The Bronco was owned by ex wife the past few years. She gave it our son for a vehicle. So, I put all new tires on it, had the front brakes replaced, front wheel bearings serviced, trail arm bushing replaced and the left upper and lower ball joints with an alignment. Did some other things to get it good shape for him... Over $1700 invested in the past 2 months...
We have used it a couple of months and loved it! However.. He took it out to our friends farm and slipped the rear end in a hole just deep enough that he could not get it out. After pulling him out, it was noticed that the front of the transmission is leaking pretty good. It still runs fine and drives, but we parked it immediately as not to do any further damage. Best case scenario is you pull the transmission out, replace the front seal and have the transmission and cooler flushed and all is good. Worst case scenario is it will need a different transmission. I really can't say which. So, this would be good if you are able to handle some mechanical work. Otherwise, the AC is cold, it has PW PL PS and an am/fm cd stereo. Worst case scenario it is probably worth the price if you just take the wheels and tires off and salvage the rest! But, I do think it is way too good for that! No warranty- Arrangements for pick-up must be made within 5 days of auction ending. NO SHIPPING available. |
Ford Bronco for Sale
- Monster truck 1986 full size ford bronco 4x4- off road restored not diesel
- 1969 ford bronco w/ extras(US $5,900.00)
- 1984 ford bronco(US $1,500.00)
- 1987 ford bronco(US $1,500.00)
- 1969 ford bronco
- 1973 ford bronco(US $28,000.00)
Auto Services in Kansas
X-Treme Automotive L.L.C. ★★★★★
Wholesale Batteries Inc ★★★★★
Wholesale Batteries Inc ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Service Plus Inc ★★★★★
Trudo`s Automotive ★★★★★
ORR Radiator Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Weekly Recap: Auto execs face life in prison for recall delays under proposed legislation
Sat, 09 Aug 2014
The stiff punishments are part of broader transportation legislation, but clearly McCaskill has automakers in her sights.
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill threw down the gauntlet this week, proposing a bill that could send auto executives to prison for life if they were found to have delayed a recall. She also wants to eliminate the limit for fines for auto safety violations, which are currently capped at $35 million.
2015 Ford Mustang [w/videos]
Thu, 05 Dec 2013
It'd be unwise to bet against the sixth generation of this legendary nameplate.
The 2015 Ford Mustang is assuredly the most anticipated new vehicle of the year. The redesigned Pony Car has been the subject of frantic gossiping and covert spy photos covering everything from the way it looks to the tech it will include, its performance, mechanicals and a bevy of other aspects of Ford's performance icon.
Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid
Tue, Jun 17 2014It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.