2001 Ford Excursion Limited 7.3l Powerstroke Diesel, 4x4, Low Miles, No Rust!! on 2040-cars
Benzonia, Michigan, United States
Hello, You are bidding on a 2001 Ford Excursion Limited 4x4 with the bulletproof 7.3 powerstroke turbo diesel. Low miles and no rust! The door bottoms and sills are all in great shape. The truck originally was from out west. I bought it from the third owner in Ohio and have only driven it two occasions in Michigan winters. It has been stored in my pole barn during the nasty weather rmonths. I would not hesitate to hop in and drive this truck anywhere in the country. This trucks interior and exterior are in great shape! The gentleman I purchased the truck from in Ohio purchased the truck after it had been in a minor crash. He had the truck repaired and drove it for a while before selling to me. Only defects are the drivers seat armrest is cracking, a small rust scratch on the front bumper, a scrape on the front bumper air dam and some small hail spots on the roof. This truck starts right up, does not smoke, leak or burn any fluids. Transmission and 4x4 work great. Tons of power. Has an aftermarket exhaust, K&N Air cleaner upgrade, Mag Hytec trans pan and an Edge power programmer. I just put brand new 285/75/16 tires on the aftermarket mag wheels, truck has a 4" lift and will clear 35's if you wished. This Excursion runs and drives down the road very nice, smooth and without wander or drift. I have also added a Pioneer AVH-P3300BT stereo to replace the factory ford CD player. The interior and carpet are in very nice shape. I am a non smoker and the vehicle does not have any strange smells or odors of any kind. I have added a set of 2008+ Ford factory Super Duty towing mirrors and have integrated the turn signals, power adjustment and heated glass into the factory controls to improve visability and give a more modern look to the truck. I have more pictures that I plan on making available on a photo hosting site for your review. Ebay seems to only allow 24 pictures. If you have any questions I can be reached here or I can provide my phone number if interested in chatting more about the truck. Also if you are close to me I welcome anybody to make arrangements to come take a test drive. You will not be disappointed with this truck! Thanks for looking and good luck!! On Mar-30-14 at 18:25:00 PDT, seller added the following information: I also have the third row seat and it is in excellent condition. Looks like it has been hardly sat in at all. I can provide a pic if needed. Thanks! |
Ford Excursion for Sale
2004 05 03 02 01 00 ford excursion limited 4x4 powerstroke turbo diesel(US $16,900.00)
2004 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 5.4l(US $7,000.00)
2003 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 6.0l
2002 ford excursion limited 4wd 7.3 turbo diesel immaculate super clean(US $23,500.00)
2004 ford excursion(US $17,900.00)
2005 ford excursion xlt 4x4 diesel bulletproof
Auto Services in Michigan
Xtreme Sound & Performance ★★★★★
Westborn Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Welt Auto Parts & Service Co ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Trojan Auto Connection ★★★★★
Todd`s Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ward's announces 10 Best Engines 2015
Wed, Dec 10 2014Ward's Auto has named its 10 Best Engines for 2015, covering a range of powerplants from fuel-sippers to fire-breathers. As with past years, forced-induction reigns supreme, with seven of the ten engines featuring a turbo or supercharger. This year is slightly different, though, as two of the seven blown engines are turbocharged three-cylinder mills, from the Ford Fiesta and Mini Cooper. They're joined by the 2.0-liter turbo four from the Volvo S60, the 1.8-liter turbo four from the Volkswagen Jetta and the 2.0-liter boxer from the Subaru WRX. BMW and Chrysler were the only marques to be named to this year's list twice, with the electric motor from the i3 joining the Mini's three-pot, and the 3.0-liter turbodiesel V6 in the Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee repping the diesel crowd, alongside a certain supercharged monster. Hyundai also took a prize with a zero-emissions powertrain, with the Tucson FCV's 100-kilowatt fuel cell making the list (apparently Ward's is quite generous with what it deems an "engine"). Rounding out the list are two Autoblog favorites, each displacing 6.2 liters, but producing their power very differently. On the one hand, Chevrolet's overhead-valve, 455-horsepower V8, found in the Corvette, makes its power the old fashioned way. And in the other corner, we have one of the most exciting engines of the year – the 707-hp, 6.2-liter, supercharged Hellcat V8, featured so prominently in the Dodge Challenger and Charger SRT Hellcat. "We spend a lot of time reading the powertrain tea leaves throughout the auto industry, and we're proud that this year's list is a microcosm of all the latest innovation coming from automakers," said Ward's Editor-in-Chief Drew Winter in a statement. "It's not just a list for enthusiasts or for environmentalists," he says. "There's something for every vehicle shopper and every budget. All the powertrains on this list deliver a first-rate driving experience," Winter added. Scroll down for the full list from Ward's, and let us know which engines you think belong and which should have been included in this year's rankings. Ward's 10 Best Engines of 2015 Announced by Penton's WardsAuto Honorees span most diverse and technically advanced engines in 21 years of recognized powertrain excellence SOUTHFIELD, Mich., Dec. 10, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Penton's Wards 10 Best Engines of 2015 have been announced.
Driving the 2021 Chevy Tahoe and big news from Hyundai | Autoblog Podcast #640
Fri, Aug 14 2020In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by News Editor Joel Stocksdale. They discuss some of the big trucks Joel drove: the 2021 Chevy Tahoe and a Mil-Spec-modified Ford F-150. After that is a look at the latest car news including Trofeo versions of Maserati's sedans, Hyundai's new electric brand called Ioniq, and the BMW M3 Touring station wagon and Hyundai Elantra N-Line. They wrap things up with some musings on anniversary of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution and how cars played a role in it. Autoblog Podcast #640 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Reviews2021 Chevy Tahoe Mil-Spec Ford F-150 Maserati Ghibli and Quattroporte Trofeo models revealed Ioniq becomes EV brand for Hyundai 2021 Hyundai Elantra N Line revealed BMW finally announces an M3 station wagon The 19th Amendment and how cars fit in Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Government/Legal Green Podcasts BMW Chevrolet Ford Hyundai Maserati
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.