00 Ford E-450 16 Foot Box Truck 7.3 Diesel Engine 69000 Miles Runs Perfect on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
2000 FORD E450 7.3 DIESEL ENGINE 16 FOOT BOX TRUCK SCOTT 2152802120 THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME AND LOOKING AT MY 2000 FORD E-450 16 FT BOX TRUCK. THE UNIQUE THING ABOUT THIS TRUCK IT IS A 7.3 DIESEL ENGINE. THE TRUCK ONLY HAS 69000 ORIGINAL MILES ON IT. WERE CAN YOU FIND A 7.3 DIESEL, 16 FT BOX TRUCK. YOU CAN'T BUT I HAVE ONE. THE TRUCK IS BEING CLEAN AS WE SPEAK. THERE ARE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE TRUCK AT ALL. THERE ARE NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR. THERE ARE A FEW SCUFF MARKS ON THE BODY. THERE ARE NO LEAKS ON THE TRUCK AT ALL. THERE WILL BE NEW PICTURES COMING IN THE NEST FEW DAYS. PLEASE CALL SCOTT WITH QUESTIONS. PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT OUR FEEDBACK, WE TRY TO EXPLAIN THE CARS THE BEST WE CAN. SCOTT 215-280-2120 |
Ford E-Series Van for Sale
- 1978 ford e-250 quadravan 4x4, four wheel drive , adventure wagon
- Ford e250 standard cargo van 4.2l 73k miles ladder cutaway van, box van
- 1998 ford e-150 econoline explorer limited se conversion van hi-top
- 2008 ford e 350 xlt diesel cargo van extended length *l@@k*~1 owner~ no reserve
- 2013 ford e-150 cargo van v8 partition pwr group 14k mi texas direct auto(US $19,780.00)
- 2013 ford e-150 cargo van v8 partition pwr group 27k mi texas direct auto(US $18,980.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
World Class Transmission Svc ★★★★★
Wood`s Locksmithing ★★★★★
Trust Auto Sales ★★★★★
Steele`s Truck & Auto Repair ★★★★★
South Hills Lincoln Mercury ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford's J Mays feels vindicated by Fusion reception
Tue, 25 Sep 2012It's hard to think back now, but the same man overseeing the design of the 2013 Ford Fusion also presided over a rather lackluster period in Ford design, highlighted by vehicles like the Five Hundred and Freestyle. With the redesigned Fusion receiving high praise, J Mays tells Automotive News that he feels vindicated from criticisms suggesting he's not a daring enough designer.
When Mays took over as lead of design in 1997, he admits to having quite an ego ("My head would barely fit through the door some days. I've long since gotten over myself") and the workload to match. With the Blue Oval's portfolio full of premium brands like Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo at that point, along with the bread-and-butter Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models, Mays certainly had quite the challenge.
It was in the mid-2000s that Mays took over just the premium brands, and took on the new title of Chief Creative Officer. At the time, Mays endured some criticism for looking backwards to retro styling, rather than setting a new standard for American car design - criticism that Mays says he is free from with the all-new Fusion.
Subprime financing on the rise in new car sales, leasing too
Fri, 07 Dec 2012We all remember the financial crisis that began several years back. At its core was a splurge of subprime lending for housing loans. The housing bubble burst, triggering a collapse of the mortgage-backed securities market. Apparently, those types of loans still exist in the automotive industry, and the market share for these types of "nonprime, subprime, and deep subprime," loans has grown 13.6 percent compared to the third quarter a year ago.
According to an Automotive News report, high-risk lending expanded to 24.8 percent of total loans in Q3, up from 21.9 percent for this time last year. As this level increased, average credit scores of borrowers dropped to 755, down from 763 a year ago. In that time, the average financing amount increased $90 per vehicle, to $25,963.
At 818, Volvo maintains the highest per-owner credit score, while Mitsubishi has the lowest, at 694. The highest rate of borrowers was at Toyota, with 14 percent of the market, followed by Ford with 13.1 percent and Chevrolet at 11.1.
Defying Trump, major automakers finalize California emissions deal
Tue, Aug 18 2020WASHINGTON — The California Air Resources Board (CARB) and major automakers on Monday confirmed they had finalized binding agreements to cut vehicle emissions in the state, defying the Trump administration's push for weaker curbs on tailpipe pollution. The agreements with carmakers Ford Motor Co, Volkswagen AG, Honda Motor Co and BMW AG were first announced in July 2019 as voluntary measures prompting anger from U.S. President Donald Trump. A month later, the Justice Department opened an antitrust probe into the agreements. The government ended the investigation without action. The Trump administration in March finalized a rollback of U.S. vehicle emissions standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026. That is far weaker than the 5% annual increases in the discarded rules adopted under President Barack Obama. The 50-page California agreements, which extend through 2026, are less onerous than the standards finalized by the Obama administration but tougher than the Trump administration standards. The automakers have also agreed to electric vehicle commitments. Volvo Cars, owned by China's Geely Holdings, said in March it planned to join the automakers agreeing to the California requirements. It has also finalized its agreement. The settlement agreements say California and automakers agreed to resolve "potential legal disputes concerning the authority of CARB" and other states that have adopted California's standards. In May, a group of 23 U.S. states led by California and some major cities, challenged the Trump vehicle emissions rule. Other major automakers like General Motors Co, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and Toyota Motor Corp did not join the California agreement. Those companies also sided with the Trump administration in a separate lawsuit over whether the federal government can strip California of the right to set zero emission vehicle requirements. Ford said the "final agreement will reduce emissions in our vehicles at a more stringent rate, support and incentivize the production of electrified products, and create regulatory certainty." BMW said "by setting these long-term, predictable, and achievable standards, we have the regulatory certainty that is necessary for long-term planning that will not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions but ultimately benefit consumers as well."Â