2000 Ford Excursion Limited 7.3l Powerstroke Turbo Diesel 4x4 on 2040-cars
Evansville, Wyoming, United States
For sale is a 2000 Ford Excursion with the 7.3l Powerstroke Turbo Diesel. I purchased it from my mother and father in 2011, so I have been around this vehicle from the night it came home from Vista Ford of Oxnard CA. Previous to 2011 it has lived its entire life in Southern California.
The inside of the Excursion has never seen any small children nor has a Cigarette ever been smoked in it. The 3rd row seat has a small area of discoloration. The drivers seat has 2 small tears in it. The steering wheel has the usual worn tan leather, and that is why there is a cover on it. Both the front seats are heated but the drivers side does not get very warm at all. It was equipped with factory 6 disc CD changer as well as keyless entry, and yes I have both the keys. It also has the rear parking aid.It also has heated power mirrors. Oil has always been changed every 3000-5000 mi (Depending on use) and the fuel filter has always been changed every second oil change (Only Motorcraft filters). The automatic 4X4 locking hubs work without issue. The Following are recently replaced items:
|
Ford Excursion for Sale
- 2004 ford excursion xlt sport utility 4-door 6.0l
- 2000 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 6.8l
- 2004 xlt 4x4 gray cloth used preowned trailer hitch grill guard 153k miles
- 2000 ford excursion limited 4x4 7.3l powerstroke diesel only 46k original miles
- 2000 ford excursion xlt 3rd row 8 passenger loaded clean no reserve
- 00 excursion 4x4 7.3 diesel big lift 38's on 20's big power leather carfax cert
Auto Services in Wyoming
Windshield Repair of Jackson Hole, the Windshield Doctor ★★★★★
Doyle Johnson`s Auto Repair Inc ★★★★★
DENT TECH ★★★★★
Arts Truck Repair ★★★★★
Advanced Transmissions ★★★★★
Wyoming Lube Express ★★★★
Auto blog
Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k
Tue, 07 Oct 2014Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.
Ford blamed in drug mule lawsuit
Tue, 30 Jul 2013If a college student is caught smuggling drugs across the border, one might think the kid got what was coming to him. But when a Mexican student at the University of Texas in El Paso was caught by Border Patrol agents with duffel bags filled with marijuana in his trunk, the man used a classic excuse: He claimed they weren't his.
While a claim like that is almost unbelievable, Ricardo Magallanes, the student, is now suing Ford for handling its vehicles' key codes negligently enough to allow drug smugglers to break into his Ford Focus and stash the drugs, The Daily Caller reports. The twist here is that four other people who lived in Juarez and worked in El Paso were involved in the same type of scheme - allegedly unwittingly, just like Magallanes - and all the cars were Fords except one model from General Motors. FBI agents also found an employee at a Dallas Ford dealership that had accessed the key codes to all four of the cannabis-stuffed Fords.
While we all may not own Fords, the case still causes us slight paranoia. We'll definitely be checking our trunks before we cross any more international borders.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.