2002 Ford Excursion Limited Sport Utility 4-door 6.8l on 2040-cars
Frederick, Maryland, United States
2002 Ford Excursion Limited 4X4, Towing, 3rd Row, Entertainment, Triton 6.8L V10 and 4WD. All the right ingredients! Come to the experts! Imagine yourself behind the wheel of this outstanding 2002 Ford Excursion. It's the combination of advanced design and precision engineering that makes the Triton 6.8L V10 engine such an impressive powerplant. J.D. Power and Associates gave the 2002 Excursion 4 out of 5 Power Circles for Overall Initial Quality Design.
|
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2001 ford excursion 4x4 7.3l powerstroke turbo diesel *****super clean*****
- 04 excursion eddie bauer 4x4 diesel tv dvd heated seats we finance texas(US $16,995.00)
- 2000 ford excursion limited 7.3 diesel 4x4 nice suv, 89k no reserve
- 05 excursion (limited) power-stroke (diesel) 4x4 3rd & heated seats carfax tx !!(US $15,995.00)
- No reserve clean carfax eddie bauer trim leather new tires runs great 3rd row
- 2004 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 6.0l
Auto Services in Maryland
Vinny`s Towing & Recovery ★★★★★
Super Sport Auto ★★★★★
Stop N Go Auto & Fleet Services ★★★★★
Premier Collision Center ★★★★★
Monro Muffler Brake & Service ★★★★★
Mint Auto Detailing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Does the new 2015 Ford Mustang have a burnout control system?
Tue, 10 Dec 2013Whether it's lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring or automatic emergency braking, most of the electronic systems we see emerging on new vehicles focus on safety. But there are some there just for enthusiasts. We're talking about systems like automatic throttle blipping for perfect downshifts, or launch control to get that textbook acceleration from a standstill. But the latest system could prove just the opposite of the latter.
Although it has given us most of the details, Ford is still keeping certain elements of its new Mustang secret. But emerging reports may have the skinny on one system which Ford is trying is darnedest to keep under its hat for the time being. That, according to unnamed sources cited by Motor Authority, is burnout control.
The system is reportedly designed to help novices execute the perfect smokey burnout - sort of like launch control, but specifically the opposite. The system could, according to elaborative speculation, lock the front brakes while spooling up the engine to optimal revolutions before dumping (or indicating the driver to do dump) the clutch. A cloud of tire smoke and a long pair of skid marks would then ensue.
Question of the Day: Most degraded car name?
Fri, May 27 2016When Ford came up with a not-so-sporty version of the Pinto and slapped Mustang badges on it in 1974, that was a low point for the Mustang name. When Chrysler applied the venerable Town & Country name on perfectly functional but unglamorous minivans, it saddened many of us. But perhaps the biggest demotion for a once-proud model came when, in 1988, General Motors imported a misery-enhancing Daewoo from Korea and called it the Pontiac LeMans. The original Pontiac LeMans was a great-looking midsize car with fairly advanced (for the time) suspension design and engine options including potent V8s and a screaming overhead-cam straight-six. The Daewoo-based Pontiac LeMans was a cramped, shoddy hooptie that served only to ruin the LeMans name forever, while stealing sales from the Suzuki-based Chevrolet Sprint. Sure, using the once-respected Monterey name on the Mercurized Ford Freestar was bad, but Mercury didn't have long to live at that point. I say the downward spiral of the LeMans name was the most agonizing in automotive history. What do you think? Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Auto News Ford Mercury Pontiac Automotive History Classics questions ford pinto names
Jaguar design boss admits X-Type was a mistake
Thu, 19 Sep 2013History has a way of repeating itself, especially in the auto industry. When Jaguar was owned by Ford, the British brand attempted to field a competitor for the BMW 3 Series, called the X-Type. Based on the bones of a Ford Mondeo, it aped the styling of Jaguar's flagship model, the XJ, while borrowing liberally from the Ford parts bin. That was 2001.
Now, in 2013, Jaguar is planning a new 3 Series challenger based on the platform previewed by the C-X17 Concept, while Ford is attempting to take the latest Mondeo upmarket. The moves have both brands recognizing where, why, and how the X-Type failed. "It didn't look mature or powerful or anything. It was just a car," Jaguar's current head of advanced design, Julian Thomson, told PistonHeads. Basing the X-Type on a front-drive car while giving it styling that was meant for a rear-driver lead to proportions that "were plainly wrong," Thomson told PH. Ford's European head of quality, Gunnar Herrmann, added that the X-Type was "a fake Jaguar, because every piece I touch is Ford."
For what it's worth, the X-Type's successor in the segment will sport rear-drive, with plenty of input from Ian Callum. Thomson described the new model, which would challenge the 3 Series as having, "Big wheels right to the ends of the car, low bonnet, short overhangs, very low cabins." Sounds good to us.