Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2001 Ford Explorer Sport 2 Door 4x4 Automatic 83000 Miles on 2040-cars

US $3,250.00
Year:2001 Mileage:83000
Location:

Gresham, Oregon, United States

Gresham, Oregon, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:v6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1fmyu70e41ub87535 Year: 2001
Make: Ford
Options: Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Model: Explorer Sport
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Drive Type: automatic
Mileage: 83,000
Number of Cylinders: 6
Disability Equipped: No
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: xlt
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"a great and reliable SUV 4.0 6-cyl automatic has all power options! clean inside and out great condition runs great never had a problem with it.taken vary good care of."

a great and reliable SUV 4.0 6-cyl automatic has all power options! clean inside and out  great condition runs great never had a problem with it.taken vary good care of. asking 3250 O.B.O within a reasonable offer 503-901-6838

Auto Services in Oregon

Vista Body Shop Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 3365 Triangle Dr SE, Scio
Phone: (877) 795-1332

Tualatin Auto Body & So - Cal Northwest ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 19705 SW Teton Ave, King-City
Phone: (503) 692-1579

Truck Designs Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 33804 SE Kelso Rd, Boring
Phone: (503) 668-7942

Transmission Unlimited ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 21550 NW Nicholas Ct # D, Hillsboro
Phone: (503) 941-5017

Tom Denchel`s Country ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1204 SW Dorion, Helix
Phone: (541) 278-9677

The Ugly Chip ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair
Address: Brothers
Phone: (541) 977-0459

Auto blog

Ford calling in 28k Edge crossovers over fuel line leak

Thu, 16 Jan 2014

A problem with the fuel line on certain examples of the Ford Edge has prompted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to issue a recall. The issue revolves around the metal housing on the fuel line pulse damper, which was apparently improperly manufactured in the first place and is prone to crack in certain circumstances, leading to a fuel leak. And as we all know, a fuel leak is not a good thing.
The problem affects model year 2012 and 2013 Edge crossovers equipped with the 2.0-liter engine and manufactured between September 2, 2010 and April 25, 2013 - a total of 27,933 units. Although the Lincoln MKX is closely related to the Edge, since it isn't offered with the same engine (to which the problem is related), the recall does not include the premium-badged version. See the recall notice below for further details.

Ford UK exec says EVs are a good way to lose a fortune

Wed, Mar 19 2014

Stateside, Ford execs are quick to point out the automaker's expansion in the plug-in sector. And despite a minimal presence in the pure EV space, the Blue Oval has been promoting its plug-in vehicles as part of an overall effort to boost fleetwide fuel economy. Too bad the company's UK chief didn't get the memo. There's "no point in us getting behind [EVs] and losing a fortune" - Ford's Mark Ovenden Mark Ovenden, speaking rather frankly at the Geneva Motor Show recently, said he didn't have real high hopes for substantial electric-vehicle adoption and said the company's money was better spent on smaller gas- and diesel-powered engines, the UK's Daily Mail says. Ovenden said of EV development that there was "no point in us getting behind it and losing a fortune," adding that his goal was to have variants of Ford's EcoBoost engine in 40 percent of the company's vehicles. Ford has about a 15-percent market share in the UK. The UK doesn't appear to be as kind to the EV as the US. Nissan last year cut the price of its all-electric Leaf there last year by about $4,000, while the company rolled out a promotion for the Leaf late last year, including allowing Leaf drivers to borrow a gas- or diesel-powered Nissan for free for as long as two weeks a year during the first three years of Leaf ownership. In the US, Ford sold just 229 Ford Focus Electrics during the first two months of the year after moving 1,738 units in 2013.

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.