Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1991 Ford Explorer 2 Door 4x4 Eddie Bauer on 2040-cars

US $200.00
Year:1991 Mileage:130000 Color: Red /
 Tan
Location:

Grand Marais, Minnesota, United States

Grand Marais, Minnesota, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:4.0L 245Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Sport Utility
For Sale By:Private Seller
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1FMCU24X0MUB26650 Year: 1991
Mileage: 130,000
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: Red
Model: Explorer
Interior Color: Tan
Trim: XL Sport Utility 2-Door
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: Sunroof
Number of Cylinders: 6
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Minnesota

St. Anthony Mobil ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 2801 Kenzie Ter, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 789-5148

Rongo`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3548 Nicollet Ave, Saint-Louis-Park
Phone: (612) 823-7939

Prior Lake Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 16783 Toronto Ave SE, Prior-Lake
Phone: (952) 679-8734

Precision Auto Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 8579 Jefferson Hwy, Wayzata
Phone: (612) 360-2044

Precision Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 11110 61st St NE, Otsego
Phone: (763) 497-1677

Plymouth Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 10905 Old County Road 15, Medicine-Lake
Phone: (763) 250-1408

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

2015 Ford Mustang already under recall, but just 53 units

Sun, 19 Oct 2014

Ford has issued a small - but significant - recall for one of its spotlight cars: the 2015 Mustang.
The recall affects just 53 cars, with 50 in the United States and three in Canada. Ford said the passenger side safety belt buckle tension sensor may not have been calibrated properly by the supplier. This could lead to "misclassification" of the passenger seat occupant, and could cause the airbag to deploy improperly.
A Ford spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, the automaker said it is not aware of any accidents or injuries, and dealers will replace the buckle assembly at no cost to customers. The cars affected were built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant in Michigan from Aug. 18 to Oct. 2.

2015 Ford Mustang GT [w/video]

Fri, 19 Sep 2014

At 50 years old, the object of fantasies, a tuner's dream, a movie star and more than nine million strong, it couldn't be truer to say that the Ford Mustang needs no introduction. This newest Mustang, however - making the biggest changes we've seen to the pony car since perhaps 1964.5 - is something Ford has been introducing all year.
We went on a Deep Dive, covered the way it looks when it was revealed, detailed the engine specs, got a ride in the EcoBoost and listened to the V8, got rolling footage and watched it do a standard-feature burnout.
The only thing left to do? Drive it. Having now done so for a few hours around Los Angeles, what we can tell you is to forget everything you know about the Mustang. This new car shames the old, redefines the model and gallops far ahead of anything else in the segment.