2000 Ford Handicap Lowered Floor Only 51k Miles With Independence Package on 2040-cars
Massapequa, New York, United States
PLEASE READ ALL 2000 FORD E-250 CONVERSION INDEPENDENT WHEELCHAIR HANDICAP VAN, IN EXCELLENT CONDITION, RUNNING PERFECT WELL TAKEN CARE OF, VERY CLEAN, IN SHOWROOM CONDITION. LOOKS, DRIVES, SMELLS NEW VERY LOW MILES, ONLY 51,300 MILES. I'M STILL DRIVING. THIS IS NOT AN ORDINARY HANDICAP VAN ULTIMATE INDEPENDENCE PACKAGE, IT HAS EVERY POSSIBLE OPTION EVERYTHING WAS THOUGHT OF WHEN BUILT THIS BEAUTIFUL VAN WAS BUILT FOR INDEPENDENT DISABLED PERSON'S WHO WANTS TO DRIVE HIS/HER OWN. ( ANYBODY CAN DRIVE ) FEW OPTIONS TO MENTION; * REMOTE CONTROLLED POWER SIDE DOORS * REMOTE CONTROLLED HEAVY DUTY WHEELCHAIR LIFT * HAS A SECOND RADIATOR FOR VERY HOT WEATHERS (YOU CAN'T FIND THIS IN ANY OTHER VEHICLE ) * HAS EZ-LOCK SYSTEM FOR OWNER TO DRIVE COMFORTABLY IN HIS/HER WHEELCHAIR * REMOVABLE DRIVER SEAT * HAND CONTROLLED GAS/BRAKE * DROPPED FLOOR * UNDER GAS TANK STEEL PROTECTION * REAR AC ICE COLD * FRONT AC ICE COLD * POWER WINDOWS, LOCKS, ETC... * CRUISE CONTROL * LIFTED 4 INCHES * NEW GOODYEAR WRANGLER HT LT245/75R16 TIRES (BEST TIRES FOR THIS VAN) * NEW MOTORCRAFT FRONT SHOCKS * NEW MOTORCRAFT REAR SHOCKS * NEW MOTORCRAFT FRONT CALIPERS * NEW FRONT BRAKE PADS * NEW FRONT ROTORS * NEW REAR BRAKE PADS * NEW REAR ROTORS * NEW MOTORCRAFT FUEL FILTER * NEW MOTORCRAFT UPPER & LOWER BALL JOINTS * NEW UNDERCARRIAGE PROTECTION ($1,200) * NEW REAR VIEW BACK UP SYSTEM (BESTBUY GEEK-SQUAD INSTALLED) * NEW VIPER REMOTE START (BESTBUY GEEK-SQUAD INSTALLED) (YOU CAN START THE VAN FROM HOME AND WARM UP DURING WINTER OR COOL IT DURING SUMMER) * NEW OIL CHANGE (MOBILE 5000) * NEW AIR FILTER * MANY MORE THINGS..... ENGINE, TRANSMISSION, ELECTRICAL, ETC.. ARE PERFECT. EVERYTHING WORKS AS NEW. ORIGINALLY COSTS OVER $80K CAN BE SEEN ANYTIME MAKE A REASONABLE OFFER BUT DON'T INSULT, IF YOU'RE DISABLED WE WORK SOMETHING OUT, $$$ IS NOT EVERYTHING. DELIVERY AVAILABLE FOR AN ADDITIONAL FEE. |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 2005 ford e250 cargo van -- miles right -- ladder racks, work bins and shelves
- E-350 - long wheel base - powerstroke turbo diesel - no reserve
- 2013 ford e-350 super duty xl standard passenger van 3-door 5.4l(US $26,500.00)
- Ford handicapped van
- E-350 12 passenger van xlt pkg rear a/c & heat power equipment(US $16,950.00)
- 2003 ford e-350 extended high top van, handicap wheelchair lift bus 12 passenger
Auto Services in New York
Tones Tunes ★★★★★
Tmf Transmissions ★★★★★
Sun Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★
Steinway Auto Repairs Inc ★★★★★
Southern Tier Auto Recycling ★★★★★
Solano Mobility ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford exec downplays idea of aluminum-intensive cars
Thu, Jan 15 2015Ford certainly made waves when it rolled out the all-new 2015 F-150 made primarily out of aluminum. But while trimming weight off its vehicles is a top priority for the Detroit automaker, we shouldn't expect the lightweight metal to be used as widely on passenger cars as it has been on its new pickup. Speaking at the Automotive News World Congress on Wednesday, top Ford exec Joe Hinrichs said that using aluminum in passenger cars isn't as beneficial as it is in trucks – primarily because the weight savings isn't as dramatic, or as deeply needed. Though improved fuel economy is certainly one advantage of aluminum construction in a truck like the F-150, low prices at the pump have prompted Ford to highlight another advantage, and that's capability: With less weight on its own, a lighter-weight truck can carry and tow more than a heavier one, because it all comes down to combined weight ratings. Ford is expected to make the new F-Series Super Duty largely out of aluminum for the same reasons, and we wouldn't be surprised to see the next Expedition use the material as well. But while certain components in Ford passenger cars will be made of aluminum, we shouldn't expect entire chassis and bodywork assemblies to use the material as extensively as on the F-150, or on more upscale passenger cars from the likes of Audi or Jaguar. Dearborn is, however, investing in other lightweight materials. It has a joint venture with Dow Chemical to put carbon fiber into mass production, much as BMW has with its i3. The Blue Oval will use a combination of carbon and aluminum on its 2017 GT supercar, and it has stripped weight by removing amenities from the 2016 Mustang GT350R, but apparently neither is a method Ford can practically apply to its volume models. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2015 Ford F-150 View 36 Photos News Source: TheDetroitBureau.com, Automotive News - sub. req.Tip: Ford Green Ford aluminum joe hinrichs
2016 Ford Explorer configurator reveals $30,700* base price, Platinum starts at $52,600*
Wed, Nov 26 2014The a la carte menu for the 2016 Ford Explorer is ready for your... umm... exploring. The first page of the refreshed model's configurator reveals the lineup, including the new Platinum trim, and price increases for three of the carryover models. The base Explorer doesn't change by one red cent: it can still be had for $30,700. The XLT needs $33,400 (a $400 price bump), the Limited goes for $41,300 (a not insignificant $2,900 price increase), and the Sport requires $43,300 (a $200 increase). That new Platinum model goes where no Explorer MSRP has gone before, beginning at $52,600 (*all prices are subject to an $895 destination charge). However, since Ford has put almost everything in it, you can't jack the price up too much further unless you lose your mind in the accessories catalog. You can quickly head that way lower down the order, though. The Limited's price jump appears to be due to the voice-activated navigation system, which comes standard; it was formerly part of a $2,600 option package. The Limited goes up by just $995 when specced with the new 2.3-liter EcoBoost, which raises the power over the 2.0-liter EcoBoost it replaces to 270 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque, but doesn't incur any fuel economy penalty. All-wheel drive tacks on another $2,000, safety features like active park assist and lane departure warning come as part of $3,000 Equipment Group A, and you'll still have another three pages of options to get through. On the other hand, if you just want to get your family bundle into an Explorer without spending a bundle, the base model doesn't offer any packages and only has one option over $200. Let the research begin.
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.