Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2023 Ford Bronco on 2040-cars

US $35,000.00
Year:2023 Mileage:5617 Color: Gray /
 Blue
Location:

Medford, Massachusetts, United States

Medford, Massachusetts, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Utility
Transmission:Automatic
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Vehicle Title:Clean
Year: 2023
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMEE5JR1PLB48857
Mileage: 5617
Model: Bronco
Make: Ford
Engine Size: 3 L
Interior Color: Blue
Previously Registered Overseas: No
Number of Seats: 5
Number of Previous Owners: 1
Number of Cylinders: 6
Drive Type: 4WD
Manufacturer Warranty: 5 Years
Exterior Color: Gray
Car Type: Passenger Vehicles
Number of Doors: 4
Country/Region of Manufacture: United States
Condition: Certified pre-owned: To qualify for certified pre-owned status, vehicles must meet strict age, mileage, and inspection requirements established by their manufacturers. Certified pre-owned cars are often sold with warranty, financing and roadside assistance options similar to their new counterparts. See the seller's listing for full details. See all condition definitions

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Wakefield Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 20 Lincoln St, East-Boston
Phone: (781) 245-5548

Tody`s Services Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Truck Service & Repair
Address: Ashby
Phone: (617) 527-0013

Supreme Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 13 Delnore Pl, South-Weymouth
Phone: (617) 298-2280

Stoneham Ford ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 211 Main St, East-Boston
Phone: (877) 204-2822

South Boston Auto Tech, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6 Devine Way, Hyde-Park
Phone: (617) 269-9850

Revolution Automotive Services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic, Auto Transmission
Address: 445 Walpole Street, South-Waltham
Phone: (774) 849-0729

Auto blog

Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014

Thu, 27 Feb 2014

Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.

Ford cranks up '32 Ford body production

Tue, 14 Jan 2014

If you're going to build your own hot rod, you'll want to start with a '32 Ford 5-Window Coupe. Favored by American servicemen returning from World War II, the '32 Ford remains the very icon of the hot rod to this day. The trouble is there were only so many of them made in the first place, and finding one today can be a challenge. That's where reproduction models come in.
The aftermarket is replete with companies that will sell you a fiberglass body in the form of a '32 Ford coupe, but quality can be hit or miss. So to help meet demand among hot rod builders and enthusiasts, Ford has teamed up with United Pacific Industries to offer officially licensed body shells.
Announced at the SEMA show in November, the '32 Ford 5-Window Coupe body is made from stamped steel according to original specifications from original machinery where possible or reproduced machinery built to the same original specifications where necessary. The bodies are ready to accept vintage powertrains or crate motors from the Ford Racing catalog, and join the 9,000 other parts offered in the Ford Component Sales catalog - including similar reproduction bodies available for the 1965-70 Mustang and 1940 Ford Coupe. From there, the proverbial sky's the limit.

Aluminum lightweighting does, in fact, save fuel

Mon, Apr 14 2014

When the best-selling US truck sheds the equivalent weight of three football fullbacks by shifting to aluminum, folks start paying attention. Oak Ridge National Laboratory took a closer look at whether the reduced fuel consumption from a lighter aluminum body makes up for the fact that producing aluminum is far more energy intensive than steel. And the results of the study are pretty encouraging. In a nutshell, the energy needed to produce a vehicle's raw materials accounts for about 10 percent of a typical vehicle's carbon footprint during its total lifecycle, and that number is up from six percent because of advancements in fuel economy (fuel use is down to about 68 percent of total emissions from about 75 percent). Still, even with that higher material-extraction share, the fuel-efficiency gains from aluminum compared to steel will offset the additional vehicle-extraction energy in just 12,000 miles of driving, according to the study. That means that, from an environmental standpoint, aluminum vehicles are playing with the house's money after just one year on the road. Aluminum-sheet construction got topical real quickly earlier this year when Ford said the 2015 F-150 pickup truck would go to a 93-percent aluminum body construction. In addition to aluminum being less corrosive than steel, that change caused the F-150 to shed 700 pounds from its curb weight. And it looks like the Explorer and Expedition SUVs may go on an aluminum diet next. Take a look at SAE International's synopsis of the Oak Ridge Lab's study below. Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of Aluminum-Intensive Vehicle Design Advanced lightweight materials are increasingly being incorporated into new vehicle designs by automakers to enhance performance and assist in complying with increasing requirements of corporate average fuel economy standards. To assess the primary energy and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) implications of vehicle designs utilizing these materials, this study examines the potential life cycle impacts of two lightweight material alternative vehicle designs, i.e., steel and aluminum of a typical passenger vehicle operated today in North America. LCA for three common alternative lightweight vehicle designs are evaluated: current production ("Baseline"), an advanced high strength steel and aluminum design ("LWSV"), and an aluminum-intensive design (AIV).