2003 Ford Excusion Eddie Bauer Four Wheel Drive on 2040-cars
Caledonia, New York, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V10
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: Excursion
Trim: eddie bauer
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: four wheel drive
Power Options: heated seats, climate control, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats, heated mirrors
Mileage: 58,875
Exterior Color: Black with gold trim
Interior Color: Tan leather
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 10
This is a one owner vehicle that runs and drives great . The interior is super clean the exterior has a few minor blems with no major damage . Ther are not many of these left this clean and with this low of milage . This vehicle is for sale locally so I reserve to end the auction early. Free delivery to any U.S. address within 200 miles of Caledonia N.Y. 14423
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2000 ford excursion warranty(US $4,999.00)
- 2005 ford excursion eddie bauer edition 6.0l turbo diesel 4wd leather interior(US $22,500.00)
- 2002 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 7.3l(US $15,495.00)
- 2004 ford excursion limited one owner no accidents from n. carolina its perfect(US $10,999.00)
- 2005 ford excursion eddie bauer 4x4 diesel leather heated seats dvd wood alloys(US $13,480.00)
- Suv 4x4 xlt v10 excursion 3rd row custom lift wheels tires new dvd player
Auto Services in New York
Witchcraft Body & Paint ★★★★★
Will`s Wheels ★★★★★
West Herr Chevrolet Of Williamsville ★★★★★
Wayne`s Radiator ★★★★★
Valley Cadillac Corp ★★★★★
Tydings Automotive Svc Station ★★★★★
Auto blog
Motor Trend pits Subaru WRX vs. Ford Focus ST
Thu, 23 Jan 2014The Ford Focus ST has enjoyed a relatively calm, if brief, reign in the world of hot hatches. With nothing else in the class (in the States, at least) but the aging Mazdaspeed3 and Subaru Impreza WRX and the slow-selling Volkswagen Golf R, the Blue Oval's 252-horsepower five door has been the go-to vehicle for those that don't need the high-octane lunacy (and expense) of the rally bred Subaru Impreza WRX STI and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X.
Now, though, as the new Subaru WRX (it's not an Impreza anymore, though, neither is it a hatchback...) starts to arrive at dealers, the Focus ST appears to be under threat for the first time. Naturally, Motor Trend is here to figure out which one is the best, with another one of its Head 2 Head videos. Host Jonny Lieberman puts both cars through their paces, going above and beyond, quite literally, at the very end of the video.
Have a look below and let us know what you think of MT's verdict in Comments.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move
Tue, Dec 6 2016With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.