2009 Xlt Roof Rack Running Boards Cruise Media Ford Explorer Sport Trac 36k on 2040-cars
Alvin, Texas, United States
Engine:4.0L 245Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:GAS
Warranty: YES
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer Sport Trac
Options: LOADED
Trim: XLT Crew Cab Pickup 4-Door
Safety Features: SEAT BELTS HEADLIGHTS BRAKES LIGHTS TURN SIGNALS
Power Options: WINDOWS, LOCKS AND CRUISE CONTROL
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 36100
Disability Equipped: No
Sub Model: WE FINANCE MOTOR TRENDS
NUMBER OF DOORS: 4
Exterior Color: Sangria Red Metallic - (Red)
Interior Color: Dark charcoal Cloth
Number of Cylinders: 6
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): CREWCAB
Ford Explorer Sport Trac for Sale
- 2001 ford explorer sport trac base sport utility 4-door 4.0l
- Limited leather running boards roof rack power seats bed liner tow hitch
- 2003 ford explorer sport trac 4wd 4x4 very clean(US $5,300.00)
- 2008 ford explorer sport trac xlt rwd automatic keyless 1 owner kchydodge(US $11,285.00)
- Xlt 4.0l cd premium sound system bluetooth system auto headlamp on/off-delay
- 2007 limited 1 owner 4.6 v8 mp3/cd auto bed rail red tan leather we finance
Auto Services in Texas
Yang`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wilson Mobile Mechanic Service ★★★★★
Wichita Falls Ford ★★★★★
WHO BUYS JUNK CARS IN TEXOMALAND ★★★★★
Wash Me Down Mobile Detailing ★★★★★
Vara Chevrolet ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit 3 to implement delayed unified towing standards for 2015
Mon, 10 Feb 2014Car buyers have a responsibility to be well-informed consumers. That's not always a very simple task, but some guidelines are self-evident. If you live in a very snowy climate, you generally know a Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro might not be as viable a vehicle choice as an all-wheel drive Explorer or Traverse, for example. If you want a fuel-efficient car, it's generally a good idea to know the difference between a diesel and a hybrid. But what if it's kind of tough to be an informed consumer? What if the information you need is more difficult to come by, or worse, based on different standards for each vehicle? Well, in that case, you might be a truck shopper.
For years, customers of light-duty pickups have had to suffer through different ratings of towing capacities for each brand. For 2015 model year trucks, though, that will no longer be a problem. According to Automotive News, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler Group have announced that starting with next year's models, a common standard will be used to measure towing capacity. The Detroit Three will join Toyota, which adopted the Society of Automotive Engineers' so-called SAE J2807 standards way back in 2011.
The standard was originally supposed to be in place for MY2013, but concerns that it would lower the overall stated capacity for trucks led Detroit automakers to pass. Ford originally passed, claiming it'd wait until its new F-150 was launched to adopt the new standards, leading GM and Ram to follow suit. Nissan, meanwhile, has said it will adopt the new standards as its vehicles are updated, meaning the company's next-generation Titan should adhere to the same tow ratings as its competitors.
More 2015 Ford Mustang pricing information leaks [UPDATE]
Tue, 20 May 2014The big news this morning was that the 2015 Ford Mustang would start at $24,425, including its destination pricing. The big news this afternoon is, well, bigger.
Mustang6G.com has come up with what it claims is pricing info for the entire Mustang line, rather than just the V6. That means we know all about the EcoBoost and GT prices now, which, when combined with the dealer order sheets we reported on last week, gives us our clearest look yet at how the Mustang can be outfitted (we're still a bit short on pricing info for some standalone options, like paint premiums and such).
The base EcoBoost starts at $25,995, while the GT rings up at $32,925.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.