Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1953 Ford F100 on 2040-cars

Year:1953 Mileage:999999
Location:

Seattle, Washington, United States

Seattle, Washington, United States
Advertising:

SERIOUS BIDDER ONLY!!


New bidders with zero or less than 5 feedback rating should email me

Bidder with negative feedbacks, please contact me first! 
ANY QUESTIONS, Please call (206)-3 five 3-Seven five 5 5


1953  Ford F-100  1/2 ton  "NO RUST" 

This is not $20,000.00 show truck, but it is a good clean start

-SUPER SOLID body!!
-BODY is very very SOLID!! pretty much all straight but NOT PERFECT! couple of dings here and there, mostly on the hood. 
-As you can see, it needs a real paint job but it was build to be everyday driver! VERY solid drive train. 
-Bed floor needs new wood but and bed sides and gate are SUPER SOLID! 
-Engine and Transmission in good working order, its runs and drives great!
-Stock brakes and steering. 
-ALL LIGHTS work on it. NO HORN or dome light.
-Heater does not work. 
-215/65/15 front and 235/75/15 rear, all are almost new with plenty of tread life left.

Has Chevy 350/350 drive train. Stock rear. All brake are fresh, shoes, wheel cylinders and hoses. All NEW wiring , New 12 volt wiper motor, NEW gauges, New Tires, New Lokar shifter. Has all the glass, door windows roll up and down like new. 
A lot of new engine parts!!

I drove this truck around and it felt great!! NICE SOLID BODY and I felt confident to drive this truck anywhere!
GOOD CLEAN TITLE!!


Vehicle is being sold "as is" condition..NO GUARANTY OR WARRANTY! I can only tell you that I would not hesitate to drive it anywhere!!



I can ship this truck to Los Angeles, CA for around 650.00 

I will also sell this truck to worldwide bidder.

PayPal payment accepted, buyer must pay service fee. 


Terms of Sale

Payment Method:

Cash (in person), certified check, bank transfers. All funds must be in US dollars only. I will also accept PayPal however buyer must pay all fees. Please be sure to have full payment and/or approved financing in place before making your final bid. 

Deposit

Buyer must contact me within 24 hours of accepted offer, and make arrangements for payment at that time. A $500.00 deposit is due within 48 hours of listing’s end to secure the vehicle.

Payment of Balance Due

The remainder is due (plus applicable fees and taxes) within 5 days. If no contact is made within 24 hours I reserve the right to re-list the vehicle or sell it otherwise. All financial transactions must be completed before delivery of the vehicle.

Shipping

The buyer is responsible for all shipping charges.  I can assist buyer with finding a shipping company. I assume no responsibility for damages incurred after leaving my premises. If the vehicle is going to be shipped, full payment must be received before the vehicle is delivered to the shipping company. 

Auto Services in Washington

Werner`s Crash Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 710 Taylor Ave N, Kingston
Phone: (206) 285-0780

Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5018 N 46th St, Burton
Phone: (253) 759-3451

Washington Auto Credit ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1905 Cooper Point Rd SW, Anderson-Island
Phone: (360) 412-4120

Universal Auto Body & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1209 E Fir St, Seahurst
Phone: (206) 329-7198

Tri-Cities Battery-Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 2104 N 4th Ave, Pasco
Phone: (509) 545-1473

The Audio Experts with Discount Car Stereo ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems
Address: 23446 Pacific Hwy S, Des-Moines
Phone: (206) 824-5875

Auto blog

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.

From Expedition to Navigator: our predictions for Lincoln's SUV

Tue, Feb 7 2017

In the midst of all the buzz surrounding the new aluminum Ford Expedition and Expedition Max, we remembered the other large SUV the Ford Motor Company showed last year, the Lincoln Navigator concept. And since the Navigator has historically been built on the Expedition platform, we figured there's no better time to focus some of our predictions for the big Lincoln. First off, let's take a look at design. Having seen the new Expedition, we're fairly confident that the Navigator will look almost exactly like its concept. The strong similarities between two mean the Expedition serves as a preview of what a production Navigator will look like. For example, both vehicles' greenhouses we can see that the shape of the C-pillars are nearly identical. The only difference is that the Expedition's are painted body color, while the Navigator's are painted black. Additionally, the character line running along the top of the doors on both vehicles is roughly the same height. The same goes for the more subtle crease near the bottom of the doors. We also see no reason why Lincoln wouldn't use the full width taillights, fender vent, and grille treatment it used on the concept. Those are all easy design changes to create differentiation, and they're all right inline with the cues set by the Continental. View 15 Photos For powertrain, we're pretty certain the 400-horsepower 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 previewed on the concept is a certainty now. The Expedition and Expedition Max will be offered with a 3.5-liter EcoBoost as well, so we know it will fit. We expect the Expedition's engine will produce 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque as it does in the F-150. That's less power than the Navigator concept, but it would be reasonable to make the production Navigator a bit more powerful than its lowly Ford brethren to help justify the increased price tag. Towing capacity will probably be about the same between the Ford and Lincoln, which should be something over 9,000 pounds. The Navigator will probably use the same two-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive drivetrains, too. Inside is where the Expedition and Navigator will likely differ the most, particularly in seating. The Expedition offers seating for up to eight with an available second-row bench seat, and the Navigator concept had captain's chairs for every row. We're expecting the Navigator will only offer second-row captain's chairs since the cramped third row would be a waste of nice buckets.

Lincoln Continental to end after one-and-done generation?

Thu, Mar 15 2018

After only 18 months on sale, the vultures of rumor have begun circling above the Lincoln Continental. Ford Authority says "sources intricately familiar with Ford Motor Company's future product plans" for the domestic luxury brand say the Continental won't get another chance at life after this generation. Those sources didn't detail Ford's reasons for dispatching the executioner on another sad task, but if this is true, even the reasons we can only guess make enough sense to justify the move. The Continental launched into a crossover mania still mushrooming in strength like some Marvel villain, the equivalent of a new dinosaur hatching a few months before the Chicxulub Impact Event. In 18 months, the Continental sold 18,846 units, 12,012 of those sales happening in 2017. In the U.S. this year, sales amounted to 1,573 units through February, about 25 percent down on the annualized monthly rate. It could be worse: The Lexus GS has found 1,009 U.S. buyers so far this year, the Acura RLX, 285. Conversely, the Cadillac XTS — yes, a fleet darling — secured 3,163 sales in the same period. And the German kingpins live in another dimension, with BMW scooting 5,641 5 Series models off dealer lots, and the Mercedes E-Class boasting 8,411 sales of all three variants. Even the much more expensive and much more profitable Lincoln Navigator rang up 2,351 sales in the first 60 days of 2018. That's disheartening reading, especially after Ford reportedly spent more than $1 billion to bring the Continental to market. Sedan segment woes look to have killed the Continental's platform siblings, too, making the Lincoln's demise simply part of the cull. The CD4 architecture also underpins the Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ. Ford canceled the Fusion redesign and won't commit to making either vehicle after 2020. Lincoln's passenger car sales declined more than 30 percent last month; meanwhile, Lincoln needs to spend its money on the crossovers that are selling, and investment in the coming three-row Aviator that will replace the MKT. Ford has a CD6 platform in development that suits front-, rear-, and all-wheel-drive vehicles. Under previous CEO Mark Fields, a new Fusion, Mustang, and MKZ would ride on the CD6, as well as the new Explorer and a Lincoln brother. Those plans left with the previous administration, and company sources told both Ford Authority and The Truth About Cars not to expect a Continental revival on that architecture. Related Video: