1989 Ford Bronco, No Reserve on 2040-cars
Orange, California, United States
Body Type:SUV
Engine:8
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Year: 1989
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco
Trim: 2 DOOR
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: UNKNOWN
Options: CD Player
Mileage: 97,531
Power Options: Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Tan
PLEASE READ AD IN ITS ENTIRETY PRIOR TO BIDDING
ALL NEW EBAY BIDDERS, FIRST TIME BIDDERS TO OUR SITE, OR
BIDDERS WITH "0" FEEDBACK MUST CONTACT OUR OFFICE WITH YOUR NAME
AND PHONE NUMBER BEFORE BIDDING OR YOUR BID WILL BE CANCELED! PLEASE CALL (714)
997-3346. (IF NO ANSWER, EMAIL YOUR
INFORMATION) TODO
POSTOR NUEVO EN EBAY, O PRIMERA VEZ APOSTANDO, O POSTOR CON "0"
INFORMACION, TENDRA QUE COMUNICARSE CON NUESTRA OFICINA Y DAR SU NOMBRE Y
TELEFONO ANTES DE APOSTAR. SINO LA CONCECUENCIA SERA QUE LA APUESTA SERA
CANCELADA! (714) 997-3346.
Up
for auction is a 1989 Ford Bronco that was recently donated to a national
charitable foundation and is being sold with NO RESERVE.
The
vehicle is equipped with a 8cyl engine and automatic transmission. The odometer shows 97,531 miles. It’s fairly well equipped with most of the
options. The seats are tan and appear to
be in decent condition, although a good detail will make a huge
difference. The exterior of the car is
blue and is showing signs of wear and is faded.
It has a few door dings and scratches.
The tires appear to HAVE ROUGHLY 45% road life left. Please refer to the
photos included in this auction for more description details.
This vehicle runs ROUGH but does NOT drive.
The initial indication from our lot personnel is that the fuel pump is
non-functional and needs replacing, however, this is purely speculation.
As is the case with all donated
vehicles we do not perform a detailed mechanical or physical inspection. We simply convey what we are able to observe. There may be other problems with the car that
are not evident. Therefore, please bid
accordingly.
INFORMATION CONCERNING VEHICLE TITLE:
This vehicle comes with a clear California Title and its Registration was valid
through 8/13.
INFORMATION
CONCERNING VEHICLE CONDITION:
We make
every effort to photograph important details of the vehicles body condition,
however small dings, scratches and blemishes in the vehicles paint and body are
often difficult to catch in the camera lens, so if you fail to personally
inspect the car, please know that these imperfections may exist.
Since the
car was donated we do not have any further information on the vehicle other
than what is provided herein. Once again
- As is the case with ALL our donated vehicles we can only provide bidders with
a very limited evaluation of the car's condition. We are not in the body shop or automotive repair business
and cannot guarantee that our observations are 100% accurate. The car has not
been formally inspected and buyers should understand that the opinions provided
herein are purely observational and are not a guarantee of condition.
We
welcome and highly advise personal inspections.
Please contact our office at (714) 997-3346 for setting up an
appointment.
INFORMATION CONCERNING PAYMENT
FOR VEHICLE:
Accepted
form of payment is cash in person, credit card (visa or mc only) AND DEPENDING ON TOTAL PRICE, PAYPAL (100.00 TO 500.00 ONLY).
All taxes, fees, and penalties due to the DMV,
are the responsibility of the buyer.
INFORMATION CONCERNING PICK-UP OF
VEHICLE:
Pickup
must occur within THREE (3) days of the end of the auction, unless other
arrangements are made via phone conversation with Gia. There will be a storage fee of $30.00 per day
for any vehicle left on our premises after this time. VEHICLES WILL NOT BE
RELEASED UNLESS FEES ARE PAID.
The
winning bidder is responsible for picking the vehicle up in Orange, CA (off the
57 Freeway). The Address is 551 N
Batavia St. Orange, Ca 92868.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
“This motor vehicle is being
sold “AS-IS”, with all faults, including but not limited to those described
herein, as well as any other faults or defects, whether or not presently known
or discoverable with or without inspection and operation of the vehicle. Should
the motor vehicle be found defective following its purchase, the buyer is fully
responsible for any and all servicing and repair costs. MRE hereby disclaims
any and all warranties in connection with this sale, expressed or implied.”
·
Please email us if you have any questions prior to
bidding.
**All sales are subject
to a $75/$100
administration/Doc fee California residents pay sales tax and
registration fees. Out-of-State buyers may register and pay applicable taxes in
their home state. **The
buyer is responsible for all shipping costs. |
Ford Bronco II for Sale
1989 ford bronco ii xl sport utility 2-door 2.9l
1969- classic ford bronco -excellent condition(US $35,000.00)
Florida , low miles , 1 owner , carfax certified , 4x4 , all wheel drive , rare
1972 lifted ford bronco, 32000 miles
Restored '73 bronco
1987 ford bronco ii xl sport utility 2-door 2.9l(US $4,200.00)
Auto Services in California
Yoshi Car Specialist Inc ★★★★★
WReX Performance - Subaru Service & Repair ★★★★★
Windshield Pros ★★★★★
Western Collision Works ★★★★★
West Coast Tint and Screens ★★★★★
West Coast Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy
Thu, Jan 8 2015With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.
Ford board pushing Mulally for decision amidst fears story is drowning out other news
Thu, 12 Dec 2013Automakers and their executives rarely like to divulge information regarding future goings on, but the board of directors at Ford sound like they're getting a little antsy about chief executive officer Alan Mulally and his plans for 2014.
According to Reuters, as news of Mulally's possible departure to Microsoft continues to swirl, Ford's board is looking to push the affable executive to make a decision about his future sooner rather than later. Apparently, the board is growing concerned that this will-he/won't-he drama may end up distracting the media from covering Ford's other big news events next year - items like the debut of key all-new products like the Mustang and F-150.
So far, the picture for Mulally's eventual successor remains fuzzy, but it's understood that the leading candidate remains the company's chief operating officer, Mark Fields. Just recently, we heard that Mulally will stay until the end of 2014, but a few months ago, Ford seemed open to the idea of him stepping down earlier than that.
The USPS needs 180,000 new delivery vehicles, automakers gearing up to bid
Wed, Feb 18 2015Winning the New York City Taxi of Tomorrow tender was a huge prize for Nissan, even though the company is still working through the process of claiming its prize. The United States Postal Service has begun the process to take bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace the all-too-familiar Grumman Long Life Vehicle, and that will be a much larger plum for the automaker who wins it, perhaps worth more than six billion dollars. The Grumman LLV is an aluminum body covering a Chevrolet S-10 pickup chassis and General Motors' Iron Duke four-cylinder engine. The USPS bought them from 1987 to 1994, and the 163,000 of them still in service are a monumental drain on postal resources: they get roughly ten miles to the gallon instead of the quoted 16 mpg, drink up more than $530 million in fuel each year, and their constant repair needs like the balky sliding door and leaky windshields have led the service to increase the annual maintenance budget from $100 million to $500 million. A seat belt is about as modern as it gets for safety technology, and the USPS says that assuming things stay the same, it can't afford to run them beyond 2017. Last year it put out two triage requests for proposals seeking 10,000 new chassis and drivetrains for the Grumman and 10,000 new vehicles. The LLV is also too small for the modern mail system in which package delivery is growing and letter delivery is declining. The service says it doesn't have a fixed idea of the ideal "next-generation delivery vehicles," but it listed a number of requirements in its initial request and is open to any proposal. Carriers have some suggestions, though, saying they want better cupholders, sun visors that they can stuff letters behind, a driver's compartment free of slits that can swallow mail, and a backup camera. The request for information sent to automakers pegs the tender at 180,000 vehicles that would cost between $25,000 and $35,000 apiece, and it will hold a conference on February 18 to answer questions about the contract. GM is the only domestic maker to avow an interest, while Ford and Fiat-Chrysler have remained cagey. Yet with a possible $6.3 billion up for grabs and some new vans for sale that would be advertised on every block in the country, we have a feeling everyone will be listening closely come February 18. We also have a feeling the LeMons series is going to be flooded with Grummans come 2017. News Source: Wall Street Journal, Automotive News - sub.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.051 s, 7891 u