland
Wes Greenway`s Waldorf VW ★★★★★
Virginia Tire & Auto of Ashburn/Dulles ★★★★★
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Streavig`s Service Center ★★★★★
Southern Stables Automotive ★★★★★
Sedlak Automotive, LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports no longer recommends Honda Civic
Mon, Oct 24 2016Consumer Reports annual Car Reliability Survey is out, and yes, there are some big surprises. First and foremost? The venerable publication no longer recommends the Honda Civic. In fact, aside from the walking-dead CR-Z and limited-release Clarity fuel-cell car, the Civic is the only Honda to miss out on CR's prestigious nod. At the opposite end there's a surprise as well – Toyota and Lexus remain the most reliable brands on the market, but Buick cracked the top three. That's up from seventh last year, and the first time for an American brand to stand on the Consumer Reports podium. Mazda's entire lineup earned Recommended checks as well. Consumer Reports dinged the Civic for its "infuriating" touch-screen radio, lack of driver lumbar adjustability, the limited selection of cars on dealer lots fitted with Honda's popular Sensing system, and the company's decision to offer LaneWatch instead of a full-tilt blind-spot monitoring system. Its score? A lowly 58. The Civic isn't the only surprise drop from CR's Recommended ranks. The Audi A3, Ford F-150, Subaru WRX/STI, and Volkswagen Jetta, GTI, and Passat all lost the Consumer Reports' checkmark. On the flipside, a number of popular vehicles graduated to the Recommended ranks, including the BMW X5, Chevrolet Camaro, Corvette, and Cruze, Hyundai Santa Fe, Porsche Macan, and Tesla Model S. Perhaps the biggest surprise is the hilariously recall-prone Ford Escape getting a Recommended check – considering the popularity of Ford's small crossover, this is likely a coup for the brand, as it puts the Escape on a level playing field with the Recommended Toyota RAV4, Honda CR-V, and Nissan Rogue. While Ford is probably happy to see CR promote the Escape, the list wasn't as kind for every brand. For example, of the entire Fiat Chrysler Automobiles catalog, the ancient Chrysler 300 was the only car to score a check – there wasn't a single Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati, or Ram on the list. That hurts. FCA isn't alone at the low end, either. GMC, Jaguar Land Rover, Mini, and Mitsubishi don't have a vehicle on CR's list between them, while brands like Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Nissan, Lincoln, Infiniti, and Cadillac only have a few models each. You can check out Consumer Reports entire reliability roundup, even without a subscription, here.
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd
Former Ford CEO Mulally won't run for president
Mon, 15 Sep 2014Alan Mulally will not be following his successful term as president and CEO of Ford Motor Company with a run at an even bigger presidency. Rumors that the 68-year-old former Boeing exec would make a run at the White House sprouted after his apparent dodging of a reporter's questions about a potential candidacy during a forum in Indianapolis.
"I really think it's important that we all pull together. We really need to pull together around a compelling vision for our country and a comprehensive strategy to do it and work together. We really need to do it," Mulally said at the conference, according to The Detroit News.
He's since clarified by saying, "[I'm] honored at the suggestion, but that is not a role I am considering."