2006 Ford E150 Cargo Van One Owner No Reserve Well Maintained Work Truck Ready on 2040-cars
Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.6 LITRE 8 CYLINDER
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Model: E-Series Van
Trim: CARGO VAN
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Drive Type: REAR
Mileage: 215,063
Exterior Color: White
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
2006 FORD E150 CARGO VAN NO RESERVE
ONE OWNER WELL MAINTAINED. DRIVE THIS VAN ANYWHERE YOU WANT TO GO.
BRAKES, TIRES AND EXHAUST ARE ALL IN GOOD SHAPE. AIR AND CRUISE WORK. COSMETIC CONDITION IS GOOD WITH SOME MINOR TEARS, NICKS AND SCRAPES.
WE ARE LOCATED IN KENOSHA WISCONSIN BETWEEN CHICAGO AND MILWAUKEE AT 4121-7TH. AVE. 53140 RUSS 262-237-1343
THIS IS A SOLID VAN THAT WILL SELL AT A FRACTION OF THE COST OF NEW. REMEMBER THIS VAN IS NOT NEW BUT IT IS IN GOOD CONDITION AND WILL SELL AT NO RESERVE.
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 2009 ford e250 tuscany high top 10 passenger shuttle van in va.(US $15,900.00)
- 2005 ford e250 passenger shuttle van
- 2006 ford e350 ext diesel cargo van in virginia(US $11,900.00)
- 09 ford e-250 cargo van - power equipped - clean - runs 100% - original paint(US $9,500.00)
- 2008 ford e-350 ext 5-passenger van wheelchair lift 62k texas direct auto(US $17,980.00)
- 2006 ford e-350 xl 5.4l v8 15 passanger cd audio 41k mi texas direct auto(US $15,780.00)
Auto Services in Wisconsin
Van`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★
Trans-X-Press Transmissions ★★★★★
Sullivans Two Unlimited ★★★★★
Steve`s Service ★★★★★
South Milwaukee Automotive Service ★★★★★
Schmit Bros Chrysler Dodge Jeep RAM ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Fiesta ST in startling track battle against Toyota GT86
Wed, 26 Jun 2013On the surface, there's very little that the Ford Fiesta ST and Toyota GT86 (or the Scion FR-S that is sold in the US, or the largely similar Subaru BRZ) share in common. One is a hatchback with power coming from a turbocharged engine routed to the front wheels. The other is a coupe with power coming from a naturally aspirated four-cylinder boxer engine routed to the rear wheels.
Thing is, both of them are reasonably priced performance cars aimed at a similar segment of the automotive marketplace, so a comparison isn't out of the question. It is with all of this in mind that we direct you to the video below, in which the blokes from Evo pit the two manic little machines against one another on a race track. The result? Well, it can be summed up this way: Fast versus fun.
See how the track battle goes down in the video below.
Chevy Camaro is a good sport, wishes Ford Mustang Happy 50th
Tue, 15 Apr 2014It was 1966 when Chevrolet launched its challenger to the wildly successful Ford Mustang, the Camaro. While the competition between the two brands was already healthy, the arrival of the Camaro set off one of the most intense, model-to-model rivalries in the industry.
That competitive spirit hasn't stopped Chevy and the Camaro from wishing Ford's iconic muscle car a Happy 50th Birthday as the Ford's April 17 anniversary rolls around. These two cars have been linked over the years, and while the rivalry took a break for a few years in the 2000s, today's competition between the Camaro and Mustang is as fierce as it's ever been.
You might recall that this friendliness when it comes to major milestones isn't too rare. Ford put on quite a display for General Motors' hundredth anniversary back in 2008. As the Camaro's fiftieth birthday approaches in 2016, we wouldn't be surprised to see the Mustang sending its best wishes to its Bowtie rival.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.