2015 Ford Explorer Xlt on 2040-cars
11400 New Halls Ferry Road, Florissant, Missouri, United States

Engine:3.5L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FM5K8D89FGA03067
Stock Num: FA03067
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer XLT
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Bronze Fire
Interior Color: Charcoal
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 3
If you don't see the new Ford you want, we'll find if for you in 48hrs at no extra charge. Pricing includes All Ford rebates, College Grad rebate, Military Appreciation Rebate and may require financing through FMCC. Contact us for more details. Paul Cerame Auto Group has been a family owned North County business for over 30 years. We never charge any hidden documentation or processing fees. We will make sure you are given the best price and service around. Give us a call at 866-629-8014.
Ford Explorer Sport for Sale
2014 ford explorer sport(US $47,403.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $37,665.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $31,549.00)
2014 ford explorer limited(US $38,944.00)
2011 ford explorer xlt(US $25,944.00)
2013 ford explorer xlt(US $32,944.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Total Tinting & Total Customs ★★★★★
The Auto Body Shop Inc. ★★★★★
Tanners Paint And Body ★★★★★
Tac Transmissions & Custom Exhaust ★★★★★
Square Deal Transmission ★★★★★
Sports Car Centre Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
This Or That: Fiat 500 Abarth vs. Ford Fiesta ST [w/poll]
Thu, 21 Aug 2014
They're pretty darn similar. And yet our views are oh so different.
If you guys could read the transcripts of our editors' chat room, you'd know that we're a pretty argumentative bunch. It's always good-spirited stuff (well, usually), but when we're not obsessively covering this or that, we're usually fighting about one car being better than another. We're all enthusiasts here, and our automotive tastes run the gamut from the weird and unusual to the decidedly mainstream - we all feel strongly about specific cars in a given segment. While it usually makes for good conversation, if we're passionate enough, it can turn into a tomato-throwing showdown.
Court puts kibosh on apartheid lawsuit against Ford, Daimler
Thu, 22 Aug 2013Ford and Daimler have scored a major victory in a long-running lawsuit filed in US federal court by unnamed South African nationals. The suit alleges that both manufacturers and their subsidiaries sold their vehicles to the South African military, despite knowing that they'd be involved in violently putting down anti-apartheid protesters.
According to Reuters, South African plaintiffs filed the case under the 223-year-old Alien Torts Statute, a law which allows foreign nationals to file charges in US courts for perceived breaches of what was originally international law, but now more closely relates to violations of human rights.
And while the case - which also involves computer manufacturer IBM - has been tied up in federal courts for years, a recent case from the Supreme Court struck down a similar suit against Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell), arguing that the ATS doesn't apply to corporations or to conduct if it occurred outside the US. In short, the law applies to individuals, but not corporations like Ford or Daimler. A US appeals court ruled that the conditions apply in this case, potentially drawing this long-running saga to a close, as the defendants will now be allowed to request that the case be dismissed in district court.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.