Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Ford Bronco on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:169379
Location:

Missoula, Montana, United States

Missoula, Montana, United States
Advertising:

 

I am relisting this Bronco because the winning bidder would not pay.  Please be certain that you intend to pay for it before you bid.


My mother bought this 1968 Bronco in AUG 1968.  It still retains the dealership badge from Academy Ford in Laurel, MD.  She transferred the title to me sometime in 1972, and I have been the only owner and driver ever since.  It has been driven 169,379 original miles.  The title lists a sale of the vehicle in APR 1984, but that is an administrative error that appears on all Montana titles originated prior to 1984.  When the Motor Vehicle Division changed from paper files to microfilm, they entered that change as a “sale.”  I have a letter from the MVD explaining that entry on the title.  The title is clear and the vehicle is currently registered.  Until APR 2013, when I bought a 2001 4Runner, this 1968 Bronco was the only car I had ever owned.

 

This Bronco has a problem that makes it unsuitable now as everyday transportation.  The engine runs, and I can move it around on the street to get it out of the way of the periodic street-cleaning operations, but it runs very roughly.  It hasn’t had a tune-up since NOV 2001.  That was about 7,000 miles ago, but it was also over 12 years ago.  I had the carburetor rebuilt last November, and that made it easier to start and eliminated the stalling problem, but it still runs roughly.

 

The car also has 2 lesser problems that make it inadvisable to drive it in the rain or even park it in the rain.  The first is well known to owners of 1966-1968 Broncos:  There are no more original fuel pumps in existence.  The original fuel pumps had a vacuum booster that enabled the vacuum windshield wipers to exert enough force to wipe snow off the windshield.  Without the booster, the wipers only work with barely enough speed to keep up with a light rain.  You have to be certain that it won’t rain very hard before you can drive it anywhere.  The current after-market fuel pump was installed about 3,000 miles ago, and it pumps fuel just fine, but it gives no help to the wipers.  The windshield washer has nothing to do with the fuel pump, but I’ll mention here that the washer motor doesn’t work.

 

The second of the lesser problems is the deterioration of the window brushes that kept snow and most rain out of the door mechanisms.  I’ve tried to remedy that by applying duct tape to the gaps, but the door locks and latches have to be cleaned and lubed frequently now or they will jam.

 

The other defects are visible in the photos.  The driver’s side floor pan has a 3-inch hole where the heel of my right shoe rested beneath the accelerator pedal.  The rubber-coated dash is heat-cracked, and the driver’s arm rest has completely decomposed.  The left side of the front bumper was bent by a young man who was late for class, trying to squeeze into a parking space in front of me on a snowy day in 2008.

 

Maintenance and repairs have been performed as needed over the years, but the vehicle is by no means restored.  As you can see from the photos, it has the usual Bronco rust, particularly on the pickup bed, where I carried wet materials for many years.  The heater/defroster and electricals all work, except for the windshield washer motor mentioned above. Otherwise, this Bronco is all original, including the paint and uncut rear fenders, except for maintenance parts and the following:

 

1.       The roll bar was installed in 1997.

2.      The bench seat was re-upholstered in 1995.

3.      The passenger’s wing window was smashed during a burglary in 1979 and replaced with a chrome Ford part.

4.      All other windows except the driver’s wing window and the right rear quarter window have been shot out at least once by BB guns and replaced.  The rear lift gate window has a BB impact crater on it from the most recent incident, but the BB did not penetrate or shatter the glass.

5.      The driver’s outside rear view mirror was knocked off by vandals in JAN 2013 and replaced with an after-market duplicate.

6.      The current tires are Cooper radials purchased in 1994.  I believe they have about 24,000 miles on them.  The spare is a Sears bias ply tire purchased in the mid-1980s.

 

Included in the auction are the original jack and lug wrench/jack handle; an additional 4-way lug nut wrench; tire chains and stretchers for all 4 wheels; and some 40 year old jumper cables.

 

The only unusual item on this Bronco is the spare tire fixture on the right rear quarter panel.  It allows the original swing-out spare tire carrier to swing 270 degrees and be fixed to the right side of the car, apparently to get the spare out of the way when the tailgate had to be opened frequently.  I have never used it.  I rarely see that fixture on restored Broncos, so I guess they remove them.

 

The winner of this auction is required to pay a $500 deposit via PayPal within 48 hours of the close of the auction, and then pay the remainder of the sale price in cash or certified check.   I’ll transfer the title to the winning bidder when the check clears my bank.  LOCAL PICK UP ONLY.  You’ll have to pick up the Bronco at my residence in Missoula, MT.  If you have any questions, please contact me by email.

Auto Services in Montana

Warrior Auto Works ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Windshield Repair
Address: 8171 Mullan Rd, Lolo
Phone: (406) 829-3830

University Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 3600 S Reserve St, Lolo
Phone: (406) 721-4900

T & R Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Auto Transmission
Address: 1081 Whitefish Stage, Creston
Phone: (406) 314-2901

McGhee`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 12333 Washington Sq, Yellowtail
Phone: (301) 843-6551

Euro Motor Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 8164 Richmond Hwy, Yellowtail
Phone: (703) 360-1901

Engleside Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 8541 Richmond Hwy, Yellowtail
Phone: (703) 780-3835

Auto blog

1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup

Fri, 18 Jul 2014

Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.

Ford launches pair of recalls affecting fullsize sedans and Transit Connect van

Wed, Jan 28 2015

Ford has announced a pair of pretty significant recalls affecting the 2010-2013 Ford Taurus and Police Interceptor, as well as their platform-mate, the Lincoln MKS. A separate recall covers the 2014 Transit Connect. The fullsize sedans include 205,000 vehicles built at Chicago Assembly over a variety of timeframes, ranging between December 1, 2009 and November 30, 2012. The vehicles, 194,889 of which were sold in the United States, have an issue with the spring controls on the interior door handles that could cause the door to open in a side-impact crash. The Transit Connect recall, meanwhile, includes 16,100 vans built between November 6, 2013 and September 20,2014 at the company's Valencia, Spain factory. In these vehicles, the seatbelt fasteners may not have been tightened properly, which could cause them to loosen over time, a condition that's obviously bad news in the event of a crash. Ford says it is not aware of any accidents, injuries or crashes in either recall. Owners will, of course, be notified and asked to report in for inspections and if necessary, free replacements. Scroll down for the full press release from Ford, which includes the complete breakdown of dates during which the affected sedans were built in Chicago. JAN 28, 2015 | DEARBORN, MICH. FORD ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS Ford is issuing two safety recalls. No accidents or injuries are attributed to either of these conditions. Details are as follows: Ford issues safety recall for certain 2010-2013 Ford Taurus, Lincoln MKS and Ford Police Interceptor sedans for interior door handle issue Ford is issuing a safety recall for approximately 205,000 2010-2013 Ford Taurus, Lincoln MKS and Ford Police Interceptor sedans due to an issue with the spring that controls the interior door handles. If the spring is unseated, the door may become unlatched in a side-impact crash, increasing the risk of injury. Ford is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to this condition. Affected vehicles include certain 2010-2013 Ford Taurus vehicles built Dec. 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010 and Feb. 1, 2011 to Nov. 30, 2012 at Chicago Assembly Plant; certain 2010-2013 Lincoln MKS vehicles built June 2, 2011 to Oct. 31, 2011 at Chicago Assembly Plant; and certain 2010-2013 Ford Police Interceptor sedans built Dec. 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010 and Feb. 1, 2011 to Nov. 30, 2012 at Chicago Assembly Plant.

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid

Thu, 02 May 2013

No Prius Killer
As much as we enthusiasts like to rail on the lowly Toyota Prius as the harbinger of death for all we hold dear, there's no denying the machine's absolute and interminable grip on the hybrid hatchback market in the United States. Toyota has so thoroughly sunk its teeth into the segment that you can clearly hear the automaker's incisors clacking against one another with the conclusion of each financial quarter. And there's little wonder why. Buyers can plop down less than $25,000 and have a runabout that can return up to an estimated 51 miles per gallon in the city, leaving every other entry on the market with precious little gristle to gnaw on.
Enter the 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid. With its claimed 47 mpg combined, the funky little hatch from Europe already falls behind the 48 mpg city offered by the Prius, but that marginal sacrifice in fuel economy could be a small price to pay for buyers who want a credible alternative to the stalwart Toyota. Unfortunately, like the Fusion Hybrid, the C-Max Hybrid had trouble even approaching its Environmental Protection Agency estimates during our time with the car.